Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02004093

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of the Combination of Pertuzumab With Carboplatin-Based Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab in combination with carboplatin-based standard chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • histologically confirmed ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer;
  • only 1 previous regimen, which must be platinum-based;
  • platinum-sensitive disease which is defined by a progression-free interval of greater than 6 months after completion of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • previous radiotherapy;
  • previous treatment with an anti-cancer vaccine or any targeted therapy;
  • major surgery or traumatic injury within 4 weeks of study;
  • history or evidence of central nervous system metastases.

Treatment and study plan

Pertuzumab

Drug

Loading dose of 840 mg IV, followed by 420 mg IV every 3 weeks

paclitaxel

Drug

175 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

Gemcitabine

Drug

1000 mg/m2 IV Day 1 and 8 of each cycle for 6 cycles

carboplatin

Drug

Target AUC of 5 following paclitaxel or AUC of 4 following gemcitabine IV every 3 weeks for 6 cycles

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks

    Disease progression was assessed according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors), for participants with measurable disease, or by changes in CA 125 (Cancer Antigen 125) according to GCIG (Gynecologic Cancer Inter Group) for all participants. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored at the time of the last valid tumor assessment or valid CA 125 assessment.

  2. Progression-Free Survival

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from first administration of study drug (Study Day 1) to documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier. Disease progression was assessed according to RECIST, for participants with measurable disease, or by changes in CA 125 according to GCIG for all participants. Participants who did not progress or died while being followed were censored at the time of the last valid tumor assessment or valid CA 125 assessment.

  3. Kaplan-Meier Probability of No Disease or Progression at 1 Year

    Time frame: 1 year

    The probability of being event free (no disease progression or death events) at 1 year in participants remaining at risk.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Confirmed Response Based on Combined CA 125 and RECIST Measurements

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks

    Response by tumor measurement occurred if there was documented and confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). For all participants, response was assessed by both the RECIST and by CA 125 levels, according to whether the participant had measurable or non-measurable disease at baseline. Response according to CA 125 levels was defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline. The decrease had to be confirmed and maintained for at least 28 days. The confirmatory sample must have been less than or equal to the previous sample (within an assay variability of 10%). For overall response, the response categories were "response", "stable disease" and "progressive disease". Stable disease included 1) stable disease as defined by RECIST for solid tumors and 2) CA 125 levels that had not met the definition of "response" or "progressive disease".

  2. Duration of Response

    Time frame: Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all Cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression up to 104 weeks

    For participants who achieved a response, the duration of response was defined as the interval between initial documentation of response to the first documentation of disease progression or death. Participants who responded and did not progress or die while on study or while being followed were censored at the last valid tumor or CA 125 measurement.

  3. Kaplan-Meier Probability of Maintaining a Response to at Least 1 Year

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression

    Disease progression was assessed according to RECIST, for participants with measurable disease, or by changes in CA 125 according to GCIG for all participants. Participants who did not progress while being followed were censored at the time of the last valid tumor assessment or valid CA 125 assessment.

  5. Time to Progressive Disease

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until disease progression

    The time to progressive disease is the interval of time from date of first dose of study medication to date of first documentation of progressive disease by either RECIST or CA 125 criteria. Participants who never progressed while being followed were censored at the last valid tumor measurement or CA 125 measurement.

  6. Kaplan-Meier Probability of Being Progression Free at 1 Year

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Time To Response

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment

    Time to response was the date of first dose of study medication to the date of the first documentation of response, according to CA 125 criteria for all participants or response according to RECIST criteria for participants with measurable disease. If response was evaluable by both criteria, then the date of response was for the earlier of the two events.

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Died

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment

  9. Overall Survival

    Time frame: Screening and Day 15 of Cycles 2, 4, 6, and Day 15 of all cycles from Cycle 7 to 17 until 2 years after last dose of treatment

    Survival was the interval of time from date of first dose of study medication to date of death at any time. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact when they were known to be alive.

  10. Kaplan-Meier Probability of Being Alive at 1 Year

    Time frame: 1 year

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of Omnitarg in Combination With Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy Versus Carboplatin-based Therapy Alone on Treatment Response in Patients With Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Dec 6, 2013
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.