Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01485770

A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of ADX-N05 in the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ADX-N05 compared to placebo in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Pulmonary Associates, Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of narcolepsy
  • Good general health
  • Willing and able to comply with the study design and schedule and other requirements

Exclusion criteria

  • If female, pregnant or lactating
  • Customary bedtime later than midnight
  • History of significant medical condition, behavioral or psychiatric disorder (including suicidal ideation), or surgical history
  • Any other clinically relevant medical, behavioral or psychiatric disorder other than narcolepsy that is associated with excessive sleepiness
  • History of significant cardiovascular disease
  • Body mass index >34
  • Excessive caffeine use - > 600 mg/day of caffeine or > 6 cups of coffee/day
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within the past two years
  • Nicotine dependence that has an affect on sleep

Treatment and study plan

ADX-N05

Drug

150 mg once a day for seven days followed by 300 mg once a day for seven days

Placebo

Drug

Placebo to match ADX-N05 once a day for 2 consecutive weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Average Sleep Latency Time (in Minutes) as Determined From the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Following Two Weeks of Treatment With ADX-N05 vs. Two Weeks of Treatment With Placebo

    Time frame: Baseline up to 2 weeks post-dose.

    The MWT is a validated objective measure of the ability to stay awake for a defined period of time. The change from baseline in the mean sleep latency from the MWT was the average of sleep latency from the four trials of the MWT.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During Weeks 1 and 3

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 3 post-dose.

    The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.

  2. Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score During Weeks 2 and 4

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 4 post-dose.

    The ESS is a questionnaire intended to measure daytime sleepiness. In this test, participants answer questions with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the 7 days prior to the assessment while performing eight common, non-stimulating activities. The ESS total score range is 1 to 24. Each activity is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from a minimum of "would never doze" to a maximum of "a high chance of dozing." Thus, the ESS scale range is as follows: 0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing; 0 indicates a better outcome, and 3 indicates a worse outcome. A negative mean change value indicates a decrease in score from baseline and an improvement in daytime sleepiness.

  3. Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores During Weeks 1 and 3

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 3 post-dose.

    The CGI-C scale was completed at Week 1 through 4 visits. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of participants experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the two weeks of each of the treatment periods. The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.

  4. Number of Participants With Improved Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) Scores During Weeks 2 and 4

    Time frame: Week 2 and Week 4 post-dose.

    The CGI-C scale was completed at Week 1 through 4 visits. The participant was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from a minimum of "Very much improved" to a maximum of "Very much worse." The proportion of participants experiencing at least minimal improvement on the CGI-C was calculated and summarized for each of the two weeks of each of the treatment periods. The CGI-C scale consists of the following ratings: 1-Very Much improved, 2-Much improved, 3-Minimally improved, 4-No change, 5-Minimally worse, 6-Much worse, 7-Very much worse; a rating of 1 indicates a better outcome, and a rating of 7 indicates a worse outcome. Improvement was defined as a CGI-rating of 1, 2, or 3.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Four-week, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Cross-over Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ADX-N05 in the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Dec 6, 2011
Registry last updated
Jul 6, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.