TAK-019
BiologicalTAK-019 intramuscular injection
NCT Number: NCT04712110
TAK-019 is a vaccine in development to protect people against Covid-19. The main aims of the study are to learn if TAK-019 can protect people from Covid-19 and to check for side effects from TAK-019.
At the first visit, the study doctor will check if each person can take part. Those who can take part will be chosen for 1 of 2 treatments by chance. Participants will either receive an injection of TAK-019 or a placebo in their arm. In this study, a placebo will look like the TAK-019 vaccine but will not have any medicine in it. 3 times as many participants will receive TAK-019 than placebo. Participants will receive 2 injections of TAK-019 or placebo, 21 days apart.
Participants will be asked to record their temperature and any medical problems in an electronic diary for up to 7 days after each injection.
During the study, participants will visit the clinic for regular check-ups, blood tests, and sometimes for nose swab samples. When all participants have attended a clinic visit 28 days after their 2nd injection, the study sponsor (Takeda) will check how many participants have made enough antibodies to protect them against Covid-19.
The participants will stay in the study for up to 12 months after they have had their 2nd injection. During this time, the study doctors will continue to check how many participants have made enough antibodies to protect them against Covid-19. Also, they will check if participants have any more side effects from TAK-019 or the placebo.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Sumida Hospital, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan
The drug being tested in this study is called TAK-019. TAK-019 is being tested to prevent infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study will look at the evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of 2 doses of TAK-019 by intramuscular (IM) injection 21 days apart in healthy Japanese male and female adults.
The study will enroll approximately 200 healthy volunteers. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups-which will remain undisclosed to the participant and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need):
All participants will be asked to take intramuscular injection in the upper arm twice throughout the study.
This multi-center trial will be conducted in Japan. The overall time to participate in this study is 12 months from the second vaccination (totally 387 days). Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic and will be contacted by telephone or a final visit after the last vaccination for a follow-up assessment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
TAK-019 intramuscular injection
Placebo intramuscular injection
Time frame: Up to Day 7 (6 subsequent days after first vaccination on Day 1)
Solicited local AEs were pre-defined local (at the injection site) AEs for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in their diary for six subsequent days following first vaccination. Solicited local AEs included injection site pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration, and swelling.
Time frame: Up to Day 28 (6 subsequent days after second vaccination on Day 22)
Solicited local AEs were pre-defined local (at the injection site) AEs for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in their diary for six subsequent days following second vaccination. Solicited local AEs included injection site pain, tenderness, erythema/redness, induration, and swelling.
Time frame: Up to Day 7 (6 subsequent days after first vaccination on Day 1)
Solicited systemic AEs were pre-defined AEs for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in their diary for six subsequent days following first vaccination. Solicited systemic AEs included fever, fatigue, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea/vomiting and headache.
Time frame: Up to Day 28 (6 subsequent days after second vaccination on Day 22)
Solicited systemic AEs were pre-defined AEs for which participants were specifically questioned and which were noted by participants in their diary for six subsequent days following second vaccination. Solicited systemic AEs included fever, fatigue, malaise, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea/vomiting and headache.
Time frame: Up to Day 21 (20 days after first vaccination on Day 1)
Unsolicited AEs were all AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary.
Time frame: Up to Day 49 (27 days after second vaccination on Day 22)
Unsolicited AEs were all AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 50
Only unsolicited SAEs data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this outcome measure (OM) and solicited SAE was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited SAEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with unsolicited SAEs until Day 50 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 50
AESIs were defined as AEs that were specifically highlighted to the Investigator. Only unsolicited AESI data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited AESI was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited AESIs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with unsolicited AESIs until Day 50 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 50
MAAEs are defined as AEs leading to an unscheduled visit to or by a healthcare professional including visits to an emergency department, but not fulfilling seriousness criteria. Only unsolicited MAAEs data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited MAAE was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited MAAEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with unsolicited MAAEs until Day 50 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 22
Only any unsolicited AE leading to discontinuation of vaccination data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited AE leading to discontinuation of vaccination was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited AEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with any unsolicited AE leading to discontinuation of vaccination until Day 22 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 50
Only any unsolicited AE leading to participant's withdrawal from the trial data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited AE leading to participant's withdrawal from the trial was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited AEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with any unsolicited AE leading to participant's withdrawal from the trial until Day 50 were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 50
Time frame: At Day 36
GMT was the immunogenicity outcome expressed as reciprocal antibody titer with average for each group. Titer values was measured as below lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed to a value that was half of the LLOQ. LLOQ was equal to 200. Here, ELISA is Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Time frame: At Day 36
GMFR was calculated as the ratio of the post-vaccination titer level to the baseline titer level. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Day 36
SCR was defined as percentage of participants with 4-fold or more rises in titer if naive at baseline OR percentage of participants with 2-fold or more rises in titer if seropositive at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Day 36
SRR was defined as percentage of participants with greater than or equal to (>=) 95 percentile in titer at Baseline for all participants. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 387
Only unsolicited SAEs data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited SAE was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited SAEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with unsolicited SAEs throughout the trial were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 387
AESIs were defined as AEs that were specifically highlighted to the Investigator. Only unsolicited AESI data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited AESI was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited AESI were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with unsolicited AESIs throughout the trial were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 387
MAAEs are defined as AEs leading to an unscheduled visit to or by a healthcare professional including visits to an emergency department, but not fulfilling seriousness criteria. Only unsolicited MAAEs data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited MAAE was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited MAAEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with unsolicited MAAEs throughout the trial were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 387
Only any unsolicited AE leading to participant's withdrawal from the trial data was planned to be collected and assessed for the assessment of this OM and solicited AE leading to participant's withdrawal from the trial was out of the scope of assessment. Unsolicited AEs were those AEs that were not pre-defined for which the participant was not specifically questioned in the participant diary. Percentage of participants with any unsolicited AE leading to withdrawal from the trial from the day of vaccination throughout the trial were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 387
Time frame: At Days 22, 50, 202, and 387
GMT was the immunogenicity outcome expressed as reciprocal antibody titer with average for each group. Titer values was measured as below LLOQ were imputed to a value that was half of the LLOQ. GMT of serum IgG antibody levels to the SARS-CoV-2 rS protein was measured where LLOQ was equal to 200.
Time frame: At Days 22, 50, 202, and 387
GMFR was calculated as the ratio of the post-vaccination titer level to the baseline titer level. Where baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Days 22, 50, 202, and 387
SCR was defined as percentage of participants with 4-fold or more rises in titer if naive at baseline OR percentage of participants with 2-fold or more rises in titer if seropositive at baseline. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Days 22, 50, 202, and 387
SRR was defined as percentage of participants with >=95 percentile in titer at Baseline for all participants. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Days 22, 36, 50, 202 and 387
The neutralization titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which greater than or equal to (>=) 50% of the replicate wells were protected from infection (MN50). GMT was the immunogenicity outcome expressed as reciprocal antibody titer with average for each group. Titer values was measured as below LLOQ were imputed to a value that was half of the LLOQ. GMT of serum IgG antibody levels to the SARS-CoV-2 rS protein was measured where LLOQ was equal to 20.
Time frame: At Days 22, 36, 50, 202 and 387
The neutralization titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which >=50% of the replicate wells were protected from infection (MN50). GMFR was calculated as the ratio of the post-vaccination titer level to the baseline titer level. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Days 22, 36, 50, 202 and 387
The neutralization titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which >=50% of the replicate wells were protected from infection (MN50). SCR was defined as percentage of participants with 4-fold or more rises in titer if naive at baseline OR percentage of participants with 2-fold or more rises in titer if seropositive at Baseline. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Time frame: At Days 22, 36, 50, 202 and 387
The neutralization titer was expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution at which >=50% of the replicate wells were protected from infection (MN50). SRR was defined as percentage of participants with >=95 percentile in titer at Baseline for all participants. Baseline was defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study intervention.
Takeda
Industry
A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of TAK-019 by Intramuscular Injection in Healthy Japanese Male and Female Adults Aged 20 Years and Older (COVID-19)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.