Tocilizumab
DrugTocilizumab 162 mg will be administered subcutaneously QW.
Other names: RoActemra, Actemra
NCT Number: NCT02046616
This Phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of SC tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs in participants with active RA who are naive to tocilizumab. Participants will receive tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously weekly (QW) for 24 weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Aalborg Universitetshospital Nord, Reumatologisk Afdeling, Aalborg, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tocilizumab 162 mg will be administered subcutaneously QW.
Other names: RoActemra, Actemra
Methotrexate dosing is not specified by the protocol and will be given as per standard practice. Participants must be at a stable dose that was initiated at least 4 weeks prior to baseline.
Participants will receive non-biologic DMARDs (same non-biologic DMARD that participant was receiving at time of study entry). Dosing is not specified by the protocol and will be given as per standard practice. Participants must be at a stable dose that was initiated at least 4 weeks prior to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
CDAI was derived as the sum of the following: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), participant global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, and physician assessment of disease activity. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 millimeters (mm) and rounded to the nearest centimeter (cm) on a visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total CDAI score range was 0-76, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
DAS28-ESR was based on TJC, SJC, PGA of disease activity, and laboratory-derived ESR. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA of disease activity was scored 0-100 mm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total DAS28-ESR score was transformed to a single score range of 0-10, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
ACR response was assessed on the basis of percent improvement (20% for ACR20, 50% for ACR50, 70% for ACR70) in both TJC and SJC as well as at least three of the following: physician assessment of disease activity, PGA of disease activity, PGA of pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and either ESR or C-reactive protein level. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, out of 68 and 66 assessed joints, respectively. PGA and physician assessments were scored 0-100 mm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity or pain. HAQ-DI was scored using participant responses to 20 questions assessing activities of daily living (ADLs), with total score scale of 0-3, where higher scores indicate increased functional disability. The percentage of participants meeting criteria for each level of ACR response was reported.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
EULAR response was assessed by change from baseline and absolute DAS28-ESR score. EULAR response classification was as follows: Good (change >1.2 with absolute score </=3.2), Moderate (change >1.2 with absolute score >3.2 or change >0.6 with absolute score </=5.1), None (change </=0.6 or absolute score >5.1). DAS28-ESR was based on TJC, SJC, and PGA of disease activity, and laboratory-derived ESR. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA of disease activity was scored 0-100 mm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total DAS28-ESR score was transformed to a single score range of 0-10, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. The percentage of participants meeting criteria for each level of EULAR response was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16, 20, 24
CDAI was derived as the sum of the following: TJC, SJC, PGA of disease activity, and physician assessment of disease activity. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 mm and rounded to the nearest cm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total CDAI score range was 0-76, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
SDAI was derived as the sum of the following: TJC, SJC, PGA of disease activity, physician assessment of disease activity, and laboratory-derived C-reactive protein level. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 mm and rounded to the nearest cm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total SDAI score range was 0-86, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
TJC was taken as the number of tender joints out of 28 assessed joints.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
SJC was taken as the number of swollen joints out of 28 assessed joints.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
The percentage of participants with at least one adverse event leading to dose/frequency reduction or temporary dose hold was reported.
Time frame: Baseline to FU Week 8 (up to 32 weeks overall)
Participants were evaluated for the presence of anti-tocilizumab antibodies. Confirmatory assays were performed in the case of a positive screen assay result.
Time frame: Predose (30 minutes) at baseline; Weeks 12, 24; and FU Week 8 (up to 32 weeks overall)
Tocilizumab concentration was determined, averaged among all participants, and expressed in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL).
Time frame: Predose (30 minutes) at baseline; Weeks 12, 24; and FU Week 8 (up to 32 weeks overall)
sIL-6R concentration was determined, averaged among all participants, and expressed in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
PGA of disease activity was scored 0-100 mm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
PGA of RA-related pain was scored 0-100 mm on a VAS, where higher scores indicate greater perceived pain. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement/reduction in RA-related pain.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
HAQ-DI consisted of 20 questions assessing ADLs in 8 domains (dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, hygiene) with each item rated 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The highest score recorded for any question in a domain determined the score for that domain, unless assistance was required. The total HAQ-DI score was the sum of domain scores divided by the number of domains answered/scored, for a single score range of 0-3, where higher scores indicate increased functional disability. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Negative values indicate improvement in ability to perform ADLs.
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants were provided with diary cards to record home injections. Compliance with treatment was calculated individually for each participant as the actual number of injections as a percentage of the planned number of injections (up to the point of discontinuation for those who discontinued study treatment prematurely) and then averaged among all participants.
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
FACIT-F consisted of 40 questions/statements assessing chronic illness therapy with special emphasis on fatigue over the past 7 days, with each item rated 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). During score calculations, negatively-worded item scales (e.g., "I have a lack of energy") were reversed so that higher scores indicated more favorable conditions. The total FACIT-F score was the sum of all item scores and ranged 0-160, and the brief FACIT-F score was the sum of 13 item scores and ranged 0-52, where higher scores indicate greater well-being. Change from baseline was averaged among all participants. Positive values indicate improvement in well-being.
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
Tocilizumab SC in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to DMARDs. A Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy. In a Subgroup of Patients Inflammation Will Be Measured by Ultrasound.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details