Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01185288

A Study to Determine the Effect of Methotrexate (MTX) Dose on Clinical Outcome and Ultrasonographic Signs in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Treated With Adalimumab (MUSICA)

This study will investigate the efficacy of both low and high doses of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with open-label adalimumab (ADA) in patients who have had an inadequate response to high dose of MTX. The study will also evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of the two regimens of MTX in combination with ADA in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38691, San Juan, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult subjects with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis
  • Subjects must have a DAS28(CRP) (Disease Activity Score using C-Reactive Protein) greater than or equal to 3.2 at baseline (there is no minimum CRP score required to qualify)
  • Subjects must have at least 5/68 tender joints plus 5/66 swollen joints assessed at screening or baseline
  • Subject must treated with and MTX (methotrexate) dose (oral and/or injectable) of 15 mg or more per week (no upper limit on dose) for at least 12 weeks prior to screening
  • Subject is either biologic-naïve or has only one prior biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (i.e. abatacept, anakinra, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, or tocilizumab)

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous exposure to adalimumab (Humira), rituximab (Rituxan), natalizumab (Tysabri), efalizumab (Raptiva)
  • Subject has been treated with intra-articular or parenteral administration of corticosteroids within 4 weeks of screening
  • Subject has diagnosis or history of gout or pseudogout
  • Subject has undergone joint surgery within 12 weeks of screening (at joints to be assessed by ultrasound)
  • Subject has history of chronic arthritis diagnosed before age 16 years

Treatment and study plan

Adalimumab

Biological

Adalimumab in pre-filled syringes

Other names: ABT-D2E7, Humira

methotrexate

Drug

Methotrexate capsule

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-reactive Protein (DAS28[CRP]) at Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    The DAS28(CRP) score includes 28 tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and participant's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to 10. A DAS28(CRP) score ≥ 5.1 indicates high disease activity, and a DAS28(CRP) score < 2.6 indicates clinical remission. Least squares means and 95% CI were from 2-way ANCOVA model with effects for baseline DAS28(CRP) value, treatment group, and prior methotrexate dose group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Power Doppler Ultrasound (PD U/S) Score for Synovial Vascularity Improvement by 30% at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

    PD U/S assessed the severity of synovial inflammation in both hands (bilateral wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints 2, 3, 5, and metatarsophalangeal joint 5). Bilateral images based on dorsal midline imaging of the wrist, dorsal and volar imaging of metacarpophalangeal joints, and dorsal imaging alone of metatarsophalangeal joints are scored using a 4-grade scale: grade 0 or normal = normal joint (no Doppler signal); grade 1 or mild = mild synovitis (≤ 3 isolated signals); grade 2 or moderate = moderate synovitis (> 3 isolated signals or a confluent signal in < 50% of synovial area); grade 3 or marked = marked synovitis (signals in ≥ 50% of the synovial area). Each image is rated 0 to 3, for a total possible score ranging from 0 to 48 (16*0, 16*3) for 2 hands. Higher grade/score=more severe disease. Change = week 24 score - baseline score.

  2. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Criteria Response at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

    Response, as defined by ACR50 criteria at week 24. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline are met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: physician global assessment of disease activity, participant global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of pain, disability index of the health assessment questionnaire, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).

  3. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Criteria Response at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

    Response, as defined by ACR70 criteria at week 24. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline are met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: physician global assessment of disease activity, participant global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of pain, disability index of the health assessment questionnaire, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ -0.22 at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

    The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0), with some difficulty (1), with much difficulty (2), and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe, high dependency disability). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defined for the HAQ-DI is a change from baseline of ≤ -0.22. Normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of < 0.5. Negative change from baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Version II (MOS) Sleep Problem Index 9 at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks

    The least squares mean percentage change in MOS Sleep Problem Index 9 from baseline to week 24. The MOS Sleep Problem Index 9 consists of 9 questions to assess sleep, including how long it takes the participant to fall asleep (1=0 to 15 minutes, to 5=more than 60 minutes); and aspects of related to quality of sleep, including how often the participant felt that the sleep was not quiet, felt rested upon waking, awakened short of breath or with a headache, felt drowsy during the day, had trouble falling sleep, how often were awaken, had trouble staying awake during the day, and got needed amount of sleep (1=all the time; 5=none of the time). Least squares means and 95% CI were from 2-way ANCOVA model with effects for baseline MOS Sleep Problem Index value, treatment group, and prior methotrexate dose group.

Other outcomes

  1. Serum Adalimumab Trough Concentrations at Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    Serum trough concentrations of adalimumab assessed at week 24 (24 weeks after the 1st dose).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Arm Study to Determine the Effect of Methotrexate Dose on Clinical Outcome and Ultrasonographic Signs in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Adalimumab (MUSICA)

Acronym: MUSICA

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Aug 19, 2010
Registry last updated
Mar 18, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.