Erenumab
BiologicalAdministered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff.
Other names: AMG 334, Aimovig™
NCT Number: NCT02066415
To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on the change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine days in adults with chronic migraine.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Research Site, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This study consisted of the following phases: screening, 4-week baseline phase, 12-week double-blind treatment, and 12-week follow-up. Participants may have elected to participate in the optional pharmacokinetic substudy and the optional, novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment substudy.
Participants who completed the 12-week double-blind treatment phase of Study 20120295 were eligible to enroll in an open-label extension study (Study 20130255; NCT02174861).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff.
Other names: AMG 334, Aimovig™
Administered once a month subcutaneously by authorized investigational site study staff.
Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine with or without aura.
The change from baseline in monthly migraine days was calculated as the number of migraine days during the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase - the number of migraine days during the 4-week baseline phase.
Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase
A migraine day was any calendar day in which the participant experienced a qualified migraine headache (onset, continuation, or recurrence of the migraine headache). A qualified migraine headache was defined either as a migraine without aura or a migraine with aura. Monthly migraine days were calculated as the number of migraine days in the 4-week baseline phase and during the last 4 weeks of treatment.
At least a 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days was determined if the change in monthly migraine days from the 4-week baseline phase to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase * 100 / baseline monthly migraine days was less than or equal to -50%.
Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase
Monthly acute migraine-specific medication treatment days is the number of days on which migraine specific medications were used between monthly doses of study drug. Migraine-specific medications includes two categories of medications: triptan-based migraine medications and ergotamine-based migraine medications.
Time frame: 4-week baseline phase and the last 4 weeks of the 12-week treatment phase
The cumulative duration of any qualified headache between monthly doses of study drug regardless of acute treatment use.
A qualified headache was defined as follows:
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 16 weeks after the last dose (24 weeks)
Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, where:
Grade 1 = Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; Grade 2 = Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24
Blood samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against erenumab. Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay).
Developing antibody incidence indicates participants with a negative or no result at baseline and a positive result at any time post-baseline.
If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
Amgen
Industry
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG 334 in Chronic Migraine Prevention
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02174861
Treatment for Prevention of Chronic Migraine
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial Details