Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01854528

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Three Experimental Drugs Compared With Telaprevir (a Licensed Product) for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Treatment-experienced Adults

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of 3 direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs; ABT-450/ritonavir/ABT-267 [ABT-450/r/ABT-267; ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir] and ABT-333 [also known as dasabuvir]) plus ribavirin (RBV) compared with telaprevir (TPV) with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV GT1) infection without cirrhosis who were previously treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

A randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and antiviral activity of the 3-DAA regimen (ABT-450/ritonavir/ABT-267 [ABT-450/r/ABT-267] and ABT-333) plus ribavirin (3-DAA/RBV) compared with the combination of telaprevir (TPV) with RBV and pegIFN (TPV/RBV) in noncirrhotic participants with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV GT1) infection who were previously treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (pegIFN/RBV).

Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 3-DAA/RBV (ABT-450/r/ABT-267 and ABT-333 plus RBV for 12 weeks) or TPV/RBV (TPV co-administered with pegIFN and RBV for 12 weeks, followed by followed by pegIFN and RBV for either 12 or 36 weeks, per local prescribing information).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Females must be practicing specific forms of birth control on study treatment, or be post-menopausal for more than 2 years or surgically sterile
  • Chronic hepatitis C infection (positive for anti-HCV antibody or HCV RNA at least 6 months before screening and at the time of screening; or positive for anti-HCV antibody or HCV RNA at the time of screening with a liver biopsy consistent with chronic HCV infection)
  • Screening laboratory result indicating HCV genotype 1 infection (HCV GT1)
  • Participant must have documentation of adherence to a prior pegIFN/RBV combination therapy and meet one of the protocol definitions for treatment failure: null responder, partial responder, relapser
  • No evidence of liver cirrhosis

Exclusion criteria

  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or anti-human immunodeficiency virus antibody
  • Positive screen for drugs or alcohol
  • Significant sensitivity to any drug
  • Use of contraindicated medications within 2 weeks of dosing
  • Abnormal laboratory tests

Treatment and study plan

ABT-450/r/ABT-267, ABT-333

Drug

Tablet; ABT-450 coformulated with ritonavir and ABT-267, ABT-333 tablet

Other names: ABT-267 also known as ombitasvir, ABT-450 also known as paritaprevir, ABT-333 also known as dasabuvir, Viekira PAK

Ribavirin

Drug

Tablet

Pegylated Interferon a-2a (PegINF)

Drug

Pre-filled syringe

Telaprevir

Drug

Film-coated tablet

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks After Treatment

    Time frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug

    The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The LLOQ for the assay was 25 IU/mL.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Final Treatment Visit in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36v2)

    Time frame: Baseline and Final Treatment Visit (up to Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and up to Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV)

    The SF-36v2 is a general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises a total of 36 items (questions) targeting a participant's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain scores were aggregated into an MCS score (from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental function and well-being).

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Final Treatment Visit in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey - Version 2 (SF-36v2)

    Time frame: Baseline and Final Treatment Visit (up to Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and up to Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV)

    The SF-36v2 is a general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument with extensive use in multiple disease states. The SF-36v2 instrument comprises a total of 36 items (questions) targeting a participant's functional health and well-being in 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health). Domain scores were aggregated into a PCS score (range = 0 to 100; a higher score indicates better mental function and well-being).

  3. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 24 Weeks After Treatment

    Time frame: 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug

    The percentage of participants with sustained virologic response (plasma Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCV RNA] level less than the lower limit of quantitation [< LLOQ]) 24 weeks after the last dose of study drug. The LLOQ for the assay was 25 IU/mL.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure During Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline to end of treatment (12 weeks for 3-DAA/RBV and 24 or 48 weeks for TPV/RBV)

    Virologic failure during treatment was defined as HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) confirmed greater than or equal to the lower limit of quantification (≥ LLOQ) after HCV RNA < LLOQ during treatment or confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ at the end of treatment.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Virologic Relapse After Treatment

    Time frame: Between end of treatment (Week 12 for 3-DAA/RBV and Week 24 or 48 for TPV/RBV) and Post-treatment (up to Week 12 Post-treatment)

    Participants who completed treatment with plasma HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) at the end of treatment were considered to have virologic relapse if they had confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ during the post-treatment period.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Open-Labeled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABT-450/Ritonavir/ABT-267 and ABT-333 Co-administered With Ribavirin Compared to Telaprevir Co-administered With Pegylated Interferon a-2a and Ribavirin in Treatment-Experienced Adults With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Virus Infection (MALACHITE-II)

Acronym: MALACHITE II

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2015
First posted
May 15, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 6, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.