Salus Research
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
NCT Number: NCT06048809
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a toothpaste containing stannous fluoride (SnF2) over time on the oral bacterial composition and activity and to explore its effect in comparison to a regular fluoride toothpaste.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
This will be a single-center, 6-week, randomized, controlled, analyst and examiner-blind, two treatment, parallel group design, methodology development clinical study, investigating the efficacy of a toothpaste containing 0.454 percent (%) SnF2 in healthy adult participants with mild-moderate gingivitis. The study will describe and compare the overall oral bacterial composition and activity following 6 weeks use of a 0.454 % SnF2 toothpaste and regular fluoride toothpaste (control) using microbial and functional profiling techniques. Participants will be instructed to brush twice daily (morning and evening) in their usual manner, for 1-timed minute, for 6 weeks and to record each brushing in the diary provided. Sufficient participants will be screened to ensure approximately 50 participants complete the entire study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
At Screening (Visit 1):
Exclusion criteria
Sensodyne Repair and Protect toothpaste containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SnF2.
Colgate Cavity Protection containing 1100 ppm fluoride as SMFP.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Alpha diversity was defined as species diversity in sites or habitats and was used to describe the overall oral bacterial composition. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) and microbial profiling (16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid [rRNA] gene amplicon analysis) was performed to identify the bacteria present within a given sample down to the genus and/or species level. Alpha diversity (overall) was measured using Shannon index. Shannon Index was derived as the negative of the sum of the p*ln(p) across all species in the sample where p was the proportion of the sample made up from each species. Index scores ranged from 0 to ln(S) where S was the number of species in the sample. Higher values indicated greater diversity and a more complex community with a more even distribution of species. Lower values indicated lower diversity, suggesting dominance by a few species or a less complex community.
Time frame: Week 6
Alpha diversity was defined as species diversity in sites or habitats and was used to describe the overall oral bacterial composition. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) and microbial profiling (16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis) was performed to identify the bacteria present within a given sample down to the genus and/or species level. Alpha diversity (overall) was measured using Shannon index. Shannon Index was derived as the negative of the sum of the p*ln(p) across all species in the sample where p was the proportion of the sample made up from each species. Index scores ranged from 0 to ln(S) where S was the number of species in the sample. Higher values indicated greater diversity and a more complex community with a more even distribution of species. Lower values indicated lower diversity, suggesting dominance by a few species or a less complex community.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Analysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction, version 2 (ANCOM-BC2) method was used to identify bacterial species that were differentially abundant between Baseline and Week 6. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) at the indicated timepoints, and differential abundance analysis was performed. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 6. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Log-fold change from Baseline in abundance (overall) for each bacterial group was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
ANCOM-BC2 method was used to identify bacterial species that were differentially abundant between Baseline and Week 6. Samples were collected from 4 different areas of mouth (tongue, supragingival plaque, subgingival surface, and saliva) at the indicated timepoints, and differential abundance analysis was performed. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 6. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Log-fold change from Baseline in abundance (overall) for each bacterial group was reported.
HALEON
Industry
A Randomised, Controlled, Examiner Blind, Methodology Development Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste on the Oral Microbiome
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06819761
Delivery Systems, Oral Health
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07611292
Matrix Metalloproteinase, Oral Health
Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07565766
Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque
Zagreb, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT07147244
Adolescent, Child
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details