Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01488071

A Study of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Comparison to Agomelatine in Adults Suffering From Major Depression With Inadequate Response to Previous Medication

The objective of the present study is to evaluate whether vortioxetine (10 or 20 mg/day) is at least as effective as agomelatine (25 to 50 mg/day) in patients with depressive symptoms that showed inadequate response to Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SRI) antidepressants.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patient is being treated with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) antidepressant (monotherapy) that was prescribed to treat Major Depressive Episode (DSM-IV-TR criteria)
  • The response to the current SRI treatment is inadequate and patient agrees to discontinue the current SRI at the baseline
  • Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ≥22 at the Screening Visit and Baseline
  • The patient, if a woman, must: agree not to try to become pregnant during the study, AND use adequate, highly effective contraception

Exclusion criteria

  • The patient has any current Axis I disorders (DSM-IV criteria) other than Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD)
  • The patient is at significant risk of suicide
  • The patient is currently receiving formal psychotherapy or other psychoactive medications

Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)

Drug

encapsulated tablets, daily, orally

Other names: Brintellix®

Agomelatine

Drug

encapsulated tablets, daily, orally

Other names: Valdoxan®

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change From Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behaviour at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic, and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total score from 0 to 56; higher score indicates greater anxiety, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in symptoms.

  3. Change From Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The investigator should use his/her total clinical experience with this patient population to judge how mentally ill the patient is at the time of rating. Higher score indicates that the subject is more ill, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in symptoms.

  5. Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Change in Clinical Status Using CGI-I Score at Week 8

    Time frame: Week 8

    The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator rated the patient's overall improvement relative to baseline, whether or not, in the opinion of the investigator, this was entirely due to the drug treatment. Higher score = more affected.

  7. Change in Clinical Status Using CGI-I Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

  8. Proportion of Patients Who Respond at Week 8 (Response Defined as a >=50% Decrease in the MADRS Total Score From Baseline)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

  9. Proportion of Patients Who Respond at Week 12 (Response Defined as a >=50% Decrease in the MADRS Total Score From Baseline)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  10. Proportion of Patients Who Are in Remission at Week 8 (Remission is Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)

    Time frame: Week 8

  11. Proportion of Patients Who Are in Remission at Week 12 (Remission is Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)

    Time frame: Week 12

  12. Change From Baseline in SDS Total Score at Week 8

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

    The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). The higher the score, the more severe, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in symptoms.

  13. Change From Baseline in SDS Total Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

H. Lundbeck A/S

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-controlled, Flexible Dose Study Evaluating the Effects of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 Versus Agomelatine in Adult Patients Suffering From Major Depressive Disorder With Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Treatment

Acronym: REVIVE

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2012
First posted
Dec 8, 2011
Registry last updated
Mar 26, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.