Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02383732

A Study of the Elopement Prevention and Safety Training Program

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of the Elopement Prevention Safety (EPST) program in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who have engaged in eloping. This is a program created by the Behavior Treatment Clinics to help caregivers come up with a safety plan to prevent their children from running away or wandering off.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

4 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Marcus Autism Center

Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States

About this study

A large number of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have a current or past history of elopement. For parents of a child with ASD, having their child go missing is potentially dangerous and far more likely compared to typically developing children. This behavior interferes with household routines, engenders vigilance, and restricts the family's participation in their community. Such restrictions contribute to the family's isolation and hinders development of community supports. Elopement can result in injuries and deaths of children with ASD.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females, ages 4 to 12 inclusive
  • Diagnosis of ASD as determined by clinical interview and supported by standardized measures (i.e., Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2, Vineland, Stanford-Binet V)
  • Engages in elopement in the form of bolting or wandering, as determined by structured interview
  • A caregiver who expresses a willingness to participate in treatment and complete baseline/outcome assessments.

Exclusion criteria

  • Unmanaged psychopathology or problem behavior other than elopement that warrants immediate clinical care, determined by clinical interview and Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC)
  • Child and family currently in therapy that is likely to be redundant with the treatment program or interfere with proposed treatment
  • Presence of both of the types of elopement under investigation (i.e., both bolting and wandering).

Treatment and study plan

Universal Safety Measures Module (All participants)

Behavioral

During the first session, the therapist conducts a home safety evaluation. During the second visit the therapist provides the caregiver with an individualized Elopement Prevention & Safety Plan (EPSP) based upon the results of the evaluation. The remainder of the session is spent helping caregivers make plans to implement the EPSP to reduce the risk of elopement or lessen the risk of harm to the child if they do successfully elope.

Proximity Training Module (Bolting Prevention Participants)

Behavioral

During the first session a functional behavioral assessment (FBA) of bolting is conducted to identify the motivator(s) that evoke bolting. Caregivers identify a setting that is most problematic because it contains the item/activity that most frequently serves as a motivator for elopement. In the next session, caregivers are taught to identify effective alternative reinforcers. In subsequent sessions, antecedent and consequence based strategies are employed to reduce motivation for elopement and reinforce remaining within the designated proximity of a caregiver for increasing durations.

Check-In Training Module (Wandering Prevention Participants)

Behavioral

This module employs behavioral strategies to teach a child to check in with a caregiver at frequent fixed intervals during periods of low supervision. Delivering potent reinforcement for checking in counteracts any motivation to wander. Furthermore, if the child does wander caregivers become aware of it immediately because they failed to check in. During the first session caregivers are taught to identify effective reinforcers. A vibrating alarm that can be carried in a participating child's pocket serves as a prompt to seek out a caregiver and check-in. Participants receive access to a previously identified and individualized reinforcer for checking-in with the caregiver.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of intervention, assessed by change in severity on Clinical Global Impression for Severity (CGI-S)

    Time frame: Post-intervention (12-14 weeks)

    An independent evaluator (IE) will conduct a parent target problem survey to help caregivers estimate the frequency of elopement as well as its impact on the family. From this description, the IE (who will be blind to treatment assignment) will generate a brief narrative describing the participant's elopement. This narrative will be used by the IE to rate the overall severity on the 7-point Clinical Global Impression for Severity (CGI-S). Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scale is a clinician's assessment of patient's severity of illness. The score ranges from 1 = normal, not at all ill to 7 = among the most extremely ill patients

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in elopement behavior

    Time frame: Post-intervention (12-14 weeks)

    Number of times a subject exhibits bolting and wandering at baseline and post-intervention. Change in elopement will be subtracting the number of bolting and wandering events from post-intervention and baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Emory University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Feasibility Study of the Elopement Prevention and Safety Training Program

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 9, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.