Atezolizumab
DrugAtezolizumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Tecentriq
NCT Number: NCT03726879
This study (also known as IMpassion050) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab compared with placebo when given in combination with neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline (doxorubicin) + cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (ddAC-PacHP) in patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer (T2-4, N1-3, M0).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Hospital Sao Rafael - HSR, Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Related to Trastuzumab Emtansine in the Adjuvant Setting:
Atezolizumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Tecentriq
Placebo matched to atezolizumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Doxorubicin will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Adriamycin
Cyclophosphamide will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Cytoxan, Neosar
Paclitaxel will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Taxol
Trastuzumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Herceptin
Pertuzumab will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Other names: Perjeta
Participants without pCR have the option of receiving adjuvant atezolizumab/placebo combined with Trastuzumab Emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV Q3W.
Other names: Kadcyla
Time frame: From randomization to approximately 6 months
pCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] staging system, 8th edition). Treatment comparison was made using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor (ER) positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR) positive vs. ER negative and PgR negative).
Time frame: From randomization to approximately 6 months
pCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] staging system, 8th edition). Treatment comparison was made using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by disease stage (T2 vs. T3-4) and hormone receptor status (ER positive and/or PgR positive vs. ER negative and PgR negative).
Time frame: From randomization to approximately 24 months
pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) based upon hormone receptor status (estrogen receptor [ER]/progesterone receptor [PgR] positive or ER/PgR negative).
Time frame: From randomization to approximately 24 months
pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) in the IC 0 Population
Time frame: From randomization to first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
EFS defined as the time from randomization to the first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in all patients and based upon hormone receptor status (ER/PgR positive or ER/PgR negative) and PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).
Time frame: Time from surgery to first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
DFS defined as the time from surgery to the first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, in all patients who undergo surgery and based upon PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).
Time frame: From randomization to date of death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
OS defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause in all participants and based upon PD-L1 status (IC 0; IC 1/2/3).
Time frame: Baseline; Day 1 of Cycle 1-9, on Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter until Cycle 22; at the treatment discontinuation or early termination visit and follow up visit. Cycle 1-4, each cycle is 14 days. Cycle 5-22, each cycle is 21 days.
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported questionnaire that included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), global health scale/quality of life (GHS/QOL) and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Questions 1-28 on the QLQ-C30 were on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Questions 29-30 (GHS scale) were on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). For this instrument, GHS/QOL and functional scales were linearly transformed so each score ranged 0-100, where lower scores indicate poorer functioning (e.g., worsening) and higher scores indicate better functioning (e.g., improvement).
Time frame: Baseline; Day 1 of Cycle 1-9, on Day 1 of every other cycle thereafter until Cycle 22; at the treatment discontinuation or early termination visit and follow up visit. Cycle 1-4, each cycle is 14 days. Cycle 5-22, each cycle is 21 days.
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a self-reported questionnaire that included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), GHS/QOL and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Questions 1-28 on the QLQ-C30 were on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Questions 29-30 (GHS scale) were on a 7-point scale (1=Very Poor to 7=Excellent). For this instrument, GHS/QOL and functional scales were linearly transformed so each score ranged 0-100, where lower scores indicate poorer functioning (e.g., worsening) and higher scores indicate better functioning (e.g., improvement).
Time frame: From randomization up end of study (approximately 4 years and 7 months)
Time frame: 30 minutes post infusion on Day 1 Cycle (C) 1.
Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 Cycle (C) 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, ATDV (an average of 1 year). C 2-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-16, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).
Cmin is the minimum (or trough) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 Cycle (C) 8, 12, and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).
Cmax is the maximum (or peak) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).
Cmin is the minimum (or trough) concentration that a study drug achieves in the body.
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle (C) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-16, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).
Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Time frame: Day 1 Cycle (C) 1, 8, 12 and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).
Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle (C) 1, 8, 12, and at treatment discontinuation visit (ATDV) (an average of 1 year). C 1-4, each C is 14 days. C 8-12, each C is 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required ATDV/completion (an average of 1 year).
Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 9 and Cycle 12, at treatment disontinuation visit (an average of 1 year). Cycle 9 and 12 are each 21 days. With protocol version 5, collection is only required at the time of treatment discontinuation/completion (an average of 1 year).
Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-positive if they were ADA-negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following study drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA-positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post-baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be treatment-emergent ADA-negative if they were ADA-negative or were missing data at baseline and all post-baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA-positive at baseline but did not have any post-baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer units greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Time frame: From randomization to approximately 24 months
pCR is defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes following completion of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) (i.e., ypT0/is ypN0 in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] staging system, 8th edition).
Time frame: From randomization to first documented disease recurrence, unequivocal tumor progression determined by the treating investigator, or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
Time frame: Time from surgery to first documented disease recurrence or death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
Time frame: From randomization to date of death from any cause (up to approximately 54 months)
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Of Atezolizumab or Placebo in Combination With Neoadjuvant Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide Followed By Paclitaxel + Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab In Early Her2-Positive Breast Cancer
Acronym: IMpassion050
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05754658
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07040514
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06604858
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
A Coruña, Spain
View Trial Details