Talazoparib
DrugTalazoparib 1 mg orally once daily.
Other names: MDV3800, BMN673
NCT Number: NCT03042910
This study is designed to evaluate the effects of talazoparib on cardiac repolarization in patients with advanced solid tumors with no available standard treatment options.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
CBCC Global Research, Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Bakersfield, California, United States
For further talazoparib treatment, patients must enroll and initiate continued talazoparib treatment in a separate open label extension study within 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Talazoparib 1 mg orally once daily.
Other names: MDV3800, BMN673
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
QT interval is the time from electrocardiogram Q wave to the end of the T wave corresponding to electrical systole.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1) to Day 22
A linear mixed effects modeling approach was used to examine the relationship between the change from baseline in QTcF and the plasma concentration of talazoparib. The model included plasma concentration, time (categorical), and treatment with random participant effects on plasma concentration and the intercept. Equation used for modeling was: Y_lkt= μ_l+ p_t+ θ × C_lkt + W_k + D_k × C_kt + ε_lkt, where the dependent variable Y_lkt was for the l (treatment), k (participants) and t (time point). Parameter were: μ_l was the treatment specific intercept, θ was the slope, C was the concentration, W_k was the random patient effect on the intercept, D_k was the random patient effect on the slope, p_t was the time effect on the intercept and ε_lkt was the residual error.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1) to Day 22
A linear mixed effects modeling approach was used to examine the relationship between the change from baseline in QTcF and the plasma concentration of talazoparib. The model included plasma concentration, time (categorical), and treatment with random participant effects on plasma concentration and the intercept. Equation used for modeling was: Y_lkt= μ_l+ p_t+ θ × C_lkt+ W_k+ D_k × C_kt+ ε_lkt, where the dependent variable Y_lkt was for the l (treatment), k (participants) and t (time point). Parameter were: μ_l was the treatment specific intercept, θ was the slope, C was the concentration, W_k was the random patient effect on the intercept, D_k was the random patient effect on the slope, p_t was the time effect on the intercept and ε_lkt was the residual error.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
QT interval is the time from electrocardiogram Q wave to the end of the T wave corresponding to electrical systole.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
PR interval is the time between the beginning of the P wave and the start of the QRS interval, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
QRS interval is the time from electrocardiogram Q wave to the end of the S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
QT interval is the time from electrocardiogram Q wave to the end of the T wave corresponding to electrical systole.
Time frame: Baseline (Day -1 time matched for each time point); 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose on Day 2; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
RR interval is the time elapsing between two consecutive R waves in the electrocardiogram.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 22
Morphological analyses were performed with regard to the ECG waveform interpretation as defined by the central ECG laboratory's cardiologist. Numbers of participants with new onsets for the following variables were counted: atrial fibrillation or flutter, second-degree heart block, third degree heart block, complete right bundle branch block, complete left bundle branch block, ST segment depression, ST segment elevation, T-wave abnormalities (negative T waves only), myocardial infarction pattern, and any new abnormal U waves. "New" was defined as "not present on any baseline ECG but present on any on-treatment ECG". Number of participants with abnormality in any of the variables were reported.
Time frame: Baseline (mean of all ECGs on Day -1 and pre-dose on Day 1) to Day 22
Criteria for clinically significant: Maximum QTcF >450 msec, Maximum QTcF >480 msec, Maximum QTcF >500 msec, Maximum QTcB >450 msec, Maximum QTcB >480 msec, Maximum QTcB >500 msec, Maximum QT Interval >500 msec, Maximum QTcF Increase <=30 msec, Maximum QTcF Increase 30 to <=60 msec, Maximum QTcF Increase <=60 msec, Maximum PR interval increase >200 msec and >=25%, Maximum QRS interval increase >100 msec and >=25%, Maximum heart rate increase >100 bpm and >25% and Maximum heart rate decrease <50 bpm and >25%.
Time frame: Day 1 to follow-up (30 days post last dose, i.e. up to 52 days)
An adverse event(AE)was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, whether or not related to the study drug. A serious adverse event(SAE)was an AE that resulted in: death; persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions; congenital anomaly/birth defect; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) are AEs occurred on or after the administration of study drug. AEs related to study drug was any AE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator. AEs of special interest were diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and abnormal liver test results that met predefined criteria.
Time frame: Screening (Day -29 to Day -2) to follow-up (30 days post last dose on Day 22)
Clinically notable changes included: High systolic blood pressure (SBP):>=155 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) with increase >=30 mmHg, low SBP <=90 mmHg with decrease >=20 mmHg, Both high and low SBP (i.e high SBP >=155 mmHg with increase >=30 mmHg and low SBP <=90 mmHg with decrease >=20 mmHg), High diastolic blood pressure (DBP):>=100 mmHg with increase >=15 mmHg), Low DBP (<=50 mmHg with decrease >=15 mmHg), Both high and low DBP, Heart rate >=100 bpm with increase >=30 bpm, Heart rate <=50 bpm with decrease >=15 bpm, Respiratory rate >=25 bpm, Respiratory rate <10 bpm, Oral body temperature >39 degree and Oral body temperature <=35 degree.
Time frame: Baseline to follow-up (30 days post last dose on Day 22, i.e. up to Day 52)
Laboratory test included: hematology (hematocrit, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volum, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count with differential [total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, and lymphocytes]),chemistry (albumin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, non-fasting glucose, carbon dioxide, calcium, chloride, magnesium, phosphate, potassium, sodium and lactate dehydrogenase), and additional tests (urine or serum pregnancy tests for women of childbearing potential). Clinically significant laboratory abnormality was determined by the investigator.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
Day 22 subpopulation: amongst the participants with reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters on Day 22, exclusion of values from the summary statistics calculations due to dose modifications (eg, dose interruptions, dose reductions) was handled on a case by case basis, resulting in a subpopulation of participants with no prior dose modifications.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
Day 22 subpopulation: amongst the participants with reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters on Day 22, exclusion of values from the summary statistics calculations due to dose modifications (eg, dose interruptions, dose reductions) was handled on a case by case basis, resulting in a subpopulation of participants with no prior dose modifications.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1; pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
Day 22 subpopulation: amongst the participants with reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters on Day 22, exclusion of values from the summary statistics calculations due to dose modifications (eg, dose interruptions, dose reductions) was handled on a case by case basis, resulting in a subpopulation of participants with no prior dose modifications.
Time frame: Pre-dose, Day 22
Day 22 subpopulation: amongst the participants with reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters on Day 22, exclusion of values from the summary statistics calculations due to dose modifications (eg, dose interruptions, dose reductions) was handled on a case by case basis, resulting in a subpopulation of participants with no prior dose modifications.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes). Clearance obtained after intravenous infusion dose (apparent clearance) is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Day 22 subpopulation: amongst the participants with reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters on Day 22, exclusion of values from the summary statistics calculations due to dose modifications (eg, dose interruptions, dose reductions) was handled on a case by case basis, resulting in a subpopulation of participants with no prior dose modifications.
Time frame: Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose on Day 22
Rac was calculated as, area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval on Day 22 (AUCtau) divided by area under the curve from time zero to end of dosing interval on Day 1 (AUCtau). Area under the concentration curve from time 0 to end of dosing interval (AUCtau), where dosing interval was 6 hours. Day 22 subpopulation: amongst the participants with reported pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters on Day 22, exclusion of values from the summary statistics calculations due to dose modifications (eg, dose interruptions, dose reductions) was handled on a case by case basis, resulting in a subpopulation of participants with no prior dose modifications.
Pfizer
Industry
A PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL STUDY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF TALAZOPARIB ON CARDIAC REPOLARIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05507736
Diarrhea, Neoplasms
Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06209385
Solid Tumor
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05991349
Solid Tumor
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05708950
Adnexal Diseases, Breast Cancer
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial Details