paclitaxel
Drug175 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
NCT Number: NCT03635489
This multicenter, double-blind, 2-arm, randomized study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel and caboplatin compared with placebo plus paclitaxel and caboplatin in Chinese participants with newly diagnosed, previously untreated Stage III or Stage IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Participants whose disease has not progressed after six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin with either bevacizumab or placebo will continue treatment with either bevacizumab or placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 22 cycles, whichever occurs first.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
175 mg/m^2 IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
15 mg/kg IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Other names: Avastin
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 6 mg/ml/min on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Placebo matched to bevacizumab IV infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
Time frame: Randomization up to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: Randomization up to to death from any cause (up to approximately 54.1 months)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Time frame: Randomization up to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 24 months)
ORR was defined as the proportion of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v.1.1.
Time frame: From the date of first occurrence of a complete or partial response until disease progression or death from any cause (up to approximately 24 months)
DOR was defined as the time from when response (CR or PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression,as assessed by the Investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had a objective response of CR or PR.
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported abdominal pain or bloating was defined as a ≥10-point decrease from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline symptom scale score on each of two items from the Abdominal/Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported abdominal pain or bloating was defined as a ≥10-point decrease from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline symptom scale score on each of two items from the Abdominal/Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a >10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a >10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a >10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a >10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization to the end of treatment/discontinuation (up to approximately 70 weeks), and during follow-up period (up to approximately 24 months)
A clinically meaningful improvement in patient-reported function and HRQoL was defined as a >10-point increase from the linearly transformed 0-100 point baseline scale score on each of the four functional (physical, role, emotional, social) scales and global health status/HRQoL scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30).
Time frame: From randomization up to 90 days after last dose of study treatment or until initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to approximately 76 weeks)
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Phase III Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Plus Placebo Versus Carboplatin Paclitaxel Plus Concurrent and Extended Bevacizumab in Chinese Women With Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated, Stage III or Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07648745
Adnexal Diseases, Bowel Obstruction
Manchester, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01220154
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Hilliard, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03159572
Adnexal Diseases, Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
Niigata, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT04227522
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell
Aachen, Germany
View Trial Details