Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05593445

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Lichen Sclerosus

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib cream in participants With Lichen Sclerosus. This is randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled (DBVC) study with a DBVC period of 12 weeks followed by an open label period (OLE) period of 12 weeks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

K. Papp Clinical Research, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Biopsy-proven LS in the anogenital area.
  • Baseline IGA score ≥ 2 for LS.
  • Baseline Itch NRS score ≥ 4 in anogenital area.
  • Willingness to avoid pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants who do not have LS involving anogenital area.
  • Concurrent conditions and history of other diseases:
  • Are suspected clinically (or confirmed diagnostically) of having alternative causes of vaginal symptoms including: candidiasis, chlamydia trachomatis, trichomonas vaginalis, neisseria gonorrhoeae, bacterial vaginosis, or herpes simplex.
  • Have active genital/vulvar lesions at screening and Day 1, not related to LS
  • Chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before baseline.
  • Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined criteria
  • Pregnant or lactating participants or those considering pregnancy during the period of their study participation..
  • Other exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Ruxolitinib Cream

Drug

Ruxolitinib cream is a topical formulation applied as a thin film to affected areas.

Other names: INCB018424 cream

Vehicle cream

Drug

Vehicle cream is matching in appearance to ruxolitinib cream and is to be applied in the same manner as ruxolitinib cream.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With ITCH4 at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

    ITCH4 response was defined as a ≥4-point improvement from Baseline in by-visit Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity. Participants rated itch severity of their lichen sclerosus by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described the worst level of itch they experienced in the past 24 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score (CLISSCO) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

    The CLISSCO is a validated tool to assess disease severity in vulvar lichen sclerosus. The Clinical Lichen Sclerosus Score consists of 12 items divided into 3 sections: symptoms (3 items; likely reversible [i.e., itch, pain, dysuria]); signs (3 items; possibly reversible [i.e., whitening, petechiae/ecchymosis, fissures]); and architectural changes (6 items; irreversible [i.e., skin fusion, perianal involvement, etc.]). All symptoms, signs, and architectural changes were rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (severe). The investigator documented the score of each of the 12 items; the CLISSCO was calculated by summing the score of each question, with a maximum score of 36 and a minimum score of 0. The higher the score, the more severe the disease. Additionally, the total score for each of the 3 sections (symptoms, signs, and architectural changes) was summarized by summing the scores of the questions in each section.

  2. Change From Baseline in the Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

    Participants were instructed to complete and record the Skin Pain NRS in a diary each evening beginning on the day of screening through Week 12 or treatment discontinuation. Participants rated their pain, which included all types of pain (e.g., burning, tearing, pulling, stabbing, etc.) severity of lichen sclerosus by selecting a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) that best described the worst level of pain they experienced in the past 24 hours.

  3. Time to Achieve ITCH4

    Time frame: up to 99.0 days

    ITCH4 response was defined as a ≥4-point improvement from Baseline in by-visit Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score. The Itch NRS is a daily participant-reported measure (24-hour recall) of the worst level of itch intensity. Participants rated itch severity of their lichen sclerosus by selecting a number from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch) that best described the worst level of itch they experienced in the past 24 hours.

  4. Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Period

    Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

  5. Number of Participants With Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE During the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Period

    Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days

    A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 (v5.0) Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.

  6. Number of Participants With Any TEAE During the Open-label Extension Period

    Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it is considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug.

  7. Number of Participants With Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE During the Open-label Extension Period

    Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days

    A TEAE was defined as an AE either reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first application of study drug. The severity of AEs was assessed using the CTCAE v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.

  8. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes Over Time in Clinical Laboratory Test Results During the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Period

    Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days

    The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.

  9. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes Over Time in Vital Sign Values During the Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Period

    Time frame: from Baseline to Week 12 plus 30 days

    The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.

  10. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes Over Time in Clinical Laboratory Test Results During the Open-label Extension Period

    Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days

    The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.

  11. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes Over Time in Vital Sign Values During the Open-label Extension Period

    Time frame: from Week 12 to Week 24 plus 30 days

    The investigator determined if a clinical laboratory test value was clinically meaningful.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Incyte Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Lichen Sclerosus

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 25, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.