TAK-771
DrugIntervention description; Immune Globulin Infusion (IGI) 10% and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)
Other names: Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase
NCT Number: NCT05084053
The main aim of the study is to check for side effects from TAK-771, and to check how well TAK-771 controls symptoms in Japanese participants with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN)
The participants will be treated with TAK-771 for 45 months as a maximum.
There will be many clinic visits. The number of visits will depend on the infusion cycles of study drug (every 2, 3, or 4 weeks).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Aichi-ken, Japan
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CIDP patients
CIDP/MMN Patients
(Participants with clinically diagnosed diabetes mellitus who do not have diabetic peripheral neuropathy and who have adequate glycemic control with hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level of <7.5% at screening will be eligible for the study, provided the electrodiagnostic criteria are consistent with the diagnosis of a definite or probable CIDP consistent with the EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria and the participant agrees to maintain adequate glycemic control.)
(Clinically non-significant skin reactions, as per the investigator's and the sponsor medical monitor's discretion, do not meet this exclusion criterion. Clinically non-significant skin reactions may include local reactions to injection such as injection site's itching, redness, erythema, or swelling.)
Intervention description; Immune Globulin Infusion (IGI) 10% and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase (rHuPH20)
Other names: Immune Globulin Infusion 10% (Human) with Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months
Relapse was defined as worsening of functional disability defined as an increase of >=1 point relative to the pre-subcutaneous (pre-SC) treatment baseline score in adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score. The INCAT disability scale was the most widely used assessment tool to measure the functional activity level of participants with CIDP. The INCAT disability scale consisted of upper and lower extremity components, with a maximum of 5 points for the upper extremities (arm disability) and a maximum of 5 points for the lower extremities (leg disability), which were summed for an overall INCAT disability score ranging from 0 to 10 points, where 0 was normal and 10 was severely incapacitated. An adjusted INCAT disability score was the same as the INCAT disability score, with the only exception in the exclusion of changes from 0 (normal) to 1 (minor symptoms) (or vice versa) in upper limb function.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months
The Martin Vigorimeter was used to assess grip strength in both hands. The instrument consisted of a compressible rubber ball that was connected to a manometer. When the rubber ball was squeezed, the force of compression was measured in kilopascal (kPa) ranging from 0 to 160 kPa.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of investigational product (IP). TEAEs caused in Epoch 1 were defined as AEs that occurred on or after the start of study drug administration, and before the first dose of IP in Epoch 2 (6 months). TEAEs caused in Epoch 2 (6 months) were defined as AEs that began during or after administration of the first dose of IP in Epoch 2 (6 months).
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
SAEs were defined as any untoward clinical manifestation of signs, symptoms, outcomes (related to IP or not) at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient/prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity, congenital abnormality/birth defect, or any other important medical event.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Related SAES and TEAEs: that followed a reasonable temporal sequence from administration of a drug (including the course after withdrawal of the drug), or for which possible involvement of the drug cannot be ruled out, although factors other than the drug, such as underlying diseases, complications, concomitant medications and concurrent treatments, may also be responsible.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Adverse reactions plus suspected ARs were defined as TEAEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to IP administration, or for which the causality was indeterminate or missing, or that began during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Infusion associated SAEs and/or TEAEs were defined as SAEs and/or TEAEs considered to be "infusion-related reactions" by investigators.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Related SAES and TEAEs: that followed a reasonable temporal sequence from administration of a drug (including the course after withdrawal of the drug), or for which possible involvement of the drug cannot be ruled out, although factors other than the drug, such as underlying diseases, complications, concomitant medications and concurrent treatments, may also be responsible. SAEs and TEAEs associated with infusions were the events considered to be "infusion-related reactions" by investigators.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
TEAEs were defined as adverse events that occurred during or after administration of the first dose of IP. TEAEs caused in Epoch 1 were defined as AEs that occurred on or after the start of study drug administration, and before the first dose of IP in Epoch 2 (6 months). TEAEs caused in Epoch 2 (6 months) were defined as AEs that began during or after administration of the first dose of IP in Epoch 2 (6 months). TEAEs temporally associated with infusions defined as AEs occurring during or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Adverse reactions plus suspected ARs were defined as TEAEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to IP administration, or for which the causality was indeterminate or missing, or that began during infusion of IP or within 72 hours following the end of IP infusion. AEs temporally associated with infusions are defined as AEs occurring during or within 72 hours after completion of an infusion.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Any TEAEs other than local TEAEs were considered a systemic TEAE. Infusion associated TEAEs were defined as TEAE considered to be "infusion-related reactions" by investigators.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Any reaction with the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) high-level group term (HLGT) of "Administration site reactions" were considered a local infusion site reaction (local TEAE). In addition, any TEAE with Injection Site Reaction Flag = "Yes" was considered a local TEAE. Infusion associated reaction were defined as event considered to be "infusion-related reactions" by investigators.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Number of infusions for which the infusion rate was reduced and/or the infusion was interrupted or stopped due to intolerability and/or AEs were reported.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Plasma samples for the detection of anti-rHuPH20 binding and neutralizing antibodies were collected. Participants were monitored for the formation of anti-rHuPH20 antibodies using validated anti-rHuPH20 antibody detection assay (also known as the Screening and Confirmatory Binding Assay). Positive antibodies were defined as participants who had anti rHuPH20 antibody titer greater than or equal to (>=) 1:160 at least one time during treatment.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline until end of Epoch 1 or relapse (up to 6 months)
Clinical Worsening of CIDP was defined as a >=8 kPa decrease in hand grip strength in the more affected hand OR >=4 points decrease in Rasch Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) relative to the pre-SC treatment baseline score at 2 consecutive time points. Hand grip strength was measured using the Martin vigorimeter by quantifying air pressure. The R-ODS was a participant self-reported, linearly-weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture activity and social participation limitations in participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. R-ODS was comprised of 24 items that rate participant's functioning related to a variety of everyday tasks at moment of completion on a scale of 0 to 2 (where 0 indicates it is not possible for the respondent to perform the task and 2 means that task can be performed without difficulty). Total scores range from 0 to 48 and higher scores indicate greater ability to perform daily and social tasks.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months; Epoch 2: Up to 6 months post-Epoch 1
Time to relapse was defined as time from the date of the first SC administration of TAK-771 in Epoch 1 or 2 to the date of relapse.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months
The R-ODS was a participant self-reported, linearly-weighted overall disability scale that was specifically designed to capture activity and social participation limitations in participants with immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies including CIDP. R-ODS was comprised of 24 items that rate participant's functioning related to a variety of everyday tasks at moment of completion on a scale of 0 to 2 (where 0 indicates it is not possible for the respondent to perform the task and 2 means that task can be performed without difficulty). Total scores range from 0 to 48 and higher scores indicate greater ability to perform daily and social tasks.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months
The Martin Vigorimeter was used to assess grip strength in both hands. The instrument consisted of a compressible rubber ball that was connected to a manometer. When the rubber ball was squeezed, the force of compression was measured in kPa ranging from 0 to 160 kPa. Average of grip strength was defined as an average of the two maximum values: maximum of the 3 measurements in the more affected hand and the maximum of the 3 measurements in the less affected hand.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months
The MRC sum score served as a measure of muscle strength. The following muscles on each side of the body were examined and the strength of each muscle was rated according to the MRC scale: deltoids, biceps, wrist extensors, iliopsoas, quadriceps, and anterior tibialis. The MRC scale ranged from 0 to 5, where: 0 = no visible contraction; 1 = visible contraction without movement of the limb; 2 = movement of the limb but not against gravity; 3 = movement against gravity over (almost) the full range; 4 = movement against gravity and resistance; and 5 = normal. All scores from both left and right side of the body were summed to obtain the total MRC sum score. The total MRC sum score ranged from 0 (paralysis) to 60 (normal strength) with higher score indication normal strength.
Time frame: Epoch 1: Baseline up to 6 months
GNDS was a questionnaire which consisted of 12 separate categories (4 to 8 questions per category). The categories included: cognition, mood, vision, speech, swallowing, upper limb function, lower limb function, bladder function, bowel function, sexual function, fatigue, and others. In the current study, only 2 categories; upper limb function and the lower limb function was used for assessment of the disability of participants with MMN. The severity of each subscale (including upper limb and lower limb) was graded from 0 (normal function) to 5 (total loss of function) based according to severity and impact on the individual. The total GNDS score was the sum of the 12 separate scores ranging between 0 and 60 with higher scores indicating loss of function.
Takeda
Industry
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of TAK-771 for the Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy (MMN) in Japanese Subjects
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03861481
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05363358
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04051944
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03864185
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Nagoya, Aich, Japan
View Trial Details