Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00131352

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee

This clinical study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients will be given 6 mL of hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) (or a phosphate buffered saline control), with a possible repeat treatment with Synvisc after the week 26 visit.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Hopital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The trial included an initial 26 week treatment with 6 mL of hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) (or a phosphate buffered saline control) followed by a 4 week repeat treatment of Synvisc.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with documented diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis (OA) of the target knee made at least 3 months prior to Screening,
  • Has radiographic evidence of OA in the tibio-femoral compartment of the target, knee with at least 1 definite osteophyte and a measureable joint space, as diagnosed by standard X-rays taken not longer than 3 months prior to Screening, and before any baseline assessment,
  • Has continued target knee pain despite conservative treatment (e.g. weight reduction, physical therapy, analgesics),
  • Has pain in the target knee as demonstrated by a score of 2 or 3 on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale Version 3.1 (WOMAC LK 3.1) A1 (Walking Pain) Subscale ,
  • Has a mean score of 1.5 to 3.5 on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale Version 3.1 (WOMAC LK 3.1) A (Pain) Subscale.
  • Inclusion Criteria for Repeat Phase: Must have no major safety concerns during the first course of treatment as assessed by the Investigator; Must have a WOMAC LK 3.1 A score of at least 1.

Exclusion criteria

  • Has modified Kellgren-Lawrence Numerical Grading System of grade IV in the patello-femoral compartment of the target knee confirmed by standard X-rays taken not longer than 3 months prior to Screening, and before any baseline assessment,
  • Has clinically apparent tense effusion of the target knee,
  • Has had viscosupplementation in any joint including the target knee within 9 months prior to Screening,
  • Has concomitant inflammatory disease or other condition that affects the joints (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic bone disease, psoriasis, gout, symptomatic chondrocalcinosis and active infection, etc.,)
  • Symptomatic OA of the contralateral knee or of either hip that is not responsive to paracetamol and requires other therapy,
  • Has related hypersensitivities to avian proteins and/or any components of hyaluronan-based injection devices,

Treatment and study plan

hylan G-F 20

Device

Single injection of 6 mL of hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc).

Other names: Synvisc-One

Phosphate buffered saline

Other

Single injection of 6 mL phosphate buffered saline.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Knee Pain Over the Course of the 26-week Initial Treatment Period As Measured by Participants Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale Version 3.1 (WOMAC LK 3.1) A (Pain) Subscale

    Time frame: Day 0, up to week 26

    The change from baseline over the course of the 26-week initial treatment period using participants' assessment of pain. Mean scores were used for baseline (day 0) and for all visits up to week 26 (weeks 4, 8, 12, 18 and 26). The WOMAC Pain Subscale has a score range of 0-4, where 0=no pain and 4=extreme pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Knee Pain at Week 26 As Measured by Participants Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale Version 3.1 (WOMAC LK 3.1) A (Pain) Subscale

    Time frame: Day 0, Week 26

    The change from baseline to week 26 using participants' assessment of pain. The WOMAC Pain Subscale has a score range of 0-4, where 0=no pain and 4=extreme pain.

  2. Participants Level of Pain While Walking at Week 26 As Measured by Participants Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale Version 3.1 (WOMAC LK 3.1) A1 (Walking Pain) Subscale

    Time frame: Week 26

    Participants categorized the pain they felt while walking using the WOMAC LK 3.1) A1 (Walking Pain) Subscale. The scale rates pain as none, mild, moderate, severe and extreme.

  3. Change From Baseline Over the Course of the 26-week Initial Treatment Period in Physical Function Measured by Participants Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale (WOMAC LK Version 3.1) C (Function) Subscale

    Time frame: Day 0, up to week 26

    The change from baseline over the course of the 26-week initial treatment period using participants' assessment of physical function. Mean scores were used for baseline (day 0) and for all visits up to week 26 (weeks 4, 8, 12, 18 and 26). The WOMAC Function Subscale has a score range of 0-4 to assess the degree of difficulty completing tasks within the past 48 hours, where 0=no difficulty and 4=extreme difficulty.

  4. Change From Baseline at Week 26 in Physical Function Measured by Participants Using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Likert Scale (WOMAC LK Version 3.1) C (Function) Subscale

    Time frame: Day 0, Week 26

    The change from baseline to week 26 using participants' assessment of physical function. The WOMAC Function Subscale has a score range of 0-4 to assess the degree of difficulty completing tasks within the past 48 hours, where 0=no difficulty and 4=extreme difficulty.

  5. Participant Global Assessment (PTGA) of the Target Knee Osteoarthritis Condition at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    The Participant Global Assessment (PTGA) was used by participants to rate their osteoarthritis (OA). PTGA uses 5 scoring levels: Very well=0, Well=1, Fair=2, Poor=3, Very poor=4.

  6. Clinical Observer Global Assessment (COGA) of the Target Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) Condition at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    The Blinded Clinical Observer gave a global assessment (COGA) of the target knee OA. COGA uses 5 scoring levels: Very well=0, Well=1, Fair=2, Poor=3, Very poor=4.

  7. Participants Classified as Responders Per the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Criteria at Week 26

    Time frame: Week 26

    Participants were classified as a positive responder if at least one of the following two conditions were met:

    • A significant improvement in either the pain (WOMAC A) or physical function (WOMAC C) subscales, defined as both a ≥ 50% improvement from Baseline and an absolute change from Baseline of ≥ 20 normalised units (NU), OR
    • Improvement in at least 2 of 3 subscales - pain (WOMAC A), physical function (WOMAC C) or Participant Global Assessment (PTGA). Improvement for all three scales is defined as ≥ 20% improvement from Baseline and an absolute change from Baseline of ≥ 10 NU

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Genzyme, a Sanofi Company

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-Centre, Parallel, Double-Blind, Blinded Evaluator, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of 6 mL of Synvisc in Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Aug 18, 2005
Registry last updated
Apr 3, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.