Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06687369

A Study to Compare Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of MB12 (Proposed Pembrolizumab Biosimilar) to Keytruda® in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (BENITO Study)

This is a randomized, multicenter, multinational, double-blind, integrated pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy similarity study to compare the PK, efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of MB12 versus Keytruda® in combination with pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Site 101001, Yerevan, Armenia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult male/female patients ≥18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
  • Histologic or cytologic diagnosis of advanced NSCLC, stage IV (defined by the 8th edition of the Tumor Node Metastasis [TNM] classification), with no EGFR sensitizing (activating) mutation or ALK translocation, and who have not received prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC. In those patients in whom the pleural or pericardial effusion is the only location of metastatic disease, confirmation of its malignant etiology is required.
  • At least 1 radiographically measurable lesion according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
  • Known status of PD-L1 expression.
  • Performance based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1.
  • Adequate hepatic, renal, hematologic, endocrine, and coagulation function.

Exclusion criteria

  • Predominantly squamous cell histology NSCLC. Mixed tumors will be categorized by the predominant cell type; if small cell elements are present, the patient is not eligible.
  • Known history of central nervous system metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis.
  • Prior anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-PD-L2, anti-CD137, or anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein (CTLA)-4 therapy (including ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug that specifically targets co-stimulation of T-cells or immune checkpoints).
  • Major surgery within 3 weeks of the first dose of study treatment.
  • Active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in the last 2 years.
  • Contraindication and/or intolerance to the administration of pembrolizumab or known sensitivity to any component of pembrolizumab.
  • Has a known sensitivity to any component of cisplatin, carboplatin, or pemetrexed.

Treatment and study plan

MB12 (Proposed Pembrolizumab Biosimilar)

Drug

200mg IV, every 3 weeks on Day 1

EU-sourced Keytruda®

Drug

200mg IV, every 3 weeks on Day 1

US-sourced Keytruda®

Drug

200mg IV, every 3 weeks on Day 1

Pemetrexed

Drug

500 mg/m2 IV, every 3 weeks on Day 1

carboplatin

Drug

Area under the curve (AUC) 5 IV, every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 cycles.

Cisplatin

Drug

75 mg/m2 IV, every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 cycles

Primary outcomes

  1. To demonstrate the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence of MB12, EU-sourced Keytruda® and US-sourced Keytruda® in combination with chemotherapy

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 24

    Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) between Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 (AUC from time 0 to 504 hours postdose [AUC0-504]. AUC at steady state (AUCss) between Cycle 7 and Cycle 8.

  2. To demonstrate the efficacy equivalence of MB12 and Keytruda® in combination with chemotherapy administered as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (any PD-L1 expression type).

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 24

    Objective response rate (ORR), up to and including 24 weeks (end of Cycle 8)

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the efficacy of MB12 as compared with Keytruda® based on other efficacy parameters and timepoints over the study period.

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 52

    Objective response rate (ORR), Progression-free survival (PFS), Duration of response (DOR) and Overall survival (OS)

  2. To compare the PK profile based on other PK parameters and timepoints (not covered by the primary PK endpoints) of MB12 as compared with Keytruda® over the study period.

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 52

    Maximum concentration (Cmax), Time to maximum concentration (Tmax), Minimum concentration (Ctrough), Clearance (CL), Elimination half-life (t1/2), Distribution volume (Vd)

  3. To assess the safety and tolerability of MB12 as compared with Keytruda®

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 52

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

  4. To assess the immunogenicity of MB12 as compared with Keytruda®

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 52

    Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) in ADA-positive samples

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Camino Huerga

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34917711500

Susana Millán, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34917711500

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

mAbxience Research S.L.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Multicenter, Multinational, Double-Blind Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of MB12 (Proposed Pembrolizumab Biosimilar) Versus Keytruda® in Combination With Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (BENITO Study)

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Nov 13, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.