Induction- PF-06480605 50 mg SC Q4W
DrugPF-06480605
NCT Number: NCT04090411
This phase 2b study is designed to have all subjects go into a 12 week induction period to compare different doses of study drug against placebo. After induction is complete all subjects will receive active therapy for 40 weeks, followed by a 12 week follow up period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PF-06480605
PF-06480605
PF-06480605
0 mg Placebo
PF-06480605
PF-06480605
PF-06480605
Time frame: At Week 14
Clinical remission was defined as total Mayo Score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and physician's global assessment (PGA) subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: From initiation of study treatment to either first dose in the chronic period or end of safety follow-up, whichever occurs first. (Approximately 16 weeks plus 12-week safety follow-up, if applicable.)
TEAEs was defined as all events that started on or after the first dosing day and time, but before the last dose plus the lag time. An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. Results may differ from publications that used Week 14 as the end of the AE reporting timeframe.
Time frame: From initiation of study treatment to either first dose in the chronic period or end of safety follow-up, whichever occurs first. (Approximately 16 weeks plus 12-week safety follow-up, if applicable.)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Results may differ from publications that used Week 14 as the end of the AE reporting timeframe.
Time frame: From initiation of study treatment to either first dose in the chronic period or end of safety follow-up, whichever occurs first. (Approximately 16 weeks plus 12-week safety follow-up, if applicable.)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Participants who had an AE/SAE that led to study discontinuation have been reported here. Results may differ from publications that used Week 14 as the end of the AE reporting timeframe.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment in the chronic period to end of safety follow-up. (Approximately 40 weeks plus 12-week safety follow-up.)
TEAEs was defined as all events that started on or after the first dosing day and time, but before the last dose plus the lag time. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. Results may differ from publications that used Week 56 as the end of the AE reporting timeframe.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment in the chronic period to end of safety follow-up. (Approximately 40 weeks plus 12-week safety follow-up.)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Results may differ from publications that used Week 56 as the end of the AE reporting timeframe.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment in the chronic period to end of safety follow-up. (Approximately 40 weeks plus 12-week safety follow-up.)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study intervention. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent disability/incapacity; or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Participants who had an AE/SAE that led to study discontinuation have been reported here. Results may differ from publications that used Week 56 as the end of the AE reporting timeframe.
Time frame: Induction Period: At Week 14; Chronic Period: At Week 56
Modified remission 1 was defined as an endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease), stool frequency subscore = 0 (normal number of stools per day), and rectal bleeding subscore = 0 (no blood seen) at Week 14/Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: Induction Period: At Week 14; Chronic Period: At Week 56
Modified remission 2 was defined as an endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease), ≥1 point decrease from baseline to achieve a stool frequency subscore = 0 (normal number of stools per day) or 1 (1 or 2 more stools than normal), and rectal bleeding subscore = 0 (no blood seen) at Week 14/Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: Induction Period: At Week 14; Chrnoic Period: At Week 56
Endoscopic improvement was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 (Normal or inactive disease) or 1 (Mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at Week 14/Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: Induction Period: At Week 14; Chronic Period: At Week 56
Endoscopic remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 (Normal or inactive disease) at Week 14/Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: Induction Period: 30 mins postdose on Day 1, Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 14; Chronic Period: 30 mins postdose on Weeks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48; End of Treatment (EOT) (Week 52) and Follow-up (FU) Visits 1 (Week 56), 2 (Week 60) and 3 (Week 64)
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 14
Samples were considered to be positive for ADA against PF-06480605 if the titer was ≥ 60, and an ADA sample was considered to be negative if the titer was < 60. Samples were considered to be positive for NAb against PF-06480605 if the titer was ≥ 5, and an NAb sample was considered to be negative if the titer was < 5.
Time frame: At Week 56
Clinical remission was defined as total Mayo Score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: At Weeks 14 and 56
Clinical remission was defined as total Mayo Score ≤2, with no individual subscore >1. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Participants with sustained clinical remission were defined as those who achieved clinical remission at both Weeks 14 and 56. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: At Weeks 14 and 56
Modified remission 1 was defined as an endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease), stool frequency subscore = 0 (normal number of stools per day), and rectal bleeding subscore = 0 (no blood seen) at Week 14/Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Participants with sustained clinical remission were defined as those who achieved clinical remission at both Weeks 14 and 56. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: At Weeks 14 and 56
Modified remission 2 was defined as an endoscopic subscore = 0 (normal or inactive disease) or 1 (mild disease), ≥1 point decrease from baseline to achieve a stool frequency subscore = 0 (normal number of stools per day) or 1 = 1 or 2 more stools than normal, and rectal bleeding subscore = 0 (no blood seen) at Week 14/Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity. Participants with sustained clinical remission were defined as those who achieved clinical remission at both Weeks 14 and 56. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: At Weeks 14 and 56
Endoscopic improvement was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 (Normal or inactive disease) or 1 (Mild disease [erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability]) at both Week 14 and Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Participants with sustained endoscopic improvement were defined as those who achieved improvement at both Weeks 14 and 56. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: At Weeks 14 and 56
Endoscopic remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 (Normal or inactive disease) at both Week 14 and Week 56. Mayo Score was a tool designed to measure disease activity for UC. The score ranges from 0 - 12 and was a composite of the four following assessments of disease activity: stool frequency subscore, rectal bleeding subscore, endoscopy subscore, and PGA subscore. Each of the four assessments was rated with a score from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. Participants with sustained endoscopic remission were defined as those who achieved endoscopic remission at both Weeks 14 and 56. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Time frame: Week 16 (baseline), Weeks 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, and 64
Time frame: Week 14 (baseline), Weeks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64
Time frame: Week 14 (baseline), Weeks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, and 64
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64
Time frame: Weeks 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60 and 64
Samples were considered to be positive for ADA against PF-06480605 if the titer was ≥ 60, and an ADA sample was considered to be negative if the titer was < 60. Samples were considered to be positive for NAb against PF-06480605 if the titer was ≥ 5, and an NAb sample was considered to be negative if the titer was < 5.
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Phase 2B, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate The Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of PF-06480605 in Adult Participants With Moderate To Severe Ulcerative Colitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04700449
Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06693908
Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05486104
Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial Details