Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02983227

A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of GDC-0853 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Enrolled in Study GA29350

A study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of GDC-0853 in participants with moderate to severe active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) who have completed 12 weeks of study treatment in Study GA29350. Eligible participants from Study GA29350 who elect to participate will receive treatment with GDC-0853 twice daily (BID) in an open-label fashion for 52 weeks, followed by a safety follow-up period of 8 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–76 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

APRILLUS, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Completion of treatment as specified in Study GA29350, including completion of the Day 84 study visit assessments
  • Acceptable safety and tolerability during Study GA29350 as determined by the investigator or Medical Monitor
  • Have not received any prohibited medications in Study GA29350
  • While taking methotrexate, must be willing to receive oral folic acid (at least 5 milligrams per week [mg/week])
  • If receiving oral corticosteroids (less than or equal to [</=] 10 milligrams per day [mg/day] prednisone or equivalent) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, doses have remained stable for the duration of Study GA29350

Exclusion criteria

  • Met protocol defined treatment stopping criteria during Study GA29350
  • Treatment with any investigational agent (i.e., other than study drug) or live/attenuated vaccine or any other prohibited medication during Study GA29350 or since the last administration of study drug in Study GA29350
  • In the opinion of the investigator, any new (since initially enrolling in the Phase II Study GA29350), significant, uncontrolled comorbidity that would increase the risk to the participant in Study GA30067
  • Pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study
  • Participants who experienced a de novo or reactivated serious viral infection such as hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during the Phase II Study GA29350
  • Any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with intravenous antibiotics during the Phase II Study GA29350
  • Participants who developed a malignancy during the Phase II Study GA29350
  • 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) on Day 84 in Study GA29350 that demonstrates clinically relevant abnormalities that may affect participant safety or interpretation of study results
  • Current treatment with medications that are well known to prolong the QT interval

Treatment and study plan

GDC-0853

Drug

GDC-0853 was administered orally at a dose of 200mg, as per the dosing schedules described above.

Other names: RO7010939

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Day 1 up until 8 weeks after the last dose of study drug (up to 1 year, 2 months)

    An Adverse Event (AE) was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response up to Week 12

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate]

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].

  4. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

  5. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

  6. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 ESR)

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

  7. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 ESR)

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6.

  8. Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity (LDA) Based on DAS28

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. LDAS is defined as DAS28 ≤ 3.2

  10. Percentage of Participants With ACR/EULAR Remission

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Assessed according to the Boolean based definition (tender joint count =<1, swollen joint count =<1, C-reactive Protein (CRP) =<1, and patient global assessment =<1)

  11. Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PhGA (based on 0-10 cm VAS, where 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity), and CRP. SDAI total score ranges from 0 (no disease activity) to 86 (maximal disease activity), where higher scores represents higher disease activity. The SDAI =< 3.3 indicates disease remission, > 3.4 to 11 indicates low disease activity, > 11 to 26 indicates moderate disease activity, and > 26 indicates high disease activity

  12. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    CDAI was derived as the sum of the following: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), participant global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, and physician assessment of disease activity. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 millimeters (mm) and rounded to the nearest centimeter (cm) on a visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total CDAI score range was 0-76, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. Change from baseline at a particular time point was calculated among patients with data available at both baseline and the time point of interest. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.

  13. Change From Baseline in Tender/Painful Joint Count Based on 68 Joints

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Tender Joint Count: a total of 68 joints will be assessed for tenderness. Each joint is assessed for the presence/absence of tenderness. 68 joints are assessed for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

  14. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count Based on 66 Joints

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Swollen Joint Count: a total of 66 joints will be assessed for swelling. Each joint is assessed for the presence/absence of swelling. 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

  15. Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain, Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain

  16. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Using VAS Score

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Participant-assessed arthritis pain was scored on a 100-mm VAS, where the distance from 0 mm represented the participant's self evaluation of arthritis pain (0 mm=none; 100 mm=very severe). Change from baseline at a particular time point was calculated among patients with data available at both baseline and the time point of interest, where negative change indicated a decrease in participant-assessed arthritis pain.

  17. Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, Using VAS Score

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    Physician's assessment of participant's disease activity was scored on a 100-mm VAS, where the distance from 0 mm represented the physician's assessment of the participant's disease activity (0 mm=very good; 100 mm=very poor). Change from baseline at a particular time point was calculated among patients with data available at both baseline and the time point of interest, where negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in physician-assessed disease activity.

  18. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    C-reactive protein is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in milligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)

  19. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52

    The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index is a patient-reported outcome used to assess difficulty in performing activities of daily living. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities.

    To respond to each question, a four-level response with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring is as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1= with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. The composite HAQ-DI score is the mean of the eight domain scores and the score ranges from 0 (no functional impairment) to 3 (maximum functional impairment). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  20. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2.0 (V2) Scores for Physical and Mental Components

    Time frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52

    The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36v2) is a questionnaire used to assess functional health and well-being and consists of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health.

    The SF-36v2 is summarized into Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. The PCS and MCS scores range from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

  21. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score

    Time frame: Weeks 12, 24 and 52

    The FACIT-Fatigue Scale consists of 13 items designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by the patient in the previous 7 days. For each question, there are five possible responses: 0 (not at all), 1 (a little bit), 2 (somewhat), 3 (quite a bit), 4 (very much).

    A total fatigue score is calculated by summing all items, and possible total scores range from 0 (maximum fatigue) to 52 (no fatigue). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in the patient's fatigue (less fatigue).

  22. Area Under the Concentration Time Curve (AUC) of GDC-0853 at Steady State (AUC,ss)

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) on Weeks 0 (Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52/early termination

    Population PK model estimated AUC of GDC-0853 at steady-state. AUC was measured in Nanograms (ng) per millilitre(mL)*hour (hr).

  23. Minimum Plasma Concentration of GDC-0853 at Steady State (Ctrough,ss)

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) on Weeks 0 (Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52/early termination

    Population PK model estimated minimal plasma concentration (Ctrough) of GDC-0853 at steady-state (ss).

  24. Plasma Decay Half-Life of GDC-0853 at Steady State (t1/2,ss)

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) on Weeks 0 (Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52/early termination

    Population PK model estimated plasma decay half life of GDC-0853 at steady-state.

  25. Apparent Oral Clearance of GDC-0853 at Steady State (CL/F,ss)

    Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) on Weeks 0 (Day 1), 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52/early termination

    Population PK model estimated apparent oral clearance of GDC-0853 at steady-state.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Genentech, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase II Open-Label Extension Study of Patients Previously Enrolled in Study GA29350 to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of GDC-0853 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Dec 6, 2016
Registry last updated
Aug 3, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.