Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04193527

A Study to Evaluate the Diagnostic Efficacy of DaTSCAN™ Ioflupane (123I) Injection in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) for the Diagnosis of Parkinsonian Syndrome (PS) in Chinese Patients

This is a multicenter, open-label, non-controlled, non-randomized, phase 3 clinical study to compare the SPECT findings after a single IV administration of DaTSCAN™ ioflupane (123I) injection for patients with a clinical diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome (PS) involving striatal dopaminergic deficit (SDD; specifically, Parkinson's disease [PD] [SDD], multiple system atrophy [MSA] [SDD] or or progressive supranuclear palsy [PSP] [SDD]) as compared with patients with a clinical diagnosis of essential tremor (ET) (no SDD) and age-matched healthy controls.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

For all participants:

  • Chinese male or female, aged 40 to 80 years, has agreed to sign and date the written informed consent form.

For Healthy Volunteers:

  • Non-patient volunteers with good age-appropriate health as established by clinical examination during screening and no evidence of movement disorder by complete neurological evaluation.

For participants with Parkinson's disease:

  • A diagnosis of clinically established or clinically probable PD in accordance with the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease.

For participants with MSA (SDD):

  • A diagnosis of probable or possible MSA in accordance with the Second Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis of MSA.

For participants with PSP (SDD):

  • A diagnosis of probable or possible PSP in accordance with the Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Society for PSP (NINDS-SPSP)

For participants with ET (no SDD):

  • A diagnosis of definite or probable ET in accordance with the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor (WHIGET) diagnostic criteria for ET (no SDD) .

Exclusion criteria

  • The participant is lactating.
  • The participant is pregnant as detected by a β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test.
  • A cerebral structural vascular abnormality indicative of at least 1 infarction in the region of the basal ganglia (including the internal capsule) ≥5 mm has been confirmed, preferably by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed within 6 months of screening. If an MRI is not clinically feasible, cerebral CT imaging within 6 months is also acceptable.
  • The participant is diagnosed with major neurocognitive disorder by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5 criteria, or Mini-Mental State Examination total score is <24.
  • Participant is being investigated for or has been diagnosed and/or is being treated for repeated stroke with stepwise progression of Parkinson features.
  • History of repeated head injury (≥3 concussions, or history of professional sports with repeated head trauma [e.g., boxing]).
  • History of definite encephalitis (≥1 episode of confirmed encephalitis with objective residual neurologic deficit).
  • The participant is using or has insufficient washout from medication known or suspected to interact with striatal uptake through direct competition with binding of DaTSCAN™ to the dopamine transporters (i.e., amphetamine, benztropine, bupropion, cocaine, mazindol, methylphenidate, phentermine, sertraline, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) before the imaging visit.
  • The participant is using Chinese traditional medicine for PD treatment, which cannot be safely withdrawn for at least 1 week (7 days) before the imaging visit.
  • The participant has a moderate to severe renal impairment (e.g., serum creatinine >1.5x upper limit of normal [ULN], blood urea nitrogen [BUN] >30 mg/dL).
  • The participant has a moderate to severe hepatic impairment (bilirubin >2x ULN and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST)>3x ULN).
  • The participant has a history of current abuse of drugs and/or alcohol (for the previous 12 months before trial enrolment).
  • The participant has a history of occupational exposure to any radiation >50 millisievert/year (mSv/year).
  • The participant has been previously enrolled in this study or participated in a clinical study involving an investigational pharmaceutical product within 30 days prior to screening and/or any radiopharmaceutical within a minimum of 5 radioactive half-lives prior to screening.
  • The participant presents with symptoms suggestive of corticobasal degeneration or Huntington's disease.
  • The participant has known allergies to the investigational medicinal product (IMP).
  • The participant presents with any clinically active, serious, life-threatening disease with a life expectancy of less than 12 months.
  • Any laboratory value(s) exceeding the limits of normality if deemed to be clinically relevant by the investigator.
  • The participant complains of claustrophobia.
  • The participant has a moderate to severe thyroid disease (thyroid stimulating hormone [TSH] exceeding the limits of normality by more than 10%), if deemed to be clinically relevant by the investigator.

For participants with ET:

  • The participant has at least 1 first-degree relative diagnosed with PD.

For Healthy Volunteers:

  • History of psychiatric illness.

For all participants:

  • It is the physician's best judgment not to include the participant in the trial.

Treatment and study plan

DaTSCAN™ Ioflupane (123I) Injection

Drug

All participants (Participants with PS, ET, and HV) received a single dose of DaTSCAN™ ioflupane (123I) injection within the range of 111 to 185 megabecquerel (MBq) (3 to 5 millicurie [mCi]) per participant at a maximum volume of 5 milliliter [mL]) intravenously on Day 1.

Other names: Ioflupane (123I)

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity Analysis of the Blinded Independent Read of DaTSCAN™ SPECT Images

    Time frame: At Day 1

    Sensitivity was defined as positive percentage agreement and calculated as the number of true positives (TP) / (number of TP + number of false negatives [FN]): TP/(TP + FN), and a 2-sided 95% binomial confidence interval constructed around it. Only the participants with a clinical diagnosis of PS were included in the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity of the blinded independent read of DaTSCAN™ SPECT images in detecting or excluding striatal dopaminergic deficit (SDD), when the clinical diagnosis as established by the investigator was used as the standard of truth, were summarized with by reader. Each participant's SPECT image was read by 3 blinded readers.

  2. Specificity Analysis of the Blinded Independent Read of DaTSCAN™ SPECT Images

    Time frame: At Day 1

    Specificity was defined as negative percentage agreement and calculated as the number of true negatives (TN) / (number of TN + number of false positives [FP]): TN/(TN + FP), and a 2-sided 95% binomial confidence interval constructed around it. For the specificity analysis, only participants with a clinical diagnosis of ET were included; the HVs were excluded from this analysis. The specificity of the blinded independent read of DaTSCAN™ SPECT images in detecting or excluding striatal dopaminergic deficit (SDD), when the clinical diagnosis as established by the investigator was used as the standard of truth, were summarized with by reader. Each participant's SPECT image was read by 3 blinded readers.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Normalized DaTSCAN™ Uptake Based on Region Of Interest (ROI) With Central Read (by Semi-quantitative Assessment by Use of DaTQUANT™) of DaTSCAN™ SPECT Images

    Time frame: At Day 1

    A semi-quantitative analysis of the striatal uptake ratios in specific regions of interest (ROIs, i.e., left and right striatum, caudate, and putamen) of DaTSCAN™ SPECT images was performed with DaTQUANT™.

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and Serious TEAEs

    Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to Day 4

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this investigational product (IP) or medicinal product. A Serious Adverse Event(SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one, more of the following criteria: results in death, life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent, significant disability/incapacity, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, an important medical event. A TEAE was any event emerging or manifesting at or after the initiation of treatment with an IP or medicinal product or any existing event that worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the IP or medicinal product. Number of participants with TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

GE Healthcare

Industry

Collaborators

  • PPD Development, LP

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicentre, Phase 3, Clinical Study to Compare the Striatal Uptake of a Dopamine Transporter Radioligand, DaTSCAN™ Ioflupane (123I) Injection, After Intravenous Administration to Chinese Patients With a Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, or Essential Tremor and to Healthy Controls

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 10, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 16, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.