Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00531817

A Study of Tocilizumab in Combination With DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

This 2-arm study assessed the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab versus placebo, both in combination with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), in regard to reduction in signs and symptoms, in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to DMARDs. Patients were randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or placebo IV every 4 weeks. All patients also received stable antirheumatic therapy, including permitted DMARDs. The anticipated time on study treatment was 3-12 months and the target sample size was 500+ individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients, ≥18 years of age
  • Active rheumatoid arthritis of >6 months duration
  • Received permitted DMARDs each at a stable dose for at least 7 weeks prior to baseline

Exclusion criteria

  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease or inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned within 6 months following randomization
  • Unsuccessful treatment with a biologic agent, including an anti-TNF agent
  • Previous treatment with tocilizumab

Treatment and study plan

Tocilizumab

Drug

Tocilizumab intravenously at a dose of 8 mg/kg over a 1-hour infusion, every 4 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions.

Other names: Actemra, RoActemra

Placebo

Drug

Placebo IV over a 1-hour infusion, every 4 weeks, for a total of 6 infusions.

Permitted DMARDs

Drug

As prescribed. The following DMARDs were permitted in this study: methotrexate (MTX), chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, parenteral gold, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and leflunomide. These DMARDs could be used alone or in combination, except for the combination of MTX and leflunomide, which was not allowed.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 50% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR50) From Baseline at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters. Patient and physician assessment of patient disease activity (DA) in previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, no DA to maximum DA); patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (none to unbearable); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and C-reactive protein or, if missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20, ACR50, ACR70) From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

    Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters. Patient and physician assessment of patient disease activity (DA) in previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, no DA to maximum DA); patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (none to unbearable); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and C reactive protein or, if missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

    DAS28 was calculated using the following formula: 0.56 × sqrt(TJC) + 0.28 × sqrt(SJC) + 0.70 × ln(ESR) + 0.014 × GH, where TJC = tender joint count on 28 joints, SJC = swollen joint count on 28 joints, ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate at the current visit (mm/hr), and GH = general health, ie, the patient's global assessment of disease activity (DA) in the previous 24 hours on a 100 mm visual analog scale (no DA to maximum DA). The DAS28 score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more rheumatoid arthritis. A negative change score indicates improvement.

  3. Percentage of Patients With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good, Moderate, or no Response at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Change of the DAS28 score from baseline was used to determine the EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in the Routine Assessment Patient Index Data (RAPID) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Derived from the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), the RAPID includes 3 domains that assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: A physical function score (MDHAQ items 1a-j), a pain visual analog scale score (VAS, item 2 in the MDHAQ), and a global assessment of disease activity VAS score (item 6 in the MDHAQ). Each domain is scored on a scale of 0-10. The RAPID score is the sum of the 3 domain scores divided by 3 resulting in a total score on a scale of 0-10. Higher scores indicate more disease activity and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in 12-Item Short Form Health Survey v2 (SF-12) Scores at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    The SF-12 is a self-report measure of general health status with 1 or 2 items for each of 8 domains: Physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Two component summaries, physical (PCS-12) and mental (MCS-12) were calculated using norm-based scoring, resulting in means of 50 and standard deviations of 10 in the 1998 general United States population. Higher scores represent better health and a positive change from baseline represents improvement.

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    The FACIT-F is a 13-item patient self-report questionnaire that assesses fatigue over the previous 7 days by scoring each item on a 5-point scale (0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Very much). An overall FACIT-F score was obtained by summing the scores of all 13 items. The overall score ranged from 0 to 52. A lower score indicates less fatigue. A negative change score indicates improvement.

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Time frame: Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item patient self-report instrument that assesses the quality and quantity of sleep over the previous 4 weeks. A sleep problems index (SLP9) was generated using 9 of the 12 items (1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12). Each item was normalized so that the lowest and highest possible scores were set to 0 and 100, respectively. The SLP9 score is the average of the recoded 9 items. The SLP9 score ranged from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent greater sleep problems. A negative change score indicates improvement.

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Individual Components of the Routine Assessment Patient Index Data (RAPID) at Each Day During the First 7 Days of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 7

    Derived from the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), the RAPID includes 3 domains that assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: A physical function score (0-10), a pain visual analog scale score (VAS, 0-100), and a global assessment of disease activity VAS score (0-100). Each domain was assessed with the Patient Take Home Form (PTHF). Higher scores indicate more disease activity. A negative change score indicates improvement.

  9. Percentage of Patients With an Improvement of at Least 20%, 50%, or 70% in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Score (ACR20, ACR50, ACR70) From Baseline at Day 7

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 7

    Improvement must be seen in tender and swollen joint counts and in at least 3 of the following 5 parameters. Patient and physician assessment of patient disease activity (DA) in previous 24 hours on a visual analog scale (VAS, no DA to maximum DA); patient assessment of pain in previous 24 hours on a VAS (none to unbearable); Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do); and C reactive protein or, if missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP) at Days 3 and 7

    Time frame: Baseline to Days 3 and 7

    Serum concentration of CRP (high-sensitivity CRP [hsCRP] test) was analyzed by a central laboratory.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Tocilizumab (TCZ) Versus Placebo in Combination With Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Acronym: ROSE

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2011
First posted
Sep 19, 2007
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.