Enzalutamide
DrugParticipants received 160 mg of enzalutamide (soft capsules) orally once daily.
Other names: MDV3100, Xtandi
NCT Number: NCT02116582
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enzalutamide treatment in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with abiraterone acetate.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 4
Site BE32001, Brussels, Flemish Brabant, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants received 160 mg of enzalutamide (soft capsules) orally once daily.
Other names: MDV3100, Xtandi
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to treatment discontinuation or the data cut-off date of 08 May 2016, whichever occurred first; the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.
Radiographic PFS, was defined as the time from first dose to the first objective evidence of radiographic disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. For patients with no documented progression event, it was censored on the date of the last disease assessment performed prior to the analysis data cut-off point. Radiographic progression (RP) for soft tissue disease was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) V1.1 criteria. RP for bone disease was determined according to the consensus guidelines of a modification of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2) guidelines. The 50th percentile of Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates was used as the estimate of the rPFS median. A 2-sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was provided for this estimate using the Brookmeyer & Crowley (BC) method.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to the data cut-off date of 08 May 2016; up to 2 years.
OS was defined as the time from first dose to death from any cause. All events of death were included. If patients discontinued study drug before the analysis data cut-off point, only OS status was assessed every 12 weeks until the data cut-off point date or until death, whichever occurred first. For patients who were alive at the time of the analysis data cut-off point, the OS time was censored on the last date the patient was known to be alive. Death from any cause was included, regardless of whether the event occurred while the patient was still taking study drug or after the patient discontinued study drug. OS median was estimated using the KM method. A 2-sided 95% CI was provided for this estimate using the BC method.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to the data cut-off date for end-of-study completion 29 Sep 2017; the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.
PSA response was defined as at least a 50% decrease from baseline in PSA, and was a binary variable for achieving this criteria (or not) based on the lowest PSA value observed postbaseline. Participants with no postbaseline PSA value were regarded as non-responders. 95% CI for PSA response rate was computed using the Clopper-Pearson method based on the exact binomial distribution.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to the data cut-off date of 08 May 2016; the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.
The time to PSA progression was calculated as the time interval from the date of first dose to the date of first observation of PSA progression. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 μg/L (i.e., 2 ng/mL or more) above the nadir or above the baseline value for patients who did not have a decline in PSA postbaseline values, and which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 or more weeks later (i.e., a confirmed rising trend) (PCWG2 criteria). The 50th percentile of KM estimates was used as the estimate of the time to PSA progression median. A 2-sided 95% CI was provided for this estimate using the BC method.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug administration up to data cut-off date for end-of-study completion (29 Sep 2017); the median duration of treatment was 5.7 months.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event occurring or worsening between the start of study treatment date and the latest date of 30 days after the last dose date or the 30-day follow-up visit date, and not later than the data cut-off date or the date of death. AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, were graded using the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) guidelines (V4.03).
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Industry
A Multi-center, Single Arm Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Progressive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Abiraterone Acetate
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04751929
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05005728
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06104449
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT02044354
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Villejuif, Val de Marne, France
View Trial Details