Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06589986

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Afimkibart (Also Known as RO7790121) for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

This Phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treat-through study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Afimkibart (RO7790121) compared with placebo in participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC).

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

CIPREC Centro de Investigacion y Prevencion Cardiovascular, Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of UC
  • Moderately to severely active UC assessed by mMS
  • Bodyweight >= 40 kilogram (kg)
  • Up to date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening performed according to local standards
  • Demonstrated inadequate response, loss of response and/or intolerance to at least one protocol-specified conventional or advanced UC therapy
  • Males and females of childbearing potential must meet protocol criteria for contraception requirements

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently known complications of UC (e.g. fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon)
  • Current diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, infectious colitis, radiation colitis
  • Presence of an ostomy or ileoanal pouch
  • Current diagnosis or suspicion of primary sclerosing cholangitis
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention of becoming pregnant during the study
  • Past or current evidence of definite low-grade or high-grade colonic dysplasia or adenomas or neoplasia not completely removed
  • History of malignancy within 5 years, with the exception of malignancies adequately treated with resection for non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell cancer or in situ cervical cancer
  • Evidence of infection with Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile; formerly known as Clostridium difficile), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV)
  • Has evidence of active tuberculosis (TB), latent TB not successfully treated (per local guidance) or inadequately treated TB
  • Has received protocol-specified prohibited medicines, including known exposure to any type of anti-TL1A therapy

Treatment and study plan

Afimkibart

Drug

Afimkibart will be administered as IV infusion. Afimkibart will be administered as SC injection.

Other names: PF-06480605, RVT-3101, RG6631, RO7790121

Placebo

Drug

Placebo matching IV afimkibart. Placebo matching SC afimkibart.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving Modified Mayo Score (mMS) <=2 with stool frequency subscore (SFS) = 0 or 1 (up to 1-2 stools more than normal), rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) = 0 (no blood seen) and endoscopic subscore (ES) = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 12. mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. Each subscore is measured on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values associated with greater severity.

  2. Percentage of Participants with Clinical Remission at Week 52

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving mMS <= 2 with SFS = 0 or 1 (up to 1-2 stools more than normal), RBS = 0 (no blood seen) and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 52. mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. Each subscore is measured on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values associated with greater severity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Partial Modified Mayo Score (pmMS)

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2

    Change in pmMS from baseline to Week 2. pmMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis signs and symptoms activity given by the sum of the SFS and RBS. SFS is measured on a scale from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). RBS is measured on a scale from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed).

  2. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Improvement

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 12.

  3. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Remission

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic subscore of 0 (normal appearance of mucosa) at Week 12.

  4. Percentage of Participants with Clinical Response

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving a decrease in mMS of at least 2 points and 30% from baseline and either a decrease in RBS >= 1 or RBS = 0 or 1 (no blood seen or stool with streaks of blood) at Week 12. mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. SFS is measured on a scale from 0 (normal number of stools) to 3 (5 or more stools than normal). RBS is measured on a scale from 0 (no blood seen) to 3 (blood alone passed). ES is measured on a scale from 0 (normal appearance of mucosa) to 3 (severe disease).

  5. Percentage of Participants with Histologic Improvement

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving a histologic improvement, defined as Geboes <=3.1 at Week 12. Geboes is a grading system for histologic ulcerative colitis disease activity with scores ranging from 0 (no activity) to 5.4 (ulcer or granulation tissue).

  6. Percentage of Participants with Histologic Remission

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving a histologic remission, defined as Geboes <2B at Week 12. Geboes is a grading system for histologic ulcerative colitis disease activity with scores ranging from 0 (no activity) to 5.4 (ulcer or granulation tissue).

  7. Percentage of Participants with Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving Geboes <= 3.1 and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 12. Geboes is a grading system for histologic ulcerative colitis disease activity with scores ranging from 0 (no activity) to 5.4 (ulcer or granulation tissue).

  8. Percentage of Participants with Histologic-Endoscopic Remission

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving Geboes < 2 and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 12. Geboes is a grading system for histologic ulcerative colitis disease activity with scores ranging from 0 (no activity) to 5.4 (ulcer or granulation tissue).

  9. Percentage of Participants with Maintenance of Remission

    Time frame: Week 12 and Week 52

    Percentage of participants with clinical remission at both Week 12 and Week 52. Clinical remission is defined as mMS <= 2 with SFS = 0 or 1 (up to 1-2 stools more than normal), RBS = 0 (no blood seen) and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease). mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. Each subscore is measured on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values associated with greater severity.

  10. Percentage of Participants with Corticosteroid-Free Remission

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants in clinical remission at Week 52 with no corticosteroid use at least 8 weeks prior to Week 52. Clinical remission is defined as mMS <= 2 with SFS = 0 or 1 (up to 1-2 stools more than normal), RBS = 0 (no blood seen) and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease). mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. Each subscore is measured on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values associated with greater severity.

  11. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Improvement

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 52.

  12. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Remission

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic subscore of 0 (normal appearance of mucosa) at Week 52.

  13. Percentage of Participants with Histologic Improvement

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving histologic improvement defined as Geboes <= 3.1 at Week 52.

  14. Percentage of Participants with Histologic Remission

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving histologic remission defined as Geboes <2B at Week 52.

  15. Percentage of Participants with Histologic-Endoscopic Mucosal Improvement

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving Geboes <= 3.1 and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 52. Geboes is a grading system for histologic ulcerative colitis disease activity with scores ranging from 0 (no activity) to 5.4 (ulcer or granulation tissue).

  16. Percentage of Participants with Histologic-Endoscopic Remission

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving Geboes < 2 and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 52. Geboes is a grading system for histologic ulcerative colitis disease activity with scores ranging from 0 (no activity) to 5.4 (ulcer or granulation tissue).

  17. Percentage of Participants with Clinical remission: Among Biomarker-Defined Subgroups of Participants

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving mMS <= 2 with SFS = 0 or 1 (up to 1-2 stools more than normal), RBS = 0 (no blood seen) and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 12 in biomarker-defined subgroups. mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. Each subscore is measured on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values associated with greater severity.

  18. Percentage of Participants with Clinical remission: Among Biomarker-Defined Subgroups of Participants

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving mMS <= 2 with SFS = 0 or 1 (up to 1-2 stools more than normal), RBS = 0 (no blood seen) and ES = 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 52 in biomarker-defined subgroups. mMS is a composite score of ulcerative colitis disease activity, given by the sum of three subscores: SFS, RBS and ES. Each subscore is measured on a scale from 0 to 3, with higher values associated with greater severity.

  19. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Improvement: Among Biomarker-Defined Subgroups of Participants

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 12 in biomarker-defined subgroups.

  20. Percentage of Participants with Endoscopic Improvement: Among Biomarker-Defined Subgroups of Participants

    Time frame: At Week 52

    Percentage of participants achieving endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (normal appearance of mucosa or mild disease) at Week 52 in biomarker-defined subgroups.

  21. Change in Bowel Urgency

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 52

    Change in bowel urgency from baseline through Week 52. Bowel urgency is measured on a scale from 0 (None) to 4 (Severe).

  22. Change in Abdominal Pain

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 52

    Change in abdominal pain from baseline through Week 52. Abdominal pain is measured on a scale from 0 (None) to 4 (Severe).

  23. Change in Fatigue

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 52

    Change in fatigue as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) from baseline to Week 12 and Week 52. FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item self-reported assessment of the level and impact of fatigue. The overall FACIT-Fatigue score ranges between 0 and 52, with higher scores associated with better quality of life concerns related to fatigue.

  24. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 and Week 52

    Change in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score from baseline to Week 12 and Week 52. IBDQ is a 32-item self-reported assessment of health-related quality of life in participants with inflammatory bowel disease. The overall IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with higher scores associated with better health-related quality of life.

  25. Overall Change in UC Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2, Week 12, and Week 52

    Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) from baseline to Weeks 2, 12 and 52. PGIC measures overall change in ulcerative colitis symptoms from "Much better" to "Much worse".

  26. Overall Severity in UC Symptoms

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 2, Week 12, and Week 52

    Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) from baseline to Weeks 2, 12 and 52. PGIS measures severity of ulcerative colitis symptoms from "None" to "Very severe".

  27. Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Up to 70 Weeks after Baseline

    Incidence and severity of AEs, including serious AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation and AEs of special interest.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Collaborators

  • Chugai Pharmaceutical

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Treat-Through Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Induction and Maintenance Therapy With RO7790121 in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

Acronym: Ametrine-1

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2031
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.