Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00022672

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Herceptin® (Trastuzumab) in Combination With Arimidex® (Anastrozole) an Aromatase Inhibitor Compared to Arimidex® Alone in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

This 2 arm study assessed the safety and efficacy of adding intravenous trastuzumab (Herceptin®) to daily oral anastrozole (Arimidex®) tablets as first- and second-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (ER+ve and/or PR+ve). Patients were randomized to receive either anastrazole 1 mg per os (po) daily, or anastrazole 1 mg po daily + a loading dose of Herceptin® 4 mg/kg intravenous (iv) followed by weekly doses of Herceptin® 2 mg/kg iv. The anticipated time on study treatment was until disease progression, and the target sample size was 100-500 individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Box Hill, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • postmenopausal women;
  • metastatic breast cancer suitable for endocrine therapy;
  • positive hormone receptor status;
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression.

Exclusion criteria

  • patients on hormone replacement therapy;
  • previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease;
  • uncontrolled cardiac disease and history of cardiac failure.

Treatment and study plan

Trastuzumab (Herceptin®)

Drug

4mg/kg iv loading dose, followed by 2mg/kg iv weekly

Other names: Herceptin®

anastrazole (Arimidex®)

Drug

1 mg tablet taken orally daily

Other names: Arimidex®

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)

    PFS was assessed by the investigator based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using radiographic tumor evaluations. Disease progression was defined as the appearance of any new lesion not previously identified or an estimated increase of 25% or more in existent bidimensionally or unidimensionally measurable lesions or progression of an existing non-measurable lesion. For bidimensionally measurable malignant lesions with an area of at least 2.0 centimeters squared (cm^2) an increase of 1.0 cm^2 was required and for unidimensionally measurable lesions of 1.0 cm or less an increase of 0.5 cm was required. PFS was defined as the number of days between date of randomization and date of documented disease progression or date of death. Kaplan Meier estimates of PFS are presented.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit

    Time frame: 24 Months, End of Study (Up to 5 years)

    Clinical Benefit was defined as stable disease for ≥ six months or complete response or partial response.

  2. Duration of Response at 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 Months

    Duration of response was defined as the number of days from the day complete response or partial response was first noted to the day of progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  3. Time to Response at 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 Months

    Time to response was defined as the number of days from the day of randomization to the day complete response or partial response was first noted.

  4. Overall Survival at 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 Months

    Overall Survival is defined as the number of days from randomization to death.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Two-Year Survival

    Time frame: 24 Months

  6. Percentage of Participants With Overall Tumor Response at 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 Months

    Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Overall Response was defined as either complete response or partial response.

  7. Percentage of Participants With Best Tumor Response at 24 Months

    Time frame: 24 Months

    Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Best Response was defined as the best response a patient achieves in the study.

  8. Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Final Visit Compared to Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Up to 24 Months)

    Participants rated their performance status using the ECOG Questionnaire on the following scale: 0=Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; 2=Ambulatory, capable of self-care, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than >50% of waking hours; 3=Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair >50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair; 5=Dead.

    The percentage of participants in the following categories:

    Improved: Score decrease from baseline. Unchanged: Score the same as baseline. Worse: Score increase from baseline.

  9. Duration of Response at End of Study

    Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)

    Duration of response was defined as the number of days from the day complete response or partial response was first noted to the day of progression of disease, death or last follow-up.

  10. Time to Response at End of Study

    Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)

    Time to response was defined as the number of days from the day of randomization to the day complete response or partial response was first noted.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Overall Tumor Response at End of Study

    Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)

    Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Overall Response was defined as either complete response or partial response.

  12. Percentage of Participants With Best Tumor Response at End of Study

    Time frame: End of Study (Up to 5 years)

    Tumor Response levels were determined by the investigator and an Independent Response Evaluation Committee and Reconciled. Best Response was defined as the best response a patient achieves in the study.

  13. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: Throughout the Study (Up to 5 years)

    Number of participants with adverse events as a measure for safety as assessed by the collection of adverse events, laboratory tests for Hematology and Serum Chemistry, clinical assessments and cardiac monitoring.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Collaborators

  • Genentech, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of Herceptin Plus Arimidex Compared With Arimidex Alone on Progression-free Survival in Patients With HER2-positive and Hormone-receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2001
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jan 27, 2003
Registry last updated
Jun 13, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.