Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02260791

A Study to Compare FKB327 Efficacy and Safety With Humira® in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of FKB327 in comparison to Humira® in rheumatoid arthritis patients who have inadequate disease control on methotrexate.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Research Site, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female aged 18 years or over
  • Patients have been diagnosed with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) for at least 3 months
  • Patient has active RA
  • Patient has taken a stable dose of methotrexate for at least 3 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient has been previously treated with adalimumab
  • Patient has been previously treated or has ongoing treatment with prohibited medications
  • Patient has been immunised with a live or attenuated vaccine in past 4 weeks
  • Patient has positive result for HIV, HBV, HCV or TB infection

Other Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

FKB327

Drug

Solution of FKB327 for subcutaneous injection administered in a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks for 22 weeks.

Humira®

Drug

Solution of Humira® for subcutaneous injection administered in a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks for 22 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response Rate

    Time frame: Week 24

    The primary efficacy endpoint was the ACR20 response rate at Week 24.

    An ACR20 response meant that the patient achieved a 20% improvement in Tender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count and in at least 3 of the other 5 Core Data Set elements listed below.

    • Acute phase reactant (CRP)
    • Patient global assessment of disease activity
    • Physician global assessment of disease activity
    • Patient pain scale
    • Disability/functional questionnaire (patient completed Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI])

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Based on C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24

    The DAS28-CRP assessment involved evaluating the number of tender (TJC) and swollen (SJC) joints (out of 28 specified joints), serum CRP, and patient global assessment of disease activity (VAS from 0 to 100, very well to extremely bad). The DAS28-CRP is a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the patient's RA. A higher score indicates higher disease activity.

  2. ACR20 Response Rates Over Time

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24

    An ACR20 response meant that the patient achieved a 20% improvement in Tender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count and in at least 3 of the other 5 Core Data Set elements listed below.

    • Acute phase reactant (CRP)
    • Patient global assessment of disease activity
    • Physician global assessment of disease activity
    • Patient pain scale
    • Disability/functional questionnaire (patient completed Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI])
  3. ACR50 Response Rates Over Time

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24

    An ACR50 response meant that the patient achieved a 50% improvement in Tender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count and in at least 3 of the other 5 Core Data Set elements listed below.

    • Acute phase reactant (CRP)
    • Patient global assessment of disease activity
    • Physician global assessment of disease activity
    • Patient pain scale
    • Disability/functional questionnaire (patient completed Health AssessmentQuestionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI])
  4. ACR70 Response Rates Over Time

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 24

    An ACR70 response meant that the patient achieved a 70% improvement in Tender Joint Count and Swollen Joint Count and in at least 3 of the other 5 Core Data Set elements listed below.

    • Acute phase reactant (CRP)
    • Patient global assessment of disease activity
    • Physician global assessment of disease activity
    • Patient pain scale
    • Disability/functional questionnaire (patient completed Health AssessmentQuestionnaire Disability Index [HAQ-DI])
  5. Swollen Joint Count

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Counts of swollen joints from amongst 66 selected joints performed by a trained and qualified joint assessor using standardised techniques recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66 with higher scores indicating severe disease. Swollen joint count is a value of the individual ACR core set variables.

  6. Tender Joint Count

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Counts of tender joints from amongst 68 selected joints were performed by a trained and qualified joint assessor using standardised techniques recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68 with higher scores indicating severe disease.Tender joint count is a value of the individual ACR core set variables.

  7. Analysis of Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Concentration

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Analysis of serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for inclusion in the ACR20/50/70 and DAS28-CRP scores was performed by a central laboratory. Elevation of CRP is a nonspecific marker of inflammation. Values above 10 mg/L were considered to be abnormally high. Decrease in level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation.

  8. Patient Assessment of Disease Activity

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Patient assessment of disease activity visual analogue scale (VAS) will be assessed on 100-point scales (ranging from very well (0) to extremely bad (100)).The patient assessment of disease activity VAS will contribute to the calculation of the DAS28 score. The patient assessment of disease activity VAS will contribute to the calculation of ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response.

  9. Physician Assessment of Disease Activity

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Physician assessment of disease activity visual analogue scale (VAS) will be assessed on 100-point scale (ranging from very low (0) to very high (100)). The physician assessment of disease activity VAS will contribute to the calculation of ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response.

  10. Patient's Assessment of Pain

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    An injection site pain visual analogue score (VAS) will be administered to the patient. To determine the extent of the pain, patients will be asked to place a small vertical mark on a horizontal scale from 0 to 100, the ends of which are labelled with the extreme responses to be measured ("No pain" at 0 and "Intolerable pain" at 100). Patient's assessment of pain is a value of the individual ACR core set variables.

  11. Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    The HAQ-DI is a 20-question, self-administered instrument that measures the patient's functional ability on a 4-level difficulty scale (0 to 3, with 0 representing normal or no difficulty and 3 representing inability to perform). Eight categories of functioning are included: dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. This scale is sensitive to change and is a good predictor of future disability. HAQ-DI is a value of the individual ACR core set variables.

  12. DAS28-CRP Score Over Time

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    The DAS28 score is a combined index that has been developed to measure the disease activity in patients with RA and has been extensively validated for its use in clinical studies. The DAS28-CRP assessment involved evaluating the number of tender (TJC) and swollen (SJC) joints (out of 28 specified joints), serum CRP, and patient global assessment of disease activity (VAS from 0 to 100, very well to extremely bad). The individual results are summed using a formula. The DAS28 is a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the patient's RA. A higher score indicates higher disease activity.

  13. DAS28 Score Based on Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24

    The DAS28 score is a combined index that has been developed to measure the disease activity in patients with RA and has been extensively validated for its use in clinical studies. The DAS28-ESR assessment involved evaluating the number of tender (TJC) and swollen (SJC) joints (out of 28 specified joints), serum ESR, and patient global assessment of disease activity (VAS from 0 to 100, very well to extremely bad). The individual results are summed using a formula. The DAS28 is a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the patient's RA. A higher score indicates higher disease activity.

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Developing Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

    Time frame: Baseline and last sampling day

    Blood samples for the assessment of ADA activity were collected at Baseline (Week 0), prior to dosing at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 24.

  2. Trough Adalimumab Concentration

    Time frame: Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, Week 20, and Week 24

    Blood samples for the quantification of adalimumab concentration in serum were collected at Baseline (Week 0), prior to dosing at Weeks 2, 4, 12 and 20, and Week 24. Samples were taken prior to dosing (trough samples).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised, Blinded, Active-Controlled Study to Compare FKB327 Efficacy and Safety With the Comparator Humira® in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Inadequately Controlled on Methotrexate

Acronym: ARABESC

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Oct 9, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 28, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.