Daratumumab
DrugDARATUMUMAB
Other names: DARA
NCT Number: NCT03000452
This is a single-arm, multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination regimen of daratumumab plus durvalumab (D2). The study will consist of 2 parts; Part 1 has a 2-stage design while Part 2 consists of an expansion phase. Subjects will receive intravenous (IV) DARA at 16 mg/kg on the same dosing schedule (weekly [QW], every 2 weeks [Q2W] or every 4 weeks [Q4W] of each 28-day cycle) received on their last prior therapy containing DARA. The dosing schedule for DARA may be adjusted during the course of the study as outlined in the protocol. Subjects will also receive IV DURVA at 1500 mg on Day 2 (Cycle 1) and on Day 1 (Cycles ≥ 2) of each 28-day treatment cycle.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Universitaetsklinik Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Indication:
This study will include subjects that have relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after treatment with at least 3 prior antimyeloma therapies, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD®) or after development of double-refractoriness to a both a PI and an IMiD.
The most recent multiple myeloma (MM) treatment regimen should contain daratumumab (DARA) and subjects must have progressed on DARA while on this regimen. Stage 1 A cohort of 18 subjects will be enrolled to determine the preliminary efficacy of DARA plus DURVA. Once the 18 subjects have been enrolled, an interim analysis for futility purpose will be conducted to determine if the study can proceed to Stage 2.
Early Safety Monitoring Once 6 subjects have been enrolled and completed the first treatment cycle in Stage 1 of this study, the enrollment continuity would depend on the availability of safety data from the on-going Phase 2 study (MEDI4736-MM-003) of DARA and DURVA in previously DARA-naïve patients.
Dose-limiting Toxicity
Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) may be evaluated during the DLT evaluation period for the initial 6 patients in Part 1 of the study. The DLT evaluation period will be defined as the first treatment cycle. Subjects are considered evaluable for assessment of DLT if they:
Grading of DLTs will be according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03.
A DLT will be defined as below:
Hematologic DLT
a. Any nonhematological toxicity ≥ Grade 3 except for alopecia and nausea controlled by medical management b. Any treatment interruption greater than 2 weeks due to an AE. While the rules for adjudicating DLTs in the context of dose escalation are specified above, an AE not listed above may be defined as a DLT after consultation with the Sponsor and investigators, based on the emerging safety profile.
Stage 2 If 3 or more subjects achieved a response (PR or better) out of the 18 subjects at the end of Stage 1, an additional 32 subjects will be enrolled to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DARA plus DURVA.
Part 2: Expansion Upon completion of Part 1, if at least 9 subjects achieve a response (PR or better) out of a total of 50 subjects and it is determined to further confirm the efficacy and safety of DARA plus DURVA, an additional 70 subjects may be enrolled.
An Independent Response Adjudication Committee (IRAC) will be set up for this trial to review study data. The IRAC will determine tumor response to therapy and to confirm the time of disease progression (PD) (if disease progressed) at scheduled or unscheduled visits for each subject.
The safety and efficacy of the study will be monitored by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) who are not involved in the trial conduct. The DMC will meet up and review study data at pre specified intervals throughout the trial.
In the event that the trial is halted for early safety monitoring, evaluation of the emerging safety data from the initial 6 patients enrolled in Part 1 will be performed by the Dose Review Team (DRT).
Safety data will be monitored by the Celgene Medical Monitor and Safety Physician on an ongoing basis throughout the study. Should a significant safety issue be identified, the DMC will be convened to make a recommendation as to the future conduct of the study.
The decision to discontinue a subject, which will not be delayed or refused by the Sponsor, remains the responsibility of the treating physician. However, prior to discontinuing a subject, the Investigator may contact the Medical Monitor and forward appropriate supporting documents for review and discussion.
The study will be conducted in compliance with the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
a. Have 2 negative pregnancy tests as verified by the investigator prior to starting study treatment. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence from heterosexual contact.
i. Negative serum pregnancy test at screening ii. Negative serum or urine pregnancy test (investigator's discretion) within 72 hours prior to starting study treatment (Cycle 1, Day 1), and before beginning each subsequent cycle of treatment, and after end of study treatment.
b. Either practice true abstinence from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and source documented) or agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective contraception without interruption (eg, oral, inject able, or implantable hormonal contraceptive; tubal ligation; intra-uterine device; barrier contraceptive with spermicide; true abstinence; or vasectomized partner), 28 days prior to starting study treatment, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for at least 90 days after discontinuation of study treatment.
c. Agree to abstain from breastfeeding during study participation and for at least 90 days after the last dose of Daratumumab (DARA) or Durvalumab (DURVA), whichever is later.
d. Refrain from egg cell donation for at least 90 days after the final dose of DURVA or DARA, whichever is later.
Exclusion criteria
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:
DARATUMUMAB
Other names: DARA
DURVALUMAB
Other names: MEDI4736; DURVA
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 April 2018. The median duration of treatment for durvalumab and daratumumab was 7.9 weeks and 8.0 weeks respectively.
Objective response is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the investigator assessment: sCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 April 2018. The median duration of treatment for durvalumab and daratumumab was 7.9 weeks and 8.0 weeks respectively.
Time-to-response was defined as the time from treatment initiation to the first documentation of response (PR or greater) based on IMWG criteria. sCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg/24 hours. A ≥50% decrease in the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels in place of the M-protein criteria or a ≥50% reduction in plasma cells in place of M-protein if baseline was ≥30%. If present at baseline a ≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 April 2018. The median duration of treatment for durvalumab and daratumumab was 7.9 weeks and 8.0 weeks respectively.
Duration of response was defined as time from the first documentation of response (PR or greater) to the first documentation of PD or death, whichever is earlier, based on the investigator assessments according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria.
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 April 2018. The median duration of treatment for durvalumab and daratumumab was 7.9 weeks and 8.0 weeks respectively.
Progression free survival was defined as the time from treatment initiation to the first documentation of PD or death from any cause during study, whichever occurred earlier. Time to event analysis for PFS and was not analyzed due to insufficient follow up time because of early termination of the trial.
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 17 April 2018. The median duration of treatment for durvalumab and daratumumab was 7.9 weeks and 8.0 weeks respectively.
Overall Survival was defined as the time from treatment initiation to death due to any cause. Time to event analysis for overall survival was not analyzed due to insufficient follow up time because of early termination of the trial.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration, calculated by linear trapezoidal method when concentrations are increasing and the logarithmic trapezoidal method when concentrations are decreasing.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity, calculated as [AUCt + Ct/ λz]. Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. No AUC extrapolation was performed with unreliable λz. If AUC %Extrap was ≥25%, AUC inf was not reported.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Maximum observed plasma concentration, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Time to Cmax, obtained directly from the observed concentration versus time data.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Terminal phase half-life in plasma, calculated as [(ln 2)/λz]. t1/2 was only calculated when a reliable estimate for λz could be obtained.
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Apparent total clearance, calculated as [Dose/AUCinf].
Time frame: Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn on Cycle 1 on Day 2 (C1D2) pre-dose, at the end of the infusion, on Day 8 at 144 hour post dose, on Day 15 at 312 hours post dose and on Day 22 at 480 hours post C1D2 infusion.
Apparent volume of distribution, calculated as [(CL/F)/λz].
Time frame: From the date of the first dose of study drug until 90 days after the last dose of durvalumab or daratumumab , whichever is later. Maximum overall time on treatment was 16 weeks for daratumumab and durvalumab
TEAEs include AEs between the earliest of the first dose date of either study drug and 90 days after the last dose of either study drug. In addition, an AE that occurred beyond the timeframe and was assessed by the doctor as possibly related to IP was considered to be treatment-emergent. Severity was assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03, where 1= Mild; 2= Moderate; 3= Severe; 4= Life-threatening; 5= Death related to AE. Serious AEs resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in a medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes above.
Celgene
Industry
MEDI4736-MM-005 (FUSION MM-005): A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Study to Determine the Efficacy for the Combination of Durvalumab (DURVA) Plus Daratumumab (DARA) (D2) in Subjects With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) That Have Progressed While on Current Treatment Regimen Containing Daratumumab.
Acronym: FUSION-MM-005
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03651128
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02332850
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05064358
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01615029
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details