Q/LAIV-BFS (MEDI8662)
BiologicalA single dose of Q/LAIV-BFS delivered using the BFS delivery system (0.2 mL) on Day 0.
NCT Number: NCT00952705
The purpose of this study was to show that quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV-BFS; MEDI8662) was at least as immunogenic as two different forms of the commercial vaccine, FluMist, by comparing the strain-specific antibody levels in the blood.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–49 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Coastal Clinical Research, Inc., Mobile, Alabama, United States
The primary objective of this study was to determine the immunologic noninferiority of MEDI8662, a quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV) (delivered intranasally using the blow-fill-seal [BFS] delivery system) (Q/LAIV-BFS) to two trivalent formulations of licensed FluMist (delivered intranasally using the Becton Dickinson [BD] Accuspray™ device) by comparing the strain-specific geometric mean titers (GMTs) post dosing.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A single dose of Q/LAIV-BFS delivered using the BFS delivery system (0.2 mL) on Day 0.
FluMist/B/Yamagata - 0.2 mL dose at Day 0
FluMist/B/Victoria - 0.2 mL dose at Day 0
Time frame: Day 28 to 35
Noninferior immune response was assessed by evaluating the upper bound of the 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of strain-specific HAI GMTs for the specified comparisons. The GMT ratio = GMT in comparator (All FluMist group) divided by the GMT in the Q/LAIV-BFS arm.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. The comparators for seroresponse to the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains were participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. The comparator for seroresponse to the B/Yamagata strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Yamagata arm.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. The comparator for seroresponse to the B/Victoria strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Victoria arm.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the A/H1N1 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the A/H3N2 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the B/Yamagata strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Yamagata arm.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the B/Victoria strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Victoria arm.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the A/H1N1 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the A/H3N2 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the B/Yamagata strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Yamagata arm.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28-35
Seroresponse was defined as a ≥ 4-fold rise in HAI titer from baseline. Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for seroresponse to the B/Victoria strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Victoria arm.
Time frame: Day 28-35
The comparators to the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains were participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 28-35
The comparator for the B/Yamagata strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Yamagata arm.
Time frame: Day 28-35
The comparator for the B/Victoria strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Victoria arm.
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for the A/H1N1 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for the A/H3N2 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 28-35
Subjects with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for the B/Yamagata strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Yamagata arm.
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer ≤ 8 were considered to be serosusceptible for that strain. The comparator for the B/Victoria strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Victoria arm.
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for the A/H1N1 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for the A/H3N2 strain was participants in the All FluMist group (combined data for both FluMist arms).
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for the B/Yamagata strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Yamagata arm.
Time frame: Day 28-35
Participants with a baseline HAI titer > 8 were considered to be seropositive for that strain. The comparator for the B/Victoria strain was participants in the FluMist/B/Victoria arm.
Time frame: Days 0-14 post dose
Time frame: Days 0-28 post dose
Time frame: Days 0-28 post dose
Time frame: Days 0-180 post dose
Time frame: Days 0-180 post dose
MedImmune LLC
Industry
A Randomized, Partially Blind Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity of MEDI8662 in Adults 18 to 49 Years of Age
Acronym: MI-CP206
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00860067
Healthy or Stable Underlying Chronic Medical Condition, Infections
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial Details