Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07095452

A Study to Assess A Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Intravenous Etentamig and Daratumumab (Etentamig+D) Compared to Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Adult Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Eligible for Transplant

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of the blood's plasma cells. The cancer is typically found in the bones and bone marrow (the spongy tissue inside of the bones) and can cause bone pain, fractures, infections, weaker bones, and kidney failure. This is a study to determine the adverse events, change in disease activity, and pharmacokinetics of Etentamig in adult participants with MM.

Etentamig is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of MM. This study is broken into 2 phases; phase 2 with 3 study arms and phase 3 with 2 study arms. Participants in phase 2 will receive 1 of 3 doses of etentamig in combination with daratumumab. Participants in phase 3 will receive etentamig at RP3D in combination with daratumumab, or daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd). Around 660 adult participants with MM will be enrolled at approximately 155 sites worldwide

Participants in phase 2 will receive 1 of 3 doses of etentamig as intravenous (IV) infusions, combination with subcutaneous (SC) injections of daratumumab. Participants in phase 3 will receive RP3D doses of etentamig as IV infusions, combination with SC injections of daratumumab, or SC injections of daratumumab, capsules of lenalidomide, and tablet/ IV injections of dexamethasone (DRd). The study duration is approximately 16 years.

There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effect of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and questionnaires.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois /ID# 278406, Epagny Metz Tessy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have confirmed new diagnosis of multiple myeloma (NDMM) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria, and per investigator's judgement, participant is not suitable to receive high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation due to factors likely to have a negative impact on tolerability of high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT).
  • IMWG Myeloma Frailty Index Score of >= 1
  • All participants must have measurable disease per central laboratory with at least 1 of the following assessed within 28 days prior to enrollment:
  • Serum M-protein >= 0.5 g/dL (>= 5 g/L).
  • Urine M-protein >= 200 mg/24 hours.
  • Serum free light chain (FLC) >= 100 mg/L (>= 10 mg/dL) (involved light chain) and an abnormal serum kappa lambda ratio only for participants without measurable serum or urine M-protein.

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior or current systemic therapy or stem cell transplant (SCT) for multiple myeloma or any plasma cell dyscrasia other than short course of corticosteroids
  • Participant treated with any investigational treatment within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the treatment (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study treatment or is currently enrolled in another clinical study
  • Participant who has known active central nervous system involvement of MM.
  • Participant who has history of clinically significant renal, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, metabolic, immunologic, pulmonary, or hepatic disease within the last 6 months that, in the investigator's opinion, would adversely affect the participant's participation in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Etentamig

Drug

Intravenous (IV) Infusion

Lenalidomide

Drug

Oral Capsule

Daratumumab

Drug

Subcutaneous Injection

Dexamethasone

Drug

Oral Tablet

Primary outcomes

  1. Phase 2 and 3: Percentage of Participants with Adverse Events (AE)s

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

  2. Phase 2: Change in Clinical Activity

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 52 weeks

    Clinical activity is defined as change in response rates [Overall Response Rate (ORR), Complete Response (CR) or Better, Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Partial Response (PR)] as determined International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG (2016).

  3. Phase 3: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative CR Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 52 weeks

    MRDnegCR rate, is defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved stringent complete response (sCR) or CR as assessed by independent review committee (IRC) and have negative MRD defined at 10^-5 threshold as assessed by next generation sequencing (NGS).

  4. Phase 3: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 130 Months

    PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed disease progression (PD) determined by IRC per IMWG (2016) response criteria, or death, whichever occurs first.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase 2: MRD Negative CR Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 52 Weeks

    MRDnegCR rate, is defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved sCR or CR and have negative MRD defined at 10^-5 threshold as assessed by NGS.

  2. Phase 2: PFS

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 130 Months

    PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed disease progression (PD) determined by IRC per IMWG (2016) response criteria, or death, whichever occurs first.

  3. Phase 2: Sustained MRD Negativity Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    The rate of sustained MRD-negativity is defined as the percentage of participants with maintenance of MRD negativity status in bone marrow confirmed >=12 months apart prior to initiation of new anti-MM therapy.

  4. Phase 2: Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve (AUC)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC).

  5. Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    OS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.

  6. Phase 2: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    Incidence, severity, seriousness, and causality of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

  7. Phase 2: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    Maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax).

  8. Phase 2: Time to Cmax (Time to Maximum Observed Concentration, Tmax)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    Time to Cmax.

  9. Phase 2: Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 90 days after the last dose of study treatment

    Positive ADAs.

  10. Phase 2: Negative ADAs

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 90 days after the last dose of study treatment

    Negative ADAs.

  11. Phase 2: Neutralizing Anti-Drug Antibodies (NAbs)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 90 days after the last dose of study treatment

    Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (NAbs).

  12. Phase 3: OS

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    OS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.

  13. Phase 3: Sustained MRD Negativity Rate

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    The rate of sustained MRD-negativity is defined as the percentage of participants with maintenance of MRD negativity status in bone marrow confirmed >=12 months apart prior to initiation of new anti-MM therapy.

  14. Phase 3: Rate of >= CR

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    The rate of >= CR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a sCR or CR determined by IMWG (2016) response criteria, per IRC assessment, prior to the initiation of new anti-myeloma therapy.

  15. Phase 3: Rate of >= VGPR or Better

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    The rate of >= VGPR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a VGPR or better determined by IMWG (2016) response criteria, per IRC assessment, prior to the initiation of new anti-myeloma therapy.

  16. Phase 3: ORR

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 52 Weeks

    ORR is defined as percentage of participants with a response of PR or better per IMWG criteria.

  17. Phase 3: Time to Response (TTR)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 12 Months

    TTR is defined as the number of months from the date of first dose to the date of best overall response of CR or PR ('responders') determined by IMWG criteria as assessed by investigator.

  18. Phase 3: Duration of Response (DOR)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    DOR is defined as the number of days from the day the response criteria are met to the date that disease progression.

  19. Phase 3: Time-to-Progression (TTP)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    Time to progression is defined as the number of days from the date of study drug start to the date of the first documented disease progression or relapse.

  20. Phase 3: Event Free Survival (EFS)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    EFS will be measured as the number of days between the initiation of the studied line of therapy and disease progression, or refractory disease, or death.

  21. Phase 3: Progression-Free Survival on Subsequent Therapy (PFS2)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    PFS2 is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to the date of confirmed disease progression or death on the next line of therapy.

  22. Phase 3: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    Incidence, severity, seriousness, and causality of TEAEs

  23. Phase 3: Change from Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning Score

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item patient-reported questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales including 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/QoL scale, and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Subjects rate items on a 4- point scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1 = Not at All, 2 = A Little, 3 = Quite a Bit, and 4 = Very Much).

  24. Phase 3: Change from Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL Score

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item patient-reported questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales including 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/QoL scale, and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Subjects rate items on a 4- point scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1 = Not at All, 2 = A Little, 3 = Quite a Bit, and 4 = Very Much).

  25. Phase 3: Change from Baseline and Time to Deterioration in the Remaining Scales and Items of EORTC QLQ-C30

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item patient-reported questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales including 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status/QoL scale, and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Subjects rate items on a 4- point scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1 = Not at All, 2 = A Little, 3 = Quite a Bit, and 4 = Very Much).

  26. Phase 3: Symptomatic AEs as Assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    PRO-CTCAE includes 124 items representing 78 symptomatic toxicities drawn from the CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE items evaluate the symptom attributes of frequency, severity, interference, amount, presence/absence. All questions employ a 7-day recall period and are scored from 0 to 4 (or 0/1 for absent/present).

  27. Phase 3: Overall Bother Due to Treatment Side Effects as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) GP5

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    The FACT-G GP5 Item is a part of the FACT-G which is a 27-item questionnaire that measures four domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients: physical, social, emotional and functional well-being. The FACT-G GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") is used to assess overall treatment tolerability in patients by assessing the overall side effect impact on patients. This item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" to "very much.".

  28. Phase 3: Change from Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) Scores

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    The PGIS scale asks the patient to assess their overall QoL, as well as difficulty of doing physical activities due to MM over the past 7 days. Each item employs a 5-point Likert scale from "not at all" to "very much."

  29. Phase 3: Change from Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Scores

    Time frame: Up to Approximately 16 Years

    The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

ABBVIE CALL CENTER

CONTACT

[email protected]

844-663-3742

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AbbVie

Industry

Collaborators

  • IFM (Intergroupe Français du Myélome); PETHEMA (Program for the Study and Treatment of Haematological Malignances)

Registry information

Official study title

Phase 2/3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Etentamig and Daratumumab (Etentamig+D) Compared to Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Eligible for Transplant

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2042
Study completion
2042
First posted
Jul 31, 2025
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.