Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, China
NCT Number: NCT05713110
A phase II clinical study of tazemetostat combined with HMPL-689 in patients with R/R lymphoma. The study includes 2 phases: dose escalation phase (phase IIa) and expansion phase (phase IIb).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Shanghai, China
Dose Escalation Phase (Phase IIa ):Including 10-20 patients for dose escalation, the enrollment will continue until about 10 patients in the dose group with response, as to determine Recommended Phase II dose (RP2D).
Dose Expansion Phase (Phase IIb):Multiple expansion cohorts will be set up according to different tumor types, and about 15-20 patients will be enrolled in each cohort to further observe the anti-tumor effect of Tazemetostat combined with HMPL-689 in different pathological types of R/R lymphoma.
This study is expected to enroll 85-140 patients total in Phase IIa and phase IIb.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Criteria: Inclusion Criteria:
Cohort 2 (FL) patients with histologically confirmed R/R FL (Grade 1, 2, 3a)
Cohort 3 (MCL): Patients with R/R MCL who had prior therapies
Cohort 4 (PTCL): Patients with histologically confirmed R/R PTCL who have failed or cannot tolerate standard therapy
Exclusion criteria
Dose Escalation Phase (Phase IIa):
Tazemetostat (800 mg BID orally) in a therapeutic cycle of 28 days;
Dose Expansion Phase (Phase IIb):
Tazemetostat (800 mg BID orally) in a therapeutic cycle of 28 days
Dose Escalation Phase (Phase IIa):
HMPL-689:20 mg and 30 mg, QD orally in a therapeutic cycle of 28 days.
Dose Expansion Phase (Phase IIb):
HMPL-689 (RP2D) in a therapeutic cycle of 28 days
Time frame: from Cycle 1 Day 1 up to Cycle 1 Day 28 (each cycle is 28 days)
Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) During the DLT Observation Period
Time frame: from Cycle 1 Day 1 to PFS (each cycle is 28 days)
Percentage of patients with Complete Response(CR) or Partial Response(PR) as the best response evaluated in accordance with Lugano2014
Time frame: from Cycle 1 Day 1 to PFS (each cycle is 28 days)
the proportion of patients with CR or PR or stable disease (SD) as the best response with Lugano2014
Time frame: from Cycle 1 Day 1 to PFS (each cycle is 28 days)
as the time from the first appearance of CR or PR to PD or death for any reason (whichever comes first), in the patients with objective response with Lugano2014)
Time frame: from Cycle 1 Day 1 to PFS (each cycle is 28 days)
the proportion of patients with CR or PR or stable disease (SD) as the best response with Lugano2014
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
Percentage of patients with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as the best response evaluated in accordance with Lugano 2014
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
Percentage of patients with Complete Response (CR) as the best response evaluated in accordance with Lugano 2014
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
the proportion of patients with CR or PR or stable disease (SD) as the best response
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
as the time from the first appearance of CR or PR to PD or death for any reason (whichever comes first), in the patients with objective response
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
the time from the first dose of Tazemetostat in combination with HMPL-689 to the first objective response
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
time from the first dose of study treatment to PD or death for any reason, whichever comes first
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
time from the first dose of study treatment to death for any reason
time from the first dose of study treatment to death for any reason
Time frame: From baseline to final assessment at end of safety follow-up visit(through study completion, an average of 2 years)
Incidence, severity, and causality to study drug of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) as determined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (NCI-CTCAE 5.0)
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1: predose of first administration (PoFA); 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. C1D15: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. C1D2, C1D16, C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1: PoFA
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration that a drug achieves in a test area of the body after the drug has been administered. Plasma concentration-time profiles of tazemetostat and EPZ-6930 will be plotted using non-compartmental analysis and will be analyzed to determine Cmax. Cmax will be summarized as the geomean and geomean CV% for all participants.
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1: predose of first administration (PoFA); 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. C1D15: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. C1D2, C1D16, C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1: PoFA
Tmax is defined as the time from dosing to reach the maximum observed concentration a drug achieves in a specified compartment or test area of the body after the drug has been administered. Plasma concentration-time profiles of tazemetostat and EPZ-6930 will be plotted using non-compartmental analysis and will be analyzed to determine Tmax. Tmax will be summarized as the median (min, max) for all participants.
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. C1D15: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose.
AUC represents the total drug exposure over a defined period of time. AUC will be calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. Plasma concentrations of tazemetostat and EPZ-6930 will be analyzed using a non-compartmental analysis approach to determine individual participant estimates of AUC. AUC will be summarized as the geomean and geomean CV% for all participants
Time frame: C1D15, C1D16, C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1: PoFA
Cmin is defined as the minimum observed concentration at steady-state during one dosing interval. Cmin will be summarized as the geomean and geomean CV% for all participants.
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1: predose of first administration (PoFA); 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 (C1D2, PoFA) hours postdose. C1D15: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 (C1D16, PoFA) hours postdose. C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1: PoFA
Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration that a drug achieves in a test area of the body after the drug has been administered. Plasma concentration-time profiles of HMPL-689 will be plotted using non-compartmental analysis and will be analyzed to determine Cmax. Cmax will be summarized as the geomean and geomean CV% for all participants.
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1: predose of first administration (PoFA); 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 (C1D2, PoFA) hours postdose. C1D15: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 (C1D16, PoFA) hours postdose. C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1: PoFA
Tmax is defined as the time from dosing to reach the maximum observed concentration a drug achieves in a specified compartment or test area of the body after the drug has been administered. Plasma concentration-time profiles of HMPL-689 will be plotted using non-compartmental analysis and will be analyzed to determine Tmax. Tmax will be summarized as the median (min, max) for all participants
Time frame: Cycle (C) 1, Day (D) 1: predose of first administration (PoFA); 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 (C1D2, PoFA) hours postdose. C1D15: PoFA; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 (C1D16, PoFA) hours postdose
AUC represents the total drug exposure over a defined period of time. AUC will be calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. Plasma concentrations of HMPL-689 will be analyzed using a non-compartmental analysis approach to determine individual participant estimates of AUC. AUC will be summarized as the geomean and geomean CV% for all participants.
Time frame: C1D15, C1D16, C2D1, C3D1 and C4D1: PoFA
Cmin is defined as the minimum observed concentration at steady-state during one dosing interval. Cmin will be summarized as the geomean and geomean CV% for all participants
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
The efficacy of participants as assessed by Lugano2014 from different dose groups, to assess the correlation of efficacy and PK of tazemetostat and HMPL-689
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0 from different dose groups, to assess the correlation of safety and PK of tazemetostat and HMPL-689
Hutchmed
Industry
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Tazemetostat in Combination With HMPL-689 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05189093
Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases, Immune System Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02259010
Advanced Solid Tumors, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02214147
Advanced Solid Tumors, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06756321
Hematologic Diseases, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Nantong, Jiangsu, China
View Trial Details