Binimetinib
DrugGiven PO
Other names: ARRY-162, ARRY-438162, MEK162, Mektovi
NCT Number: NCT04511013
This phase II trial compares the effect of encorafenib, binimetinib, and nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab in treating patients with BRAF- V600 mutant melanoma that has spread to the brain (brain metastases). Encorafenib and binimetinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Ipilimumab and nivolumab are monoclonal antibodies that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. This trial aims to find out which approach is more effective in shrinking and controlling brain metastases from melanoma.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 between participants randomized to the triplet combination of encorafenib + binimetinib + nivolumab versus the doublet combination of ipilimumab + nivolumab among participants with BRAF-V600 mutant melanoma that has metastasized to the brain.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the overall survival (OS) of participants in each treatment arm. II. To estimate the objective response rate (ORR) (confirmed and unconfirmed, complete and partial responses) per RECIST 1.1 in each treatment arm.
III. To estimate the intracranial response rate (ICRR), defined as confirmed and unconfirmed complete and partial response per modified RECIST for brain metastases (mRECIST).
IV. To evaluate the duration of response, per RECIST 1.1 and the duration of ICRR per mRECIST, and per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)-Brain Metastases (BM) (and immunotherapy [i]RANO) in each treatment arm.
V. To evaluate the toxicity profile of each treatment arm. VI. To evaluate current and emerging radiographic response criteria (modified RECIST 1.1, modified RANO-BM and iRANO) by a retrospective blinded independent centralized review (BICR) of banked images.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
I. To bank tumor tissue, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), stool and blood samples for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM I: Patients receive encorafenib orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-28, binimetinib PO twice daily (BID) on days 1-28, and nivolumab intravenously (IV) on day 1. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive nivolumab IV on day 1 of all cycles and ipilimumab IV over 30 minutes on day 1 of cycles 1-4. Cycles repeat every 21 days for 4 cycles and then every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 6 months for 2 years, and then annually until 3 years after randomization.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: ARRY-162, ARRY-438162, MEK162, Mektovi
Given PO
Other names: Braftovi, LGX 818, LGX-818, LGX818
Given IV
Other names: Anti-Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated Antigen-4 Monoclonal Antibody, BMS-734016, MDX-010, MDX-CTLA4, Yervoy
Given IV
Other names: BMS-936558, MDX-1106, NIVO, ONO-4538, Opdivo
Time frame: From date of registration to date of first documentation of progression, or symptomatic deterioration, or death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years after randomization
Will be assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
Time frame: From date of registration to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 3 years after randomization
Will be assessed by Immunotherapy Response Assessment Criteria for Intracranial Metastases (RANO-BM). Will construct Kaplan-Meier plots and estimate the median OS and construct 95% Brookmeyer-Crowley Confidence intervals.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
The ICRR is defined as the best response when applying modified (m)RECIST criteria. Will compare intracranial response based on assessments per mRECIST, RANO-BM and immunotherapy (i)RANO criteria based on a review of the banked images. For each of these methods, the best response to treatment will be summarized by treatment arm, the percent agreement between each pair of methods will be reported along with a 95% confidence interval, and a p-value based on a two-sided McNemar's test will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Will be assessed by RECIST 1.1.
Time frame: Up to 3 years after randomization
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
SWOG Cancer Research Network
Network
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Nivolumab vs Ipilimumab + Nivolumab in BRAF-V600 Mutant Melanoma With Brain Metastases
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03025256
Acral Lentiginous Melanoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03698019
Acral Lentiginous Melanoma, Clinical Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma AJCC v8
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00937937
Acral Lentiginous Melanoma, Cutaneous Nodular Melanoma
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02875132
Acral Lentiginous Melanoma
Hong Kong
View Trial Details