Novartis Pharmaceuticals
East Hanover, New Jersey, United States
NCT Number: NCT00758524
This study was a proof-of-efficacy, dose finding study of LCI699 in participants with mild-to-moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension in order to assess the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect, safety and tolerability of LCI699 as compared to placebo and eplerenone.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
East Hanover, New Jersey, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
LCI699 oral capsules
Eplerenone oral capsules
LCI699-matching placebo oral capsules
Eplerenone-matching placebo oral capsules
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Automated arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the 4th working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV, using an automated BP device (such as the Omron BP monitor). The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSDBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as factors and baseline MSDBP level as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Automated arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the 4th working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV, using an automated BP device (such as the Omron BP monitor). The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSSBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and region as factors and baseline MSSBP levels as a covariate.
Time frame: AEs: From start of the study drug treatment up to 8 weeks; SAE: From signing of the informed consent up to 8 weeks
An AE was an adverse medical event which occurs in a participant of the study and which is not necessarily in a causal relationship with the treatment the participant receives. SAEs were AEs leading to death, are life-threatening, require hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalizations, represent an innate malformation or a congenital abnormality.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Automated arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the 4th working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV, using an automated BP device (such as the Omron BP monitor). The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSDBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as factors and baseline MSDBP level as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Automated arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the 4th working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV, using an automated BP device (such as the Omron BP monitor). The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSSBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and region as factors and baseline MSSBP levels as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
An ABPM measured a participant's BP over a 24-hour period readings using an automated validated monitoring device from Baseline to Week 8. The 24-hour SBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory SBP readings for the 24-hour period.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
An ABPM measured a participant's BP over a 24-hour period readings using an automated validated monitoring device from Baseline to Week 8. The 24-hour DBP was calculated by taking the mean of all ambulatory DBP readings for the 24-hour period.
Time frame: Baseline, every hour up to 24 hours post-dose at Week 8
Trough to peak ratios were derived from an ANCOVA model containing treatment, region, hour, treatment by hour interaction as factors with Baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, every hour up to 24 hours post-dose at Week 8
Trough to peak ratios were derived from an ANCOVA model containing treatment, region, hour, treatment by hour interaction as factors with Baseline as a covariate.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
Change from baseline was analyzed using plasma aldosterone values measured at Baseline and Week 8.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
MSDBP response was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSDBP <90 mmHg or a >=10 mmHg reduction from Baseline. MSDBP control was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSDBP <90 mmHg.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8
MSSBP response was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSSBP <140 mmHg or a >=20 mmHg reduction from baseline reduction from baseline. MSSBP control was defined as the percentage of participants with a MSSBP <140 mmHg.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 hour post-dose at Week 8
The ACTH stimulation cortisol test was a standard procedure to measure the ability of adrenal cortex to respond to exogenous ACTH and directly assess the adrenal reserve. Serum cortisol concentrations at 1 hour after injection were measured to assess the maximum stimulated cortisol level achieved. Potential adrenal suppression was indicated if the serum cortisol concentration was <500 nanomoles per liter (nmol/L) at 1 hour after the injection.
Time frame: From Week 8 to Week 9
Automated arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the 4th working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV, using an automated BP device (such as the Omron BP monitor). The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 9 readings to the readings taken at Week 8 (Baseline). The change from Week 8 to week 9 in MSDBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and region as factors and Week 8 MSDBP level as a covariate.
Time frame: From Week 8 to Week 9
Automated arterial BP determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the 4th working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV, using an automated BP device (such as the Omron BP monitor). The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 9 readings to the readings taken at Week 8 (Baseline). The change from Week 8 to week 9 in MSSBP was analyzed using an ANCOVA with treatment and region as factors and Week 8 MSSBP level as a covariate.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active Controlled, Parallel Group, Dose Finding Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 Compared to Placebo After 8 Weeks Treatment in Patients With Essential Hypertension
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07704697
Cardiovascular Diseases, Essential Hypertension
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07704684
Cardiovascular Diseases, Essential Hypertension
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07700875
Cardiovascular Diseases, Essential Hypertension
Jinan, Shangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05503953
Cardiovascular Diseases, Essential Hypertension
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details