Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01334918

A Study of Regadenoson in Subjects Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Using Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Compared to Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)

The purpose of this study is to compare Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with regadenoson in order to detect the presence or absence of reversible defects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Arterial Occlusive Diseases Arteriosclerosis Cardiovascular Diseases Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Disease Heart Diseases Ischemia Myocardial Ischemia Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Vascular Diseases

Age range

45 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Sutter Roseville Medical Center, Roseville, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

All participants will be randomized to one of two imaging sequences: rest/stress SPECT on Day 1 followed by stress/rest MDCT on Day 2 or stress/rest MDCT on Day 1 followed by rest/stress SPECT on Day 2. All stress scans will involve the injection of regadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male subjects must be ≥ 45 years of age
  • Female subjects must be ≥ 50 years of age
  • Subject has met at least one of the following three criteria:
  • has a suspected (clinical impression) or known diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) with typical angina that has been referred from nuclear cardiology lab schedule or cardiac computed tomography (CT) schedule
  • has stable symptoms with possible elective catheterization procedure scheduled and where further imaging may be beneficial;
  • has known CAD from a previous invasive coronary angiography (ICA) performed more than 12 weeks prior to screening who now present with new cardiac symptoms
  • Subject has been referred for a clinically indicated myocardial perfusion imaging procedure or Cardiac CT procedure for suspected moderate or high risk CAD
  • Subject must abstain from eating and drinking 30 minutes prior and 30 minutes post study drug administration
  • Subject must abstain from smoking 3 hours prior and 8 hours post study drug administration
  • Subject must abstain from any intake of methylxanthine-containing foods and beverages within 12 hours prior to Day 1 visit through the Day 3 Follow-Up Visit, as these foods may alter regadenoson effects. Subject is able to safely abstain from theophylline use for 12 hours prior to study drug administration

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject is concurrently participating in another drug study or has received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening
  • Subject has a history of a clinically significant illness (other than CAD), medical condition, or laboratory abnormality, which would preclude participation in the study
  • Subject has renal dysfunction demonstrated by a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 45 mL/min (calculated using Cockroft-Gault formula Note: Subjects with a GFR 45-60 mL/min will undergo a hydration procedure
  • Female subject who is pregnant, lactating or of childbearing potential that refuses to use a medically acceptable form of contraception until the Telephone Follow up Visit is complete
  • Female subject has a positive pregnancy test prior to randomization
  • Subject has a history of second or third degree heart block or sinus node dysfunction unless the subject has a functioning pacemaker
  • Subject has symptomatic hypotension (temporary and reversible conditions that no longer exist are allowed)
  • Subject is allergic or intolerant to aminophylline, nitroglycerin or metoprolol
  • Subject is allergic or intolerant to regadenoson or any of its excipients
  • Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with the procedure schedule
  • Subject has previously enrolled in this study or was enrolled in another regadenoson study sponsored by Astellas
  • Subject has atrial fibrillation or significant arrhythmias which may result in decreased image quality for the imaging studies (CT and SPECT)
  • Subject has high heart rate (> 65 beats per minute) and contra-indications to administer beta-blockers (severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, second and third degree atrioventricular block)

Treatment and study plan

Regadenoson

Drug

Administered by intravenous bolus.

Other names: CVT 3146, Lexiscan

technetium Tc99m sestamibi /technetium Tc99m tetrafosmin

Radiation

Administered by intravenous infusion

Other names: Cardiolite, Myoview

Contrast

Radiation

Administered by intravenous infusion.

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography

Procedure

Procedure/Surgery

Multidetector Computed Tomography

Procedure

Procedure/Surgery

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Reversible Defects

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    The number of reversible defects categorized into absence or presence of ischemia (0-1 versus ≥2), as assessed by the central imaging laboratory for both SPECT and MDCT. The 17-segment model for standardized myocardial segmentation was used for myocardial perfusion readings for SPECT and MDCT. At rest and stress, each segment was scored on a 0 to 4 scale according to the amount of contrast or radiotracer the myocardium in the segment absorbed: -0: normal perfusion -1: slightly reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -2: moderately reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -3: severely reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -4: absent contrast/radiotracer uptake. The median score from the 3 blinded readers for each segment was used. If the stress score was ≥ 2 and the rest score was less than the stress score, the segment was counted as having a reversible defect. A participant was classified as ischemic in the presence of 2 or more segments with reversible defects, excluding segment 17.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Image Quality of Scans by Modality and Reviewer

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    Overall image quality was assessed by three independent blinded readers for each modality (single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)). Image quality was rated on a 4-point scale as either excellent, good, fair or poor at rest using SPECT and MDCT and under stress using regadenoson SPECT and regadenoson stress computed tomography perfusion (CTP).

  2. Number of Participants With Reversible Defects in the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery (LAD)

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    The number of reversible defects in the LAD categorized into absence or presence of ischemia (0-1 versus ≥2), as assessed by the central imaging laboratory for both SPECT and MDCT. The 17-segment model for standardized myocardial segmentation was used for myocardial perfusion readings for SPECT and MDCT. At rest and stress, each segment was scored on a 0 to 4 scale according to the amount of contrast or radiotracer the myocardium in the segment absorbed: -0: normal perfusion -1: slightly reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -2: moderately reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -3: severely reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -4: absent contrast/radiotracer uptake. The median score from 3 blinded readers for each segment was used. If the stress score was ≥ 2 and the rest score was less than the stress score, the segment was counted as having a reversible defect. A participant was classified as ischemic in the presence of ≥ 2 segments with reversible defects, excluding segment 17.

  3. Number of Participants With Reversible Defects in the Right Coronary Artery (RCA)

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    The number of reversible defects in the RCA categorized into absence or presence of ischemia (0-1 versus ≥2), as assessed by the central imaging laboratory for both SPECT and MDCT. The 17-segment model for standardized myocardial segmentation was used for myocardial perfusion readings for SPECT and MDCT. At rest and stress, each segment was scored on a 0 to 4 scale according to the amount of contrast or radiotracer the myocardium in the segment absorbed: -0: normal perfusion -1: slightly reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -2: moderately reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -3: severely reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -4: absent contrast/radiotracer uptake. The median score from 3 blinded readers for each segment was used. If the stress score was ≥ 2 and the rest score was less than the stress score, the segment was counted as having a reversible defect. A participant was classified as ischemic in the presence of ≥ 2 segments with reversible defects, excluding segment 17.

  4. Number of Participants With Reversible Defects in the Left Circumflex Coronary Artery (LCX)

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    The number of reversible defects in the LCX categorized into absence or presence of ischemia (0-1 versus ≥2), as assessed by the central imaging laboratory for both SPECT and MDCT. The 17-segment model for standardized myocardial segmentation was used for myocardial perfusion readings for SPECT and MDCT. At rest and stress, each segment was scored on a 0 to 4 scale according to the amount of contrast or radiotracer the myocardium in the segment absorbed: -0: normal perfusion -1: slightly reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -2: moderately reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -3: severely reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -4: absent contrast/radiotracer uptake. The median score from 3 blinded readers for each segment was used. If the stress score was ≥ 2 and the rest score was less than the stress score, the segment was counted as having a reversible defect. A participant was classified as ischemic in the presence of ≥ 2 segments with reversible defects, excluding segment 17.

  5. Number of Participants With Fixed Defects

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    Using the 17-segment scoring system, a segment scored above 1 (i.e., 2 to 4) and equal at rest and stress was counted as having a fixed defect. At rest and stress, each segment was scored on a 0 to 4 scale according to the amount of contrast or radiotracer the myocardium in the segment absorbed: -0: normal perfusion -1: slightly reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -2: moderately reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -3: severely reduced contrast/radiotracer uptake -4: absent contrast/radiotracer uptake.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Two or More Ischemic Segments on SPECT, But Less on CT

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 2

    Using SPECT as the reference standard, the false negative percentage was calculated as the percentage of participants with two or more ischemic segments on SPECT, but less on CT.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Cross-Over Study of Regadenoson in Subjects Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Apr 13, 2011
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.