Ruxolitinib Cream
DrugRuxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other names: INCB018424 cream
NCT Number: NCT05593445
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream in participants With Lichen Sclerosus. This is randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) study with a DBVC period of 12 weeks followed by an open label period (OLE) period of 12 weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
K. Papp Clinical Research, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.
Other names: INCB018424 cream
Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 12
ITCH4 response was defined as a ≥4-point improvement from Baseline in by-visit Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity. Participants rated itch severity of their lichen sclerosus by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described the worst level of itch they experienced in the past 24 hours.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 12
The CLISSCO is a validated tool to assess disease severity in vulvar lichen sclerosus. The Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score consists of 12 items divided into 3 sections: symptoms (3 items; likely reversible [i.e., itch, pain, dysuria]); signs (3 items; possibly reversible [i.e., whitening, petechiae/ecchymosis, fissures]); and architectural changes (6 items; irreversible [i.e., skin fusion, perianal involvement, etc.]). All symptoms, signs, and architectural changes were rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). The investigator documented the score of each of the 12 items; the CLISSCO was calculated by summing the score of each question, with a maximum score of 36 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more severe the disease. Additionally, the total score for each of the 3 sections (symptoms, signs, and architectural changes) was summarized by summing the scores of the questions in each section.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 12
Participants were instructed to complete and record the Skin Pain NRS in a diary each evening beginning on the day of screening through Week 12 or treatment discontinuation. Participants rated their pain, which included all types of pain (e.g., burning, tearing, pulling, stabbing, etc.) severity of lichen sclerosus by selecting a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) that best described the worst level of pain they experienced in the past 24 hours.
Time frame: up to 99.0 days
ITCH4 response was defined as a ≥4-point improvement from Baseline in by-visit Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity. Participants rated itch severity of their lichen sclerosus by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described the worst level of itch they experienced in the past 24 hours.
Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days
A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (v5.0) Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.
Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.
Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days
A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using the CTCAE v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.
Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days
The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.
Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days
The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.
Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days
The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.
Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days
The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.
Incyte Corporation
Industry
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Lichen Sclerosus
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02732145
Dermatitis, Female Urogenital Diseases
Zagreb, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT05010421
Lichen Sclerosus, Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus
Herne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05396261
Atrophic Vaginitis, Female Urogenital Diseases
Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT03665584
Lichen Sclerosus, Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial Details