Tiotropium Respimat® (T1)
Druginhalation solution
NCT Number: NCT03964207
The objective of this study is to investigate the patient acceptability/preference of Respimat® compared with Handihaler® in patients with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to demonstrate the superiority of Respimat®.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
inhalation solution
Inhalation Powder
Time frame: After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8)
The score on the performance domain of the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The performance domain score is the sum of 7 questions (Q) within the domain (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q10 and Q11), the range for each question went from 1 to 7 the higher the better. The score was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale following ((Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5+Q10+Q11)/49)*100, the higher the better performance. The performance domain of PASAPQ) was analysed using Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM), with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect. Compound symmetry was used as a covariance structure for within-patient variation.
Time frame: After 4 weeks of treatment (at week 4 and week 8)
The total score on the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) after 4 weeks of treatment is reported. The Total score is the sum of 13 questions (Q1-Q13) and then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale. This continuous secondary endpoint was analyzed using a similar MMRM model as for the primary endpoint.
Time frame: At Week 8.
The percentage of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The questionnaire PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part II of the PASAPQ the stand-alone question 15 (Q15) was asked for a response to indicate the preference for the trial device, it had three possible answers: "I prefer Respimat", "I prefer Handihaler", "No answer to this question " and "no preference". Chi-squared test was used to analyze proportion of patients indicating preference in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8.
Time frame: At the end of 4 weeks of treatment
The overall satisfaction question score in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 4 and 8 is reported (after 4 weeks of treatment). In Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ: the Question 14 (Q14) asked for the overall satisfaction with the device used in the study. Q14 had Likert-type response options of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied) and was then transformed to a 0 (least) to 100 (most) point scale (if a patient scored "x", the transfer to 0-100 scale was x/7*100). Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the overall satisfaction question score, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect.
Time frame: At Week 8.
The score on willingness to continue in the Patient satisfaction and preference questionnaire (PASAPQ) at week 8 is reported. The PASAPQ is a two part questionnaire, in Part I of the questionnaire PASAPQ the Question 16 (Q16) asked for a response between 0 and 100 with 0 indicating not willing to continue using the trial device and 100 indicating definitely willingness to continue. Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the score on willingness to continue, with treatment and period as fixed effects, and patient as a random effect.
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
A Randomized, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Study to Compare Patient Acceptability/Preference of Tiotropium Respimat® With Tiotropium Handihaler® in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07252908
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Chongqing, Chognqing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07649577
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Amman, Jordan
View Trial DetailsNCT06979518
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Cypress, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06367686
Apnea, Chronic Disease
Tønsberg, Norway
View Trial Details