Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03682536

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Participants Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions and Are ESA Naïve

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of luspatercept (ACE-536) compared to epoetin alfa on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (for at least 12 weeks) with a concurrent hemoglobin increase of at least 1.5 g/dL in participants with anemia due to revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who require RBC transfusions and have never been exposed to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA).

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Local Institution - 206, Albury, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Documented diagnosis of Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) according to WHO 2016 classification that meets revised international prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and have < 5% blasts in bone marrow
  • Endogenous serum erythropoietin (sEPO) level of < 500 U/L
  • Requires Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, as documented by the criteria: Average transfusion requirement of 2 - 6 units/8 weeks of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) confirmed for a minimum of 8 weeks immediately preceding randomization
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion criteria

  • Clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or hypothyroidism, or any type of known clinically significant bleeding or sequestration or drug induced anemia
  • Known history of diagnosis of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as repeated elevations of systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥ 150 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg despite adequate treatment

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Treatment and study plan

Luspatercept

Drug

Specified dose on specified days

Other names: ACE-536

Epoetin alfa

Drug

Specified dose on specified days

Other names: EPREX®, ERYPO®, PROCRIT®

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 12 Weeks (84 Days) With a Mean Hemoglobin Increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free for any 12-week period associated with a concurrent mean hemoglobin (Hgb) increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL compared to baseline.

    After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated.

    4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being < 14 days after the previous transfusion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for 24 Weeks

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI) for 24 weeks is defined as the percentage of participants who did not receive RBC transfusions from Week 1 through Week 24.

  2. Mean Hemoglobin Change Over 24 Weeks

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Mean hemoglobin (Hgb) change over the 24-week period of Week 1 through Week 24 compared to baseline.

    After applying below 14/3-day rule, the baseline Hgb value is defined as the lowest Hgb value from the central, local laboratory, or pre transfusion Hgb from transfusion records that is within 56 days on or prior to the first dose of treatment, or randomization date if participants were not treated.

    4/3-day rule: only Hgb values that are at least 14 days after a transfusion may be used unless there is another transfusion within 3 days after the Hgb assessment. If this occurs, that Hgb value will be used despite being < 14 days after the previous transfusion.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E) Per IWG

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    The percentage of participants meeting the modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of >= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of < 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.

  4. Time to Hematologic Improvement - Erythroid Response (HI-E)

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Time from first dose to first onset of achieving modified HI-E.

    The modified HI-E criteria per the International Working Group (IWG) sustained over any consecutive 56-day period in Week 1-24: For participants with baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden of >= 4 units/8 weeks, a reduction of at least 4 units RBC transfusion; for participants with baseline RBC transfusion burden of < 4 units/8 weeks, mean increase of hemoglobin of at least 1.5 g/dL in the absence of transfusions.

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Percentage of participants who are RBC transfusion-free over a consecutive 84-day period.

  6. Duration of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

    Time frame: Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)

    Maximum duration of RBC transfusion independence for participants who achieve RBC-TI ≥ 84 days.

  7. Time to Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 12 Weeks (84 Days)

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Time from first dose to first onset of transfusion independence ≥ 84 days.

  8. Time to First Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion

    Time frame: Week 1 through End of Treatment (Up to approximately an average of 66 weeks and a maximum of 202 weeks)

    Time to first RBC transfusion is defined as time from Week 1 to first RBC transfusion on treatment. Participants who maintain RBC-TI through the end of the Treatment Period or time of analysis will be censored at EOT visit date, subsequent MDS therapy start date, study discontinuation date, analysis cutoff date or death, whichever occurs first. Median is from un-stratified Kaplan-Meier method.

  9. The Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused Within the First 24 Weeks of Treatment

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    RBC transfusion burden on treatment is defined as total number of packed red blood cell (pRBC) units transfused within the first 24 weeks of treatment since Week 1.

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for ≥ 56 Days (8 Weeks)

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 24

    Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for >= 56 days during any consecutive 56-day period from Week 1 through Week 24.

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) for a Consecutive 24-week Period

    Time frame: Week 1 through Week 48

    Defined as percentage of participants achieving RBC-TI for >= 168 days during any consecutive 168-day period from Week 1 through Week 48.

  12. The Number of Participants With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

    Time frame: From randomization to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)

    Progression to AML is defined as a diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow.

  13. Median Time to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Progression

    Time frame: From randomization to first diagnosis of AML up to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)

    Time to AML progression is defined as the time between randomization and first diagnosis of AML as per WHO classification of ≥ 20% blasts in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Participants with diagnosis of AML will be considered to have had an event. Participants who have not progressed to AML at the time of analysis will be censored at the last assessment date which does not indicate progression to AML estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

  14. Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Randomization to death due to any cause up to 5 years from first dose or 3 years from last dose (whichever occurs later), unless the participant withdraws consent from the study, dies or is lost to follow-up. (Up to approximately 221 weeks)

    Time from date of randomization to death due to any cause

  15. The Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: From first dose to 42 days post last dose (Up to approximately an average of 72 weeks and a maximum of 208 weeks)

    Treatment-emergent adverse events include adverse events that started on or after the first dose of treatment until 42 days after the last dose of treatment, as well as those serious adverse events (SAEs) made known to the investigator at any time thereafter that are suspected of being related to treatment.

    The severity/intensity of AEs were graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0). Grade 3 = Severe, Grade 4 = Life-threatening, and Grade 5 = Death.

  16. Number of Participants With a Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Test

    Time frame: Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose

    Number of participants under each ADA positive category. A participant is counted as 'Treatment-Emergent' if there is a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample is ADA negative, or there is a positive post-baseline sample with a titer >= 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample is ADA positive. A participant is counted as 'Preexisting' if the baseline sample is ADA positive and the participant is not qualified for 'Treatment-Emergent'. If the participant was discontinued from study treatment earlier than one year from the first dose, additional samples will be collected if last ADA is positive.

    Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.

  17. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Time frame: Baseline and week 24.

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is composed of 30 items that includes a global health status score ranging from: 1-7 as well as scores for 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain) and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) all ranging from 1-4. Subscale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A high score for a functional scale represents a high or healthy level of functioning; a high score for the global health status/health related quality of life (HRQoL) represents a high overall HRQoL; but a high score for a symptom scale represents a high level of symptomatology or problems. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.

  18. Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Version 4 (FACT-An)

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 on weeks 7,13,19, and 24.

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire includes 47 items rating on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) (so that 0 is considered worse quality of life and 4 is good response) on five primary subscales:

    • Physical well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28)
    • Social/Family well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28)
    • Emotional well-being (sum of 6 items, score range from 0-24)
    • Functional well-being (sum of 7 items, score range from 0-28)
    • Anemia-related symptoms (sum of 20 items, score range from 0-80)

    A total score for the FACT-An can be calculated by summing the five primary subscales with a score range from 0-188. Higher scores representing better quality of life. Baseline is defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug.

  19. Area Under the Concentration-time Curve [AUC]

    Time frame: Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose

  20. Maximum Plasma Concentration of Drug [Cmax]

    Time frame: Day 1 on week 4, 10, 16, 22, and every 12 weeks (±14 days) from the 24-Week MDS Assessment visit for up to one year from the first dose

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Celgene

Industry

Collaborators

  • Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3, Open-label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Epoetin Alpha for the Treatment of Anemia Due to IPSS-R Very Low, Low or Intermediate Risk Due to Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) in ESA Naïve Subjects Who Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions

Acronym: COMMANDS

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 24, 2018
Registry last updated
Nov 20, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.