Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00996203

A Study of Tocilizumab Added to DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs.

This open-label single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab added to traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to DMARDs. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks, in addition to their current non-biologic DMARDs at stable doses. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and the target sample size is 200.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Rheumatology, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis of >/=6 months duration
  • inadequate clinical response to current non-biologic DMARDs
  • current DMARDs must be at stable dose for 8 weeks prior to study entry
  • oral corticosteroids (</=10mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs must be at stable dose for >/=4 weeks prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

  • rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA
  • history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA
  • previous treatment with any biologic DMARD
  • functional class IV as defined by the ACR classification
  • intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to screening

Treatment and study plan

tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

Drug

8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs)

Drug

stable doses at investigator's prescription

Primary outcomes

  1. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 and Withdrawal Visit

    HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Withdrawal Visit is the final visit prior to the withdrawal of the subject from the study.

  2. Percentage of Participants With an HAQ Score Decrease of 20 Percent (%), 50%, and 70% During Tocilizumab Treatment

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.

  3. Change in HAQ Score at Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    HAQ includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Score as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a 100-millimeter (mm) horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=pain absent and 100=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain.

  2. European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Score

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

  3. Change in EQ-5D Score at Week 24 From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    EQ-5D questionnaire assess 5 domains of quality of life including mobility, self-care, habitual daily activities, pain, discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each of five domains was assessed by 3 levels depending on severity of a problem and scored using the following: 1=no disturbances, 2=moderate disturbances, 3=severe disturbances. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. Minimum clinically significant change in EQ-5D corresponds to the parameter differences before and after treatment = 0.10. Graduations of assessment of the therapy efficacy by EQ-5D are: Difference (Δ) EQ-5D less than (<)0.10 points: none; 0.10 less than or equal to (≤)Δ EQ-5D ≤0.24: minimal effect; 0.24≤ Δ EQ-5D <0.31: satisfactory effect; Δ EQ-5D greater than or equal to (≥)0.31 points: pronounced effect.

  4. General Health Score as Assessed by EQ-5D VAS

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Positive Response on Health Quality Assessment of EQ-5D

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality. Positive response was defined as an increase of EQ-5D score by 0.1 or more i.e. it is a clinically significant increase.

  6. Change in General Health Assessed by VAS

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

    Participant-reported general health quality was assessed using an EQ-5D 100-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 100 mm) with 0=worst health state and 100=the best health state. The participants were asked to mark the line that corresponded to assessment of general health quality.

  7. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.

  8. Change in DAS28 Score From Baseline to Week 24

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

  9. Percentage of Patients With Varied Disease Activity Assessed Using DAS28 During Tocilizumab Treatment

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the ESR mm/hour, and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Disease activity: 0=remission (DAS28 less than [<] 2.6), I=low (DAS28 less than or equal to [≤]2.6 to <3.2), II=moderate (DAS28=3.2 to 5.1), III=high (DAS28 greater than [>]5.1).

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20), 50% (ACR50), and 70% (ACR70) Response

    Time frame: Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    ACR20/50/70 response: ≥20%, ≥50%, or ≥70% improvement, respectively, in swollen/tender joint count (66 joints assessed for swelling and 68 joints assessed for tenderness) and in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and acute phase response: C-reactive protein (CRP) or ESR.

  11. Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as no effect, good effect, and moderate effect, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score ≤3.2; moderate effect: change from baseline >1.2 with DAS28 score 3.2 to 5.1 or change from baseline >0.6 to <1.2 with DAS28 score <3.2; no effect: change from baseline ≤0.6 or change from baseline >0.6 and ≤1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1.

  12. C-Reactive Protein

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    CRP (milligrams/Liter) is a mediator of inflammation, acute phase protein.

  13. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    ESR (mm/hr) is used to determine the acute phase response.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Local Open-label Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to DMARDs When Adding Tocilizumab (TCZ)

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Oct 16, 2009
Registry last updated
Mar 29, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.