SEL-212
DrugAdministered as specified in the treatment arm
NCT Number: NCT03905512
This is a randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter study to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of SEL-212 and KRYSTEXXA®. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive treatment with SEL-212 or KRYSTEXXA® for 6 months. Efficacy assessments, as measured by serum uric acid (SUA) levels, will be conducted at intervals that are appropriate to determine treatment effect differences. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Pinnacle Research Group, LLC, Anniston, Alabama, United States
This is a randomized, parallel-arm, multicenter study to compare the safety and efficacy profiles of SEL-212 and KRYSTEXXA®. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive treatment with SEL-212 [a combination of pegadricase (SEL-037) and ImmTOR (SEL-110)] or KRYSTEXXA® for 6 months.
Study participants in the SEL-212 arm will receive study drug every 28 days for a total of up to 6 infusions of SEL-212. Study participants in the KRYSTEXXA® arm will receive study drug according to the manufacturer's prescribing information, i.e., every 14 days for a total of up to 12 infusions of KRYSTEXXA®.
Efficacy assessments, as measured by SUA levels, will be conducted at intervals that are appropriate to determine treatment effect differences. Safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Other names: Pegloticase
Time frame: Up to Month 6
The average of the data collected during Month 3 and Month 6 was reported.
Time frame: Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6
Eight categories were assessed by the HAQ-DI: 1) dressing and grooming, 2) arising, 3) eating, 4) walking, 5) hygiene, 6) reaching, 7) gripping, and 8) common daily activities. There were 2 or 3 questions for each category.
Scoring within each category was on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The score given to each section was the worst (highest) score within the section. The HAQ-DI total score was calculated if 6 or more sections were available. The average of the 8 category scores was reported as the HAQ-DI total score on a scale of 0 to 3. Reduction from baseline, and lower scores indicated better QoL.
Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6
The PrGA was administered to assess the severity of the participant's disease on a scale from 0 (participant feels "very well") to 100 (participant feels "very poor"). Reduction from baseline, and lower scores indicated less severe disease.
Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 3, Baseline to End of Month 6
The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire to assesses a participant's health status using 8 health concepts: limitations in physical activities because of health problems; limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; bodily pain; general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; vitality (energy and fatigue); and general health perceptions.
The mental component reports the average of all the emotionally relevant items and the physical component reports the average of all the physical relevant items. Each component is directly transformed into a 0 to 100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. A score of 0 is equal to maximum disability, and a score of 100 indicates no disability. Median change can range from -100 to 100. A positive median change indicated an improved outcome.
Time frame: Month 1 to Month 3, Month 4 to Month 6
Time frame: Month 1 to Month 3, Month 4 to Month 6
Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 6
Time frame: Baseline to End of Month 6
Selecta Biosciences, Inc.
Industry
A Study to Compare the Efficacy of SEL-212 to KRYSTEXXA® in Gout Patients Refractory to Conventional Therapy
Acronym: COMPARE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04762498
Arthritis, Chronic Gout
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04596540
Chronic Gout
Clearwater, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04513366
Chronic Gout
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02956278
Chronic Gout, Hyperuricemia
Mountain View, California, United States
View Trial Details