Lacosamide tablet
Drug- Active Substance: Lacosamide
- Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated Tablet
- Concentration: 50 mg
- Route of Administration: Oral use
Other names: Vimpat
NCT Number: NCT02408523
Evaluating efficacy & safety of lacosamide versus Placebo in a blinded fashion as add-on Therapy for Primary Generalized Tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in subject 4 years of age or greater with idiopathic generalized epilepsy currently taking 1 to 3 antiepileptic drugs. Maximum duration of study drug administration is 28 weeks. Eligible subjects may choose to enter the open-label extension study after completion.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Sp0982 981, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For randomized subjects with a Baseline result >ULN for ALT, AST, ALP, or total bilirubin, a Baseline diagnosis and/or the cause of any clinically meaningful elevation must be understood and recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF).
If subject has >ULN ALT, AST, or ALP that does not meet the exclusion limit at screening, repeat the tests, if possible, prior to dosing to ensure there is no further ongoing clinically relevant increase. In case of a clinically relevant increase, inclusion of the subject must be discussed with the Medical Monitor.
Tests that result in ALT, AST, or ALP up to 25% above the exclusion limit may be repeated once for confirmation. This includes re-screening.
Other names: Vimpat
Other names: Vimpat
Time frame: During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
The primary efficacy variable was the time to the second primary generalized tonic clonic seizure (PGTCS) during the 24-week Treatment Period. Relative difference between groups (Lacosamide vs Placebo) was expressed as Hazard Ratio.
The indicated measured values are the observed number of events of second PGTCS in the treatment period which form the basis of the statistical analysis of the time to event analysis.
The hazard ratio compares 2 treatment groups for the times to a specified number of events (125) for the combined treatment groups, and so both the number of events and the times until those events pertain to the computation of the hazard ratio.
A Hazard Ratio below 1 indicates time to second PGTCS was improved for LCM compared to Placebo.
Time frame: During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
A seizure-free day from primary generalized tonic clonic seizures (PGTCS) was defined as a day where no PGTCS were reported in the seizure diary and PGTCS were assessed, which was estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.
Time frame: During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
The secondary efficacy variable was the time to the first primary generalized tonic clonic seizure (PGTCS) during the 24-week Treatment Period. Relative difference between groups (Lacosamide vs Placebo) was expressed as Hazard Ratio.
The indicated measured values are the observed number of events of first PGTCS in the treatment period which form the basis of the statistical analysis of the time to event analysis.
The hazard ratio compares 2 treatment groups for the times to the number of events for the combined treatment groups, and so both the number of events and the times until those events pertain to the computation of the hazard ratio.
A Hazard Ratio below 1 indicates time to second PGTCS was improved for LCM compared to Placebo.
Time frame: From Visit 1 (Week -4) to End of Study Period (up to Week 36)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation study participant administered a pharmaceutical product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational medicinal product (IMP), whether or not related to the IMP.
Time frame: During the Treatment Period from Visit 2 (Week 0) to Visit 10 (Week 24)
Lacosamide plasma concentration was expressed in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL).
Means and standard deviation (SD) were only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective timepoint. Values Below Limit of Quantification (BLQ) were replaced by value of 0 in calculations of means and SDs.
UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
Industry
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy for Uncontrolled Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Subjects With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy
Acronym: VALOR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05147571
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02408549
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03406702
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02722590
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Chungju, Chungcheong-do, South Korea
View Trial Details