Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04970082

A Study to Evaluate Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) for Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

This is a randomized, non-inferiority, crossover investigation comparing the Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) versus standard method to measure Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in subjects with FFR indications.

All subjects requiring on a clinical basis a pressure wire assessment of coronary artery stenosis(es) will be eligible to take part in the study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble

Grenoble, 38000, France

About this study

Pressure wire-based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) has become the reference standard index of haemodynamic significance to guide revascularisation of intermediate coronary artery lesions.

The FFR measurement determines the ratio of the maximum blood flow that can be achieved in a diseased or narrowed coronary artery to the maximum blood flow in a normal coronary artery. This ratio represents the potential decrease in distal coronary flow relative to coronary stenosis.

FFR is easily measured during routine coronary angiography using a pressure wire to calculate the ratio of coronary pressure distal to a stenosis or diseased segment to aortic pressure under conditions of maximum myocardial hyperemia. An FFR of 1.0 is widely accepted as normal. An FFR of less than 0.80 is generally considered to be associated with coronary ischemia and widely accepted in favor of revascularization rather than conservative management.

The current standard method of measuring FFR is to insert a pressure wire into the coronary artery while the hyperaemic agent, usually adenosine, is delivered by intracoronary bolus or continuous intravenous injection.

Administration of adenosine may cause bradycardia and thus cause patient vagal discomfort. Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) can potentially overcome the drawbacks of the standard method when measuring FFR. Indeed, DWP allows to transmit an electrical current from the external pacemaker to the heart thanks to metallic FFR guidewire already used, and thus prevent bradycardia.

In addition, there are some absolute contraindications to the use of Adenosine such as 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block, untreated sinus dysfunction or long QT syndrome ...DWP could allow this highly recommended diagnostic tool (1A) to be used in this patient population.

The investigators would therefore like to determine if the measurement of FFR by DWP would be non-inferior to the standard method to obtain precise FFR values and maximize patient's comfort.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Eligible patient for coronary angiography.

Inclusion criteria

The patients included in the study must meet the following inclusion criteria :

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients with FFR indications
  • Has given consent to undergo diagnostic coronary procedure
  • Patients able to understand and provide informed consent
  • Patients with Social Security coverage

Prior to randomisation: Angiography demonstrates at least one coronary stenosis in an artery, requiring FFR measurement for physiological assessment.

Exclusion criteria

The patients included in the study should not meet the following inclusion criteria :

  • Contraindications to use sensitivity to Adenosine or any of its excipients
  • Technically inaccessible stenosis(es)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patients under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship
  • Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial

Treatment and study plan

FFR DWP

Diagnostic Test

FFR will be measured twice in the same lesion : One with the standard method and the other with the DWP method.

FFR

Diagnostic Test

FFR will be measured twice in the same lesion : One with the standard method and the other with the DWP method.

Primary outcomes

  1. Reproducibility of the FFR measurement

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Evaluated by the number of patients with comparable FFR ratio recording. The FFR ratio should remain constant (+/-0.02) between the two modes of measuring FFR.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with Adverse Events

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Assessed by the number of participants with adverse events during the procedure.

  2. Tolerance

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Assessed by asking patients during each FFR to grade verbally any symptoms of chest discomfort.

  3. correlation between a disproportionately high FFR value and la presence of a (partially) infarcted territory

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    The correlation between a disproportionately high FFR value in presence of a (partially)infarcted territory will be assessed by the comparison the obtained FFR value, the degree of angiographic stenosis measured and the obtained stimulation threshold.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Recherche Cardio Vasculaire Alpes

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Crossover Study to Evaluate and Compare the Reproducibility and Tolerability of Direct Wire Pacing for Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Standard Method in Subjects With FFR Indications

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 21, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 15, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.