Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04252287

A Study on Impact of Canagliflozin on Health Status, Quality of Life, and Functional Status in Heart Failure

The purpose of this study is to determine the superiority of the effectiveness of canagliflozin 100 milligram (mg) daily versus placebo in participants with symptomatic heart failure (HF) in improving the overall Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total Symptom Score (TSS).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Mercy Clinic Cardiology - Fort Smith, Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have clinically stable symptomatic heart failure (HF) (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF] and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF]): (A) For HFrEF: (a) ejection fraction (EF) less than or equal to (<=) 40 percent (%) and (b) a primary diagnosis of HF OR 2 medical visits (including virtual) with a HF diagnosis code in any position in the past 18 months (B) For HFpEF: (a) EF greater than (>) 40%; (b) a primary diagnosis of HF OR 2 medical visits (including virtual) with a HF diagnosis code in any position in the past 18 months, AND; (C) on a loop diuretic or spironolactone or eplerenone (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists), in the past 18 months
  • Have a baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score of less than or equal to (<=) 80 prior to randomization
  • Be able to read and understand English
  • Possess and have sole use (example: not shared with other users) of smartphone compatible with the Fitbit device
  • Willing/able to wear the Fitbit device on a regular basis for the 9-month study period

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently taking a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) or within the last 3 months
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis or have type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)
  • Have acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of symptomatic HF) requiring intravenous diuretics, inotropes, or vasodilators within the last 4 weeks
  • Have stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease (that is, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 milliliter per minute [ml/min] on dialysis) from the most recent assessment
  • Have a diagnosis of hypotension within 30 days

Treatment and study plan

Canagliflozin 100 mg

Drug

Participants will receive 100 mg immediate-release, over-encapsulated tablets (as a capsule) orally once daily.

Other names: JNJ-28431754, INVOKANA

Placebo

Drug

Participants will receive matching placebo capsules orally once daily.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS was reported. KCCQ was a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire that measure the participant's perception of their health status, including their heart failure (HF) symptoms, impact on physical and social function and how their HF impacts the quality of life. KCCQ quantifies 7 domains: physical limitations (6 items), symptom stability (1 item), symptom frequency (4 items), symptom burden (3 items), self-efficacy (2 items), quality of life (3 items) and social limitations (4 items). Scores were generated for each domain and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status. KCCQ-TSS was average of domains- symptom frequency and symptom burden, and transformed to a single score which ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (the best possible status), where the higher score reflected better health status.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Total Daily Step Count at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Change from baseline in total daily step count at Week 12 was reported in this outcome measure. The number of steps taken per day was measured using a step activity monitor at baseline and throughout the study. Step count was measured from the Fitbit device data. The Fitbit app on the participant's phone collected all data from the Fitbit device. A negative change from baseline indicated a decrease in the number of daily steps.

  2. Change From Baseline in KCCQ Individual Domain Scores (Physical Limitation and Quality of Life) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Change from baseline in KCCQ physical limitation score and KCCQ quality of life score were reported. KCCQ was a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire that measure the participant's perception of their health status, including their heart failure (HF) symptoms, impact on physical and social function and how their HF impacts the quality of life. KCCQ quantifies 7 domains: physical limitations (6 items), symptom stability (1 item), symptom frequency (4 items), symptom burden (3 items), self-efficacy (2 items), quality of life (3 items) and social limitations (4 items). Scores were generated for each domain and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 (worst) and 100 (the best possible status), where the higher score reflected better health status.

  3. Change From Baseline in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Change from baseline in KCCQ-clinical summary score was reported. KCCQ was a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire that measure the participant's perception of their health status, including their heart failure (HF) symptoms, impact on physical and social function and how their HF impacts the quality of life. KCCQ quantifies 7 domains: physical limitations (6 items), symptom stability (1 item), symptom frequency (4 items), symptom burden (3 items), self-efficacy (2 items), quality of life (3 items) and social limitations (4 items). Scores were generated for each domain and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status. KCCQ-clinical summary score was average of domains- physical limitation and total symptoms (average of symptom frequency and symptom burden), and transformed to a single score which ranged from 0 (worst) -100 (the best possible status), where the higher score reflected better health status.

  4. Change From Baseline in KCCQ Overall Summary Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Change from baseline in KCCQ-overall summary score was reported. KCCQ was a 23-item, self-administered questionnaire that measure the participant's perception of their health status, including their heart failure (HF) symptoms, impact on physical and social function and how their HF impacts the quality of life. KCCQ quantifies 7 domains: physical limitations (6 items), symptom stability (1 item), symptom frequency (4 items), symptom burden (3 items), self-efficacy (2 items), quality of life (3 items) and social limitations (4 items). Scores were generated for each domain and scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible status. KCCQ- overall summary score was average of domains- physical limitation, total symptoms (average of symptom frequency and symptom burden), quality of life, and social limitation, and transformed to a single score which ranged from 0 (worst) -100 (the best possible status), where the higher score reflected better health status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Canagliflozin: Impact on Health Status, Quality of Life, and Functional Status in Heart Failure

Acronym: CHIEF-HF

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 5, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.