Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine
DeviceInjectable gel that is a sterile, biodegradable, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogeneous gel implant (dermal filler).
NCT Number: NCT03796728
This is an open-label, multi-center, study where eligible participants will undergo treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injected into the lips for lip augmentation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Clinica Milenio, Lisbon, Portugal
This is a prospective, open-label, multi-center, interventional, medical device, post-marketing study. Each participant will act as his/her own control. Eligible participants will undergo treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injected into the lips for lip augmentation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Injectable gel that is a sterile, biodegradable, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogeneous gel implant (dermal filler).
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30
The LFS2 is an Investigator assessment of overall lip fullness measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour; minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) compared to Baseline are reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Time frame: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Time frame: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Time frame: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Time frame: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Time frame: Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Allergan
Industry
LIPS: A Prospective, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine for Lip Augmentation
Acronym: LIPS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06961305
Aesthetic, Lip Augmentation
Katowice, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05342753
Lip Augmentation
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06858007
Lip Augmentation
Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT04540913
Lip, Lip Augmentation
Bradenton, Florida, United States
View Trial Details