Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03263065

A Study of the Effect of Bran, Psyllium and Nopal on Intestinal Water Content Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

This study will compare 3 food products (bran, psyllium and nopal) on intestinal water content measured via MRI.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Nottingham

Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom

About this study

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

The role of dietary fibre in human health is a topic of both debate and research. Interpreting evidence is complicated by changes in the definition of fibre. In the UK the Scientific Advisory Committee for Nutrition has recently proposed a definition of "all carbohydrates that are neither digested nor absorbed in the small intestine and have a degree of polymerisation of three or more monomeric units, plus lignin". They have also called for further research into the physiological effects of fibre of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

The Nottingham GI MRI group has been at the forefront of elucidating the effects of poorly digested carbohydrates on gastrointestinal physiology. The investigators have published techniques to measure free water in the small bowel and assessment of the physical form of chyme in the colon using MR relaxometry. This includes the demonstration that fructose ingestion on its own leads to increased free water in the small bowel compared to co-ingestion with glucose.

Bran is often confused with dietary fibre. Although it contains fibre, the term actually refers to the outer husk of seeds and grains. It has been shown to accelerate oro-caecal transit (OCT) with scintigraphy. Bran can also be shown to increase small bowel water content, possibly by mechanical stimulation, one of the most powerful stimuli for small intestinal secretion, which may be a mechanism to prevent blockage. In the past bran's high fibre content led to the hypothesis that its effect derived from holding water in the lumen but a comparison study of 17 different fibres found an inverse relationship between their water-holding properties and effect on faecal weight, with bran holding the least water but inducing the largest weight changes. Rather, weight change appeared to relate to the amount of undigested fibre present in the faeces and the associated changes in bacterial numbers, which account for most of dry stool weight.

In contrast, psyllium husk contains a fibre that binds water effectively. On this basis it has been used as a laxative for thousands of years. In fact, there is little evidence that psyllium accelerates whole gut transit time as might be expected of a laxative. Work within the investigating group has shown that psyllium increases water in both the small bowel and the faeces, leading to softer, looser stool.

Nopal is a Mexican dietary product derived from cactus. It contains a different mix of fibre, 2/3rds of which is insoluble like bran fibre and 1/3rd soluble like psyllium. It is the subject of several health claims. The investigating group has recently been awarded a grant by the Newton Fund, through the Medical Research council, to study its effects on gut function. The aim of the Newton Fund is to stimulate collaborative research with middle-income countries such as Mexico. Part of the project plan is to invite a Mexican radiologist, Dr Alfonso Gil-Valadez, to Nottingham to learn about the MRI techniques used by our group.

TRIAL OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to gather pilot data on the effect of Nopal on intestinal water content, in comparison to bran and psyllium.

Objective

The primary objective is to gather pilot data on the change from baseline in small bowel water content in healthy volunteers after a meal containing nopal, in comparison to meals containing psyllium or bran.

Secondary Objectives

Secondary objectives will be to gather pilot data on the effects of the fibre-containing meals on the physical form of colonic chyme, colonic volume and breath markers of fermentation.

Hypotheses

The test meals will lead to differences in post-prandial water in the small bowel.

The test meals will lead to differences in the post-prandial volume and physical composition of chyme in the colon.

The test meals will not lead to change in breath markers of fermentation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 or older
  • Able to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy declared by candidate
  • History declared by the candidate of pre-existing gastrointestinal disorder that may affect bowel function
  • A positive diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome based on the Rome IV criteria questionnaire
  • Reported history of previous resection of the oesophagus, stomach or intestine (excluding appendix)
  • Intestinal stoma
  • Any medical condition making participation potentially compromising participation in the study e.g. diabetes mellitus, respiratory disease limiting ability to lie in the scanner, known allergy to one of the food products
  • Contraindications for MRI scanning i.e. metallic implants, pacemakers, history of metallic foreign body in eye(s) and penetrating eye injury
  • Will not agree to dietary restrictions required in 24 hours before each MRI study day
  • Unable to stop drugs known to alter GI motility including mebeverine, opiates, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phenothiazines, benzodiazepines, calcium channel antagonists for the duration of the study (Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and low dose tricyclic antidepressants will be recorded but will not be an exclusion criteria)
  • Inability to lie flat or exceed scanner limits of weight <120kg
  • Poor understanding of English language
  • Participation in night shift work the week prior to the study day. Night work is defined as working between midnight and 6.00 AM
  • Participation in any medical trials for the past 3 months
  • Anyone who in the opinion of the investigator is unlikely to be able to comply with the protocol e.g. cognitive dysfunction, chaotic lifestyle related to substance abuse

Treatment and study plan

Bran

Dietary Supplement

220g rice pudding meal with raspberry jam with added bran flakes

Nopal

Dietary Supplement

220g rice pudding meal with raspberry jam with added nopal flakes

Psyllium

Dietary Supplement

220g rice pudding meal with raspberry jam with added psyllium flakes

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from the baseline in T1 relaxation time (ms) of the chyme in the ascending colon

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post ingestion, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post ingestion

    measured by MRI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from the baseline in small bowel water content (mL)

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post ingestion, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post ingestion

    measured by MRI

  2. Change from the baseline in colonic volume in mL

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post ingestion, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post ingestion

    measured by MRI

  3. Change from the baseline of breath hydrogen and methane (ppm)

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post ingestion, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post ingestion

    measured using GastroCHeck

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Nottingham

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Pilot Participant-blind Study of the Effect of Bran, Psyllium and Nopal on Intestinal Water Content Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Acronym: NOPAL

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Aug 28, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 17, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.