Rucaparib
DrugRucaparib will be administered daily
Other names: CO-338
NCT Number: NCT02952534
The purpose of this study is to determine how patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and evidence of a homologous recombination gene deficiency, respond to treatment with rucaparib.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2
Northern Cancer Insitute, St. Leonards, Saint Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Rucaparib will be administered daily
Other names: CO-338
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
The primary efficacy endpoint is confirmed radiographic ORR by central IRR. ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed CR (complete response) or PR (partial response) by mRECIST (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) v1.1/PCWG3 (Prostate Cancer Working Group 3) criteria. The confirmed response is defined as a CR or PR on subsequent tumor assessment at least 28 days after first response documentation in the absence of confirmed progression in bone. CR is disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A supportive efficacy endpoint is confirmed radiographic ORR by INV. ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a confirmed CR (complete response) or PR (partial response) by mRECIST (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) v1.1/PCWG3 (Prostate Cancer Working Group 3) criteria. The confirmed response is defined as a CR or PR on subsequent tumor assessment at least 28 days after first response documentation in the absence of confirmed progression in bone. CR is disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is DOR by central IRR. The DOR is defined as the time from the date that a confirmed response per modified RECIST Version 1.1/PCWG3 is first reported to the time that progressive disease (PD) is first documented. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.1, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, or an unequivocal increase in non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. PCWG3 criteria is used to document evidence of disease progression in bone lesions.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is DOR as assessed by the investigator. The DOR is defined as the time from the date that a confirmed response per modified RECIST Version 1.1/PCWG3 is first reported to the time that progressive disease (PD) is first documented. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1.1, as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, or an unequivocal increase in non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. PCWG3 criteria is used to document evidence of disease progression in bone lesions.
Time frame: PSA assessments were done at baseline, Week 5, Week 9, every 4 weeks thereafter, and at Treatment Discontinuation. Total follow-up was up to approximately 39 months.
A secondary endpoint is confirmed PSA (prostate-specific antigen) response (≥ 50% reduction) as assessed by local laboratory. Confirmed PSA response is analyzed for all patients who had PSA value at baseline and is defined as the percentage of patients having 2 consecutive PSA values (at least 3 weeks apart) that are at least 50% lower than baseline and that occur prior to PSA progression. PSA progression is defined as a ≥ 25% increase and absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir in PSA.
Time frame: PSA assessments were done at baseline, Week 5, Week 9, every 4 weeks thereafter, and at Treatment Discontinuation. Total follow-up was up to approximately 39 months.
A secondary endpoint is confirmed PSA (prostate-specific antigen) response (≥ 90% reduction) as assessed by local laboratory. Confirmed PSA response is analyzed for all patients who had PSA value at baseline and is defined as the percentage of patients having 2 consecutive PSA values (at least 3 weeks apart) that are at least 90% lower than baseline and that occur prior to PSA progression. PSA progression is defined as a ≥ 25% increase and absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir in PSA.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is Radiologic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) assessed by IRR. rPFS is defined as the time from first dose of rucaparib to the date of first objective evidence of radiographic progression (soft tissue or bone lesion) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, plus 1 day. Radiographic disease progression includes confirmed bone disease progression and soft tissue disease progression adjudicated by IRR using the PCWG3 guidelines for bone disease and modified RECIST Version 1.1 for soft tissue disease.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is Radiologic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) assessed by Investigator. rPFS is defined as the time from first dose of rucaparib to the date of first objective evidence of radiographic progression (soft tissue or bone lesion) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, plus 1 day. Radiographic disease progression includes confirmed bone disease progression and soft tissue disease progression using the PCWG3 guidelines for bone disease and modified RECIST Version 1.1 for soft tissue disease.
Time frame: From date of first dose until event, loss to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study closure: an overall median of approximately 33.1 months
A secondary efficacy endpoint is Overall Survival (OS). OS is defined as the date from first dose of rucaparib to the date of death due to any cause, +1 day.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) assessed by IRR. CBR is defined as the number of patients without radiographic progression (defined by modified RECIST Version 1.1/ PCWG3 criteria) who were continuing with study drug treatment through the given time interval divided by the number of patients who had the given amount of follow-up. Clinical benefit rates are summarized at 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: Assessments every 8 weeks from study day 1 for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks until disease progression, death, or initiation of subsequent treatment. Total follow-up was up to approximately 3 years.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) assessed by Investigator. CBR is defined as the number of patients without radiographic progression (defined by modified RECIST Version 1.1/ PCWG3 criteria) who were continuing with study drug treatment through the given time interval divided by the number of patients who had the given amount of follow-up. Clinical benefit rates are summarized at 6 and 12 months.
Time frame: PSA assessments were done at baseline, Week 5, Week 9, every 4 weeks thereafter, and at Treatment Discontinuation. Total follow-up was up to approximately 39 months.
A secondary efficacy endpoint is time to PSA progession. Time to PSA progression is defined as the time from first dose of rucaparib to the date that a ≥ 25% increase and absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or baseline if there was no PSA decline after baseline) in PSA was measured, plus 1 day. The increase must be confirmed by a second consecutive assessment conducted at least 3 weeks later (unless the PSA progression occurred at the last recorded PSA assessment). If confirmed, the date used for time of PSA progression is the earlier of the 2 PSA dates.
Time frame: Participants were assessed at Study Day 29, Day 57, Day 85 and Day 113
Trough (Cmin) concentrations of rucaparib are summarized for all patients with at least one PK sample collected. The absolute values of rucaparib plasma concentration at each time point are presented by gene.
pharmaand GmbH
Industry
TRITON2: A Multicenter, Open-label Phase 2 Study of Rucaparib in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Associated With Homologous Recombination Deficiency
Acronym: TRITON2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03641560
Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Ahmedabad, India
View Trial DetailsNCT02975934
Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03570619
Metastatic Cancer, Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02288247
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Linz, Austria
View Trial Details