Tirzepatide
DrugAdministered SC
Other names: LY3298176
NCT Number: NCT04660643
This was a study of tirzepatide in participants with obesity or overweight. The main purpose was to learn more about how tirzepatide maintained body weight loss. The study had two phases: a lead-in phase in which all participants took tirzepatide and a treatment phase in which participants either continued tirzepatide or switched to placebo. The study lasted about 2 years (25 visits).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
CEDIC, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Administered SC
Other names: LY3298176
Administered SC
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
Least square (LS) mean was analysed by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with randomization + analysis country + sex + interactive web response system (IWRS) MTD at Week 36 + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 64
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with log(actual measurement/randomization) = log (randomization) + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with log(actual measurement/randomization) = log (randomization) + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
LS mean change was analysed by MMRM model with randomization + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + Weight Loss at Week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
The SF-36v2 acute form assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on 8 domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. The Physical-Functioning domain assesses limitations due to health "now" and consists of 10-items, each rated on a 3-point Likert scale. Scoring of the domain is norm-based and presented in the form of T-scores, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better levels of function. Range cannot be specified in norm-based scores.
LS mean was analysed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with randomization + analysis Country + sex + weight loss at Week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment (type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36), Week 88
The IWQOL Lite-CT consists of 20 items, assessing 2 primary domains of obesity related HRQoL: Physical (7 items) and Psychosocial (13 items). A 5-item subset of the Physical domain - the Physical Function composite - is also supported. Items in the Physical Function composite describe physical impacts related to general and specific physical activities. All items in the physical domain are rated on either a 5-point frequency ("never" to "always") scale or a 5-point truth ("not at all true" to "completely true") scale. Total score of IWQOL-Lite-CT composite ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life.
LS mean was analysed by ANCOVA model with randomization + analysis Country + sex + weight loss at Week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment (type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Week 88
Percentage of Participants Who Maintain at least 80% of the Body Weight Lost During the Open-Label Lead-In Period was analysed by Logistic regression model with missing value imputed by MMRM at week 88. Missing values were imputed by predictions using observed data in the efficacy analysis set from the same treatment group through an MMRM analysis model for post-baseline measures with Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + randomization + Treatment + Time + Treatment*Time as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to Week 88
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, ≥20% Body Weight Reduction from baseline was analysed by Logistic regression model with missing value imputed by MMRM at week 88. Missing values were imputed by predictions using observed data in the efficacy analysis set from the same treatment group through an MMRM analysis model for post-baseline measures with Baseline + Analysis Country + Sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + randomization + Treatment + Time + Treatment*Time as variables.
Time frame: Randomization (Week 36) to Week 88
Time to first occurrence of participants returning to >95% baseline weight for those who lost ≥5% during the open-label lead-in period.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + BMI at randomization (kg/m^2) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + body weight at randomization (kg) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + body weight at randomization (kg) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with log(actual measurement/baseline) = log (baseline) + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with log(actual measurement/baseline) = log (baseline) + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + weight loss at week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
LS mean was analysed by MMRM model with baseline + analysis country + sex + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + Weight Loss at Week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + treatment + time + treatment*time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
The SF-36v2 acute form assesses health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on 8 domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. The Physical-Functioning domain assesses limitations due to health "now" and consists of 10-items, each rated on a 3-point Likert scale. Scoring of the domain is norm-based and presented in the form of T-scores, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better levels of function. Range cannot be specified in norm-based scores.
LS mean was analysed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with randomization + analysis Country + sex + weight loss at Week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment (type III sum of squares) as variables.
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 88
The IWQOL Lite-CT consists of 20 items, assessing 2 primary domains of obesity related HRQoL: Physical (7 items) and Psychosocial (13 items). A 5-item subset of the Physical domain - the Physical Function composite - is also supported. Items in the Physical Function composite describe physical impacts related to general and specific physical activities. All items in the physical domain are rated on either a 5-point frequency ("never" to "always") scale or a 5-point truth ("not at all true" to "completely true") scale. Total score of IWQOL-Lite-CT composite ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better health-related quality of life.
LS mean was analysed by ANCOVA model with baseline + analysis Country + sex + weight loss at Week 36 (< 10%, >= 10%) + IWRS MTD at Week 36 + treatment (type III sum of squares) as variables.
Eli Lilly and Company
Industry
Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Once Weekly Versus Placebo for Maintenance of Weight Loss in Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Obesity or Are Overweight With Weight-Related Comorbidities: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (SURMOUNT-4)
Acronym: SURMOUNT-4
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04184622
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Pelham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05144737
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04634890
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT05056376
Behavior, Body Weight
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details