Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07162662

A Study on the Modulation of Gut Microbiota by Oral Sialic Acid in Healthy Subjects

This is a single-center prospective cohort study conducted by the Department of General Surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Xinqiao Hospital). The purpose of this study is to explore and clarify the effects of sialic acid intervention on gut microbiota structure, with a focus on the proliferation of pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae), and to develop novel prevention and treatment strategies for improving intestinal homeostasis.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Background:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common gastrointestinal malignancies worldwide, ranking third in incidence and second in mortality among all cancers. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment for CRC, particularly for early- and mid-stage patients, as it effectively removes tumor tissue and prolongs survival. However, postoperative anastomotic healing failure (e.g., anastomotic leakage) is a severe complication of colorectal surgery, with an incidence rate of 5%-20%. Anastomotic leakage not only significantly increases postoperative mortality but also prolongs hospital stays, escalates medical costs, and imposes a heavy burden on both patients and healthcare systems. The pathogenesis of anastomotic leakage is complex, involving factors such as local ischemia, surgical technique, infection, and gut microbiota dysbiosis. In recent years, with advancements in microbiomics research, the role of gut microbiota in anastomotic healing has gained increasing attention.

During malignant transformation, colorectal cancer cells exhibit significantly upregulated expression of sialic acid (SA) on their cell surfaces. Sialic acid, a class of nine-carbon monosaccharides widely distributed on mammalian cell surfaces, participates in cell-cell recognition, immune regulation, and host-microbe interactions. Studies have shown that shed sialic acid from colorectal tumor cells enters the intestinal lumen, serving as a critical nutrient source for gut microbes. Notably, certain pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae) can utilize sialic acid as a carbon source to promote their proliferation and colonization. These pathogens may impair anastomotic healing through multiple mechanisms: first, by disrupting the intestinal mucosal barrier and exacerbating local inflammation; second, by inhibiting epithelial cell repair and delaying tissue regeneration; and third, by producing toxins or metabolites that further damage local tissues. Thus, colorectal tumor-derived sialic acid may indirectly increase the risk of postoperative anastomotic healing failure by nourishing specific pathogens.

Although existing research suggests that sialic acid from colorectal tumors influences the gut microenvironment by feeding pathogens, the specific mechanisms underlying its impact on postoperative anastomotic healing remain unclear. This hypothesis requires experimental validation. Our preliminary animal studies have demonstrated that oral administration of sialic acid impairs rectal anastomotic healing in mice by modulating gut microbiota. This finding indicates that sialic acid may affect postoperative anastomotic tissue repair and inflammatory responses by altering gut microbiota structure. However, research on the effects of sialic acid on the human gut microbiota remains limited. Based on this background, the present study aims to characterize the impact of sialic acid on gut microbiota by analyzing fecal samples collected from volunteers following oral sialic acid intervention.

Study Design: This study employs a before-after self-control trial design, recruiting 42 volunteers to take oral sialic acid and collecting fecal samples before and after the intervention. Specifically, the control group specimens were fecal samples collected before oral sialic acid administration, while the experimental group specimens were fecal samples collected after oral sialic acid administration.

Primary Objective:Alterations in Gut Microbiota Structure

Key Outcomes: Data Analysis: Data extracted from electronic medical records. Statistical analysis using SPSS 22.0 (χ² test for categorical data, t-test for normally distributed continuous data; significance p<0.05).

Ethics: Approved by the institutional ethics committee. Conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Chinese regulations. Patient privacy and data confidentiality are prioritized.

Timeline: Patient data collection and analysis (Sep 2025-Aug 2026); Statistical analysis and manuscript preparation (Sep-Dec 2025).

Significance:The purpose of this study is to explore and clarify the effects of sialic acid intervention on gut microbiota structure, with a focus on the proliferation of pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae), and to develop novel prevention and treatment strategies for improving intestinal homeostasis

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 18 and 75 years
  • No history of major diseases, no previous surgical history, and no history of cardiometabolic diseases (such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, etc.)
  • No use of drugs that may affect gut microbiota or metabolic function (e.g., antibiotics, probiotics, immunosuppressants, etc.);
  • Voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Comorbidities: Complicated with other severe diseases (e.g., immunodeficiency, chronic liver disease, renal insufficiency, malignant tumors, etc.).
  • Recent infections: Registration records indicate a history of severe infections in the recent period (within 3 months) or currently receiving anti-infective treatment.
  • Special populations: Pregnant women, lactating women, or women planning to become pregnant.
  • Poor compliance: Volunteers who are unable to cooperate with the study protocol or follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Oral Sialic acid

Dietary Supplement

This study employs a before-after self-control trial design, recruiting 42 volunteers to take oral sialic acid and collecting fecal samples before and after the intervention.

Primary outcomes

  1. Alterations in Gut Microbiota Structure

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks

    Gut microbiota data analysis: Perform sequence analysis and OTU clustering using QIIME2 or Mothur; compare microbial diversity (α-diversity and β-diversity) between the experimental group and control group, as well as changes in the abundance of specific microbiota (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae); use LEfSe analysis to screen for microbiota with significant changes after sialic acid intervention, and predict changes in microbial functions via PICRUSt

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Guangsheng DU, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86 18716286196

Xiaolong Li, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86 15025326575

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Xiaolong Li

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Modulation of Gut Microbiota by Oral Sialic Acid: A Mechanistic Study

Acronym: MFMOSA

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Sep 9, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.