Tadalafil
DrugAdministered Orally
Other names: Cialis, LY450190
NCT Number: NCT01352507
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether, after two 8-week treatment periods, male patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) in China prefer 20 milligram (mg) tadalafil or 100 mg sildenafil. This trial consists of two treatment periods of 8 weeks each and an extension phase of 8 weeks, for a total of 24 weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Male
Interventional
Phase 4
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician., Beijing, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Study Subjects
Partners
Exclusion criteria
Administered Orally
Other names: Cialis, LY450190
Administered Orally
Time frame: Week 18
PITPQ Question (Q) 1 was a dichotomous outcome measure in which the participant selected his preferred study treatment (tadalafil or sildenafil) to receive during the Extension Phase.
Time frame: Week 18
PITPQ Q2 was a measure of the degree of treatment preference based on the participant's opinion. The question was, "For the treatment preference you selected in Q1, what is your degree of preference?". Choices were moderate or strong.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Self-reported overall satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF overall satisfaction was the sum of Q13 and Q14. Scores ranged from 1 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF overall satisfaction domain score. Higher IIEF overall satisfaction domain scores were indicative of greater overall satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2, "Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?". The SEP Q2 score was determined as the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of "yes" responses at endpoint minus the percentage of "yes" responses at baseline. Change in percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q2 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q2.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The sexual self-confidence domain score was the average score for Items 5, 10, 15, 23, 27, and 29. Sexual self-confidence domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain scores at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS sexual self-confidence domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater sexual self-confidence.
Time frame: Week 18
DRAQ was a questionnaire used to record explanations for why participants preferred a drug. Participants identified their first and second reasons for drug preference from a choice of 7 reasons. Each reason for drug preference includes participants who selected that reason as their first or second reason.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Self-reported intercourse satisfaction over the past 4 weeks. IIEF intercourse satisfaction was the sum of Q6, Q7, and Q8 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (low/no satisfaction) to 5 (high satisfaction) for each question, with the total possible score for the 3 questions ranging from 0 to 15. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain score. Higher scores were indicative of an increase in intercourse satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Self-reported sexual desire over the past 4 weeks. IIEF sexual desire was the sum of Q11 and Q12. Scores ranged from 1 (low/almost never) to 5 (very high/almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 2 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF sexual desire domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF sexual desire domain score. Higher scores were indicative of increased sexual desire.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Self-reported orgasmic function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF orgasmic function was the sum of Q9 and Q10 of the IIEF. Scores ranged from 0 (no stimulation) to 5 (almost always) for each question, with the total possible score for the 2 questions ranging from 0 to 10. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF orgasmic function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF orgasmic function domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better orgasmic function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Participant-assessed diary that assessed the mean change from baseline in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3, "Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?". The SEP Q3 score was determined as the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3 out of all sexual attempts recorded during the time period. Change was defined as the percentage of "yes" responses at endpoint minus percentage of "yes" responses at baseline. Change in the percentage of "yes" responses to SEP Q3 at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in SEP Q3.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The spontaneity domain score was the average score for Items 3, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 28. Spontaneity domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS spontaneity domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS spontaneity domain score. Higher scores were indicative of greater spontaneity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
PAIRS was a self-administered, 29-item scale that assessed the broader psychological and interpersonal outcomes associated with ED and its treatment. Each question was rated on a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The time concerns domain score was the average score for Items 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 20, 24, and 25. Time concern domain scores ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in PAIRS time concerns at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in PAIRS time concerns domain score. Higher scores were indicative of more time concerns.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, and Week 18
Self-reported erectile function over the past 4 weeks. IIEF erectile function was the sum of Q1 through Q5 and Q15 of the IIEF. Q1 through Q5 were scored 0 (low/no erectile function) to 5 (high erectile function) and Q15 was scored 1 (no/low confidence) to 5 (high confidence). IIEF erectile function domain scores ranged from 1 to 30. Change was defined as endpoint minus baseline domain score. Change in IIEF erectile function domain at Week 8 and Week 18 were averaged to produce an overall change in IIEF EF domain score. Higher scores were indicative of better erectile function.
Eli Lilly and Company
Industry
An Evaluation of Tadalafil and Sildenafil Treatment in Men With Erectile Dysfunction in China
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07715448
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Ejaculatory Dysfunction
Banī Suwayf, Beni Suef Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06805513
Erectile Dysfunction, Genital Diseases
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07692867
Erectile Dysfunction, Genital Diseases
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07460167
Erectile Dysfunction, Genital Diseases
Qina, Egypt
View Trial Details