Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03053427

A Study of Oral Dosing of Gabapentin Enacarbil in Japanese Restless Legs Syndrome Patients

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of once-daily oral administration of gabapentin enacarbil versus placebo, based on the change in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score in participants with moderate-to-severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome. This study also assessed the safety of Gabapentin enacarbil.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Site JP00025, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Loading trial locations.

About this study

After 1 week run in period with single-blind placebo, participants meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with either gabapentin enacarbil 600 mg or placebo for 12 weeks treatment period. After then, single-blind placebo was given for 1 week for follow-up observation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS), based on the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) Diagnostic Criteria.
  • Subject has reported history of RLS symptoms for at least 15 days in the month prior to the first dosing; if on treatment, this frequency of symptoms was started before treatment.
  • Subject with International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) score ≥ 15.
  • Subject has discontinued dopamine agonists, and/or gabapentin at least 1 week prior to the first dosing.
  • Subject has discontinued other treatments for RLS at least 2 weeks prior to the first dosing.
  • Female subject must either:

Be of non-childbearing potential:

  • Post-menopausal (defined as at least 1 year without any menses) prior to Screening, or
  • documented surgically sterile

Or, if of childbearing potential:

  • Agree not to try to become pregnant during the study and for 28 days after the final study drug administration
  • And have a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening
  • And, if heterosexually active, agree to consistently use two forms of highly effective birth control starting at Screening and throughout the study period and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female subject must not donate ova starting at Screening and throughout the study period, and for 28 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while on treatment.
  • Subject with a Body Mass Index of ≥ 18.5 and < 30.
  • Subject with estimated creatinine clearance of ≥ 60 mL/min.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has a sleep disorder that may significantly affect the assessment of RLS.
  • Subject has a history of RLS symptom augmentation or end-of-dose rebound with previous dopamine agonist treatment.
  • Subject has neurologic disease or movement disorder.
  • Subject has poorly controlled diabetes, iron deficiency anemia, or are currently taking any sedative/hypnotic.
  • Subject has a history of suicide attempt within 6 months prior to informed consent.
  • Subject has a high level of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST).
  • Subject is currently suffering from moderate or severe depression.
  • Subject has a history of alcohol dependence or drug abuse, or subject had alcohol or drug abuse or dependence in the last 1 year.
  • Subject is a shift worker, professional driver, or operator of dangerous machinery.
  • Subject has clinically significant or unstable medical conditions.
  • Subject has a history of hypersensitivity reaction to gabapentin.
  • Subject has previously taken pregabalin, gabapentin enacarbil, or the study drug of Gabapentin enacarbil.
  • Subject has participated in a clinical study for another investigational drug or medical device or post-marketing clinical study within 12 weeks (84 days) prior to the first dosing, or is currently participating in any of these studies.

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

Oral administration

Gabapentin Enacarbil

Drug

Oral administration

Other names: Regnite

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS) Score at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12

    The IRLS consisted of 10-item scale for assessing severity of restless legs syndrome (RLS) with each item ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms). The total IRLS score ranges from 0 to 40. Higher IRLS score indicated greater disease activity. Mixed Model of Repeated Measurements (MMRM) model with compound symmetry as a covariance structure was used. The explanatory variables of the model included treatment group, IRLS score at baseline, age category, estimated creatinine clearance category, time point, and interaction of treatment group and time point.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in IRLS Score at Each Time Point

    Time frame: Baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and EoT (week 12)

    ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.

  2. Percentage of Participants With an Investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression (ICGI) Response

    Time frame: EoT (week 12)

    ICGI was assessed by 7-point ordinate scale. Participants who were "Very much improved" or "Much improved" were defined as responders.

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Patient-rated Clinical Global Impression (PCGI) Response

    Time frame: EoT (week 12)

    PCGI was assessed by 7-point ordinate scale. Participants who were "Very much improved" or "Much improved" were defined as responders.

  4. Change From Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Total Score (PSQI)

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)

    The self-rated items of the PSQI generate seven component scores (range of subscale scores, 0-3). The sum of these seven component scores yielded one global score of subjective sleep quality (range, 0-21). Higher scores represent poorer subjective sleep. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.

  5. Change From Baseline in Athens Insomnia Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)

    Athens Insomnia Scale consisted of 8-item scale (range of subscale scores, 0-3). The scale range of Athens Insomnia was 0-24. Higher scores represent poorer sleep quality. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.

  6. Change From Baseline in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Pain Score

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)

    The scale range of RLS pain score was 0-10. Higher scores represent greater RLS pain intensity. ANCOVA model with the baseline value as a covariate was used.

  7. Change From Baseline in Health Status Score of EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: Baseline and EoT (week 12)

    Health status was assessed by general visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS ranges from 0 (worst health status) and 100 (best health status).

  8. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to week 13

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) with onset after the start of the run-in period. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator. Serious TEAE was an AE considered serious.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Astellas Pharma Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Gabapentin Enacarbil Post-marketing Clinical Study A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome.

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Feb 15, 2017
Registry last updated
Dec 12, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.