Placebo
DrugOral administration
NCT Number: NCT03053427
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of once-daily oral administration of gabapentin enacarbil versus placebo, based on the change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score in participants with moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome. This study also assessed the safety of Gabapentin enacarbil.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Site JP00025, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
After 1 week run in period with single-blind placebo, participants meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with either gabapentin enacarbil 600 mg or placebo for 12 weeks treatment period. After then, single-blind placebo was given for 1 week for follow-up observation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Be of non-childbearing potential:
Or, if of childbearing potential:
Exclusion criteria
Oral administration
Oral administration
Other names: Regnite
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
The IRLS consisted of 10-item scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) with each item ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms). The total IRLS score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher IRLS score indicated greater disease activity. Mixed Model of Repeated Measurements (MMRM) model with compound symmetry as a covariance structure was used. The explanatory variables of the model included treatment group, IRLS score at baseline, age category, estimated creatinine clearance category, time point, and interaction of treatment group and time point.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and EoT (week 12)
ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Time frame: EoT (week 12)
ICGI was assessed by 7-point ordinate scale. Participants who were "Very much improved" or "Much improved" were defined as responders.
Time frame: EoT (week 12)
PCGI was assessed by 7-point ordinate scale. Participants who were "Very much improved" or "Much improved" were defined as responders.
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
The self-rated items of the PSQI generate seven component scores (range of subscale scores, 0-3). The sum of these seven component scores yielded one global score of subjective sleep quality (range, 0-21). Higher scores represent poorer subjective sleep. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Athens Insomnia Scale consisted of 8-item scale (range of subscale scores, 0-3). The scale range of Athens Insomnia was 0-24. Higher scores represent poorer sleep quality. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
The scale range of RLS pain score was 0-10. Higher scores represent greater RLS pain intensity. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.
Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)
Health status was assessed by general visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranges from 0 (worst health status) and 100 (best health status).
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to week 13
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset after the start of the run-in period. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator. Serious TEAE was an AE considered serious.
Astellas Pharma Inc
Industry
Gabapentin Enacarbil Post-marketing Clinical Study A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07561476
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01981941
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Chugoku, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT02397057
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00256854
Dyssomnias, Mental Disorders
Laguna Hills, California, United States
View Trial Details