Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01199289

A Study to Evaluate the Dosing of AMG 827 for Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Asthma

The purpose of this study is to determine if AMG 827 is effective compared to placebo as measured by change in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) composite scores.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Research Site, Feldbach, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women 18 to 65 years of age
  • Percent of predicted FEV1 ≥ 50% and ≤ 80%
  • At least 12% reversibility over pre-bronchodilator FEV1
  • Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) ≥ 200 and ≤ 1000 µg/day fluticasone powder or equivalent
  • Ongoing asthma symptoms with ACQ composite score ≥ 1.5 points

Exclusion criteria

  • Respiratory infection within 4 weeks of screening visit or 1 week of baseline visit
  • History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or other chronic pulmonary condition other than asthma
  • Any uncontrolled or clinically significant systemic disease (eg, uncontrolled diabetes, liver disease)

Treatment and study plan

AMG 827

Drug

SC injection.

Placebo

Drug

SC injection.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Scores to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The ACQ is an instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment.

    It is a validated composite score that assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon awakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).

    The response options for all these questions range from zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/limitation) scale. The total score is obtained by adding the value from each question and dividing by the number of questions. Higher scores indicates worsening of condition and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Pre- and Post-Bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    FEV1 is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out in one second, after full inspiration. FEV1 was performed both pre and post-administration of bronchodilator treatment at Baseline and Week 12.

  2. Change From Baseline in AM and PM Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Change From Baseline in the Frequency of Rescue Short Acting β-Agonist (SABA) Use to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Participants recorded SABA use for 1 week prior to randomization (baseline) and the average number of days recorded was subtracted from average days of SABA use across 12 week intervention period.

  4. Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score to Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    Participants recorded their daily asthma symptoms in their electronic diaries (Ediary). It included 7 questions: frequency of night time awakening, time awake at night, wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness and activity limitation.

    Daily asthma symptoms score is the sum of 7 individual scores (with the total score ranging from 0-21).

    Higher scores indicates worsening of condition and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  5. Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

    The AQLQ is the most commonly used asthma specific instrument and includes evaluations of both symptom and quality of life measures. The 32-item instrument measures 4 domains affected by asthma including activity limitations, emotional function, exposure to environmental stimuli, and symptoms (Mitchell EA et al, 1997, Juniper et al, 1994, Christie MJ et al, 1993, Juniper et al, 1993).

    Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (7=no impairment, 1=severe impairment). The overall score = mean of the responses to the 32 questions.

    Higher scores indicate "better quality of life" and a positive change from baseline indicates improved symptoms.

  6. Proportion of Asthma Symptom-free Days

    Time frame: Up to Week 12

    Asthma symptom-free days were defined as a participant having a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom score. Asthma symptom-free days without SABA use were defined as a participant having a score of zero in their daily asthma symptom score and no SABA use.

    The proportion of asthma symptom-free days was calculated as the number of asthma symptom-free days over the number of days in the double-blind treatment period (12 weeks).

  7. Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10

    Time frame: Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10

  8. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10

    Time frame: Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10

  9. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of AMG 827 at Week 8 to 10

    Time frame: Week 8 (days 60 and 64), and pre-dose on Week 10

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of AMG 827 in Subjects With Inadequately Controlled Asthma

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Sep 10, 2010
Registry last updated
Nov 26, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.