Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00883181

A Study of Neutropenia and Anemia Management in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Myelotoxic Chemotherapy

The primary objective was to describe the incidence of febrile neutropenia based on granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) use (primary, secondary, treatment, or no usage) in patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This is a multi-center international observational study of patients receiving myelotoxic regimens, with an investigator assessed risk of febrile neutropenia ≥ 20%, for the treatment of solid tumors (breast, ovarian and lung).

This is an observational study in which patient risk factors were qualitatively (but not quantitatively) assessed, and adherence to G-CSF primary prophylaxis was at the discretion of physicians and not mandated by the protocol.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects greater than or equal to 18 years old with breast, ovarian or lung cancer receiving chemotherapy in any schedule, e.g. dose dense or standard chemotherapy.
  • These subjects must have an Investigator assessed risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) ≥20% (based on 2006 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) G-CSF Guidelines

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with concurrent administration of radiotherapy are not eligible (previous radiotherapy is permitted if terminated at least 2 weeks prior to commencing applicable chemotherapy in this study).

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN)

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    Febrile neutropenia was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm².

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Received No Prophylaxis or Treatment With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factors (G-CSF) Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants in the No G-CSF use group received no G-CSF prophylaxis or treatment at any time during cycles 1 to 8.

  3. Percentage of Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was defined as receiving pegfilgrastim starting in cycle 1 on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Participants who received G-CSF support from the beginning of Cycle 1 were assigned to primary prophylaxis regardless of whether they continued to receive G-CSF support in subsequent cycles.

  4. Percentage of Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Primary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any daily G-CSF (e.g. filgrastim or lenograstim) starting in cycle 1 on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Participants who received G-CSF support from the beginning of cycle 1 were assigned to primary prophylaxis regardless of whether they continued to receive G-CSF support in subsequent cycles.

  5. Percentage of Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was defined as receiving pegfilgrastim starting in cycle 2 onwards on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Adherence of G-CSF support in subsequent cycles was not required for secondary prophylaxis; just an initiation of pegfilgrastim support in the beginning of cycle 2 or later. Results include the FN event that may have triggered the secondary prophylaxis treatment.

  6. Percentage of Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Secondary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any daily G-CSF starting in cycle 2 onwards on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Adherence of G-CSF support in subsequent cycles was not required for secondary prophylaxis; just an initiation of G-CSF support in the beginning of cycle 2 or later. Results include the FN event that may have triggered the secondary prophylaxis treatment.

  7. Percentage of Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With an Other G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Primary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any other G-CSF starting in cycle 1 on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Participants who received G-CSF support from the beginning of cycle 1 were assigned to primary prophylaxis regardless of whether they continued to receive G-CSF support in subsequent cycles.

  8. Percentage of Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With an Other G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Secondary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any daily G-CSF starting in cycle 2 onwards on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Adherence of G-CSF support in subsequent cycles was not required for secondary prophylaxis; just an initiation of G-CSF support in the beginning of cycle 2 or later. Results include the FN event that may have triggered the secondary prophylaxis treatment.

  9. Percentage of Participants Receiving Treatment With Pegfilgrastim Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Treatment with pegfilgrastim is defined as participants who started pegfilgrastim treatment after day 7 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and after day 11 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed after day 7.

  10. Percentage of Participants Receiving Treatment With Any Daily G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Treatment with any daily G-CSF is defined as participants who started daily G-CSF treatment after day 7 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and after day 11 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed after day 7.

  11. Percentage of Participants Receiving Treatment With Any Other G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of < 500 cells/mm² or < 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Treatment with any other G-CSF is defined as participants who started other G-CSF treatment after day 7 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and after day 11 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed after day 7.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

  2. Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The average number of days of pegfilgrastim use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.

  3. Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The average number of days of daily G-CSF use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.

  4. Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The average number of days of pegfilgrastim use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.

  5. Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The average number of days of daily G-CSF use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.

  6. Number of Days of Treatment in Participants Receiving Treatment With Pegfilgrastim

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The average number of days of pegfilgrastim use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.

  7. Number of Days of Treatment in Participants Receiving Treatment With Any Daily G-CSF

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 Through 8

    Time frame: Cycles 2 - 8 (approximately 21 weeks)

    A dose delay is defined as a delay of more than 3 days in the start of chemotherapy measured since the start of the previous cycle. The percentage of participants with delays in chemotherapy administration are summarized by the length of delay (> 3 days, > 5 days, and > 7 days) across cycles 2 through 8.

  9. Percentage of Cycles With Chemotherapy Dose Delays

    Time frame: Cycles 2 - 8 (approximately 21 days)

    A dose delay is defined as a delay of > 3 days in the start of chemotherapy measured since the start of the previous cycle. The percentage of cycles delayed are summarized by the length of delay (> 3 days, > 5 days, and > 7 days) across cycles 2 through 8.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapy Dose Reductions

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    A participant is considered to have a dose reduction in a given cycle if there was a ≥ 15% reduction in dose of any chemotherapy agent planned for that cycle, relative to the dose planned at the baseline visit for that cycle.

  11. Percentage of Cycles With Chemotherapy Dose Reductions

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    A dose reduction in a given cycle is defined as a ≥ 15% reduction in dose of any chemotherapy agent planned for that cycle, relative to the dose planned at the baseline visit for that cycle.

  12. Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8

    Time frame: Cycles 2 - 8 (approximately 21 weeks)

    A dose delay is defined as a delay of > 3 days in the start of chemotherapy measured since the start of the previous cycle.

  13. Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    A dose reduction in a given cycle is defined as a ≥ 15% reduction in dose of any chemotherapy agent planned for that cycle, relative to the dose planned at the baseline visit for that cycle.

  14. Number of Participants With Systemic Anti-infective Use in Cycles 1 to 8

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    Number of participants with systemic anti-infective use, including antibiotics, anti-fungal and virostatic for prophylaxis or treatment.

  15. Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospitalizations

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    Unplanned hospitalizations included only those which involved an overnight stay and occurred in cycles 1 to 8.

  16. Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment

    Time frame: End of treatment (approximately 24 weeks)

  17. Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The number of participants experiencing treatment related grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities during cycles 1 to 8. Participants experiencing both Grade 3 and Grade 4 toxicities are reported under Grade 4 only (maximum toxicity). Toxicity grades for hematology data are defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) - Grade 3: < 1.0 - 0.5 x 10^9/L; ANC - Grade 4: < 0.5 x 10^9/L; White blood cells (WBC) - Grade 3: < 2.0 - 1.0 x 10^9/L; WBC - Grade 4: < 1.0 x 10^9/L; Hemoglobin - Grade 3: < 8.0 - 6.5 g/dL; Hemoglobin - Grade 4: < 6.5 g/dL; Platelets - Grade 3: < 50 - 25 x 10^9/L; Platelets - Grade 4: < 25 x 10^9/L.

  18. Time to Disease Progression

    Time frame: From cycle 1, day 1 until end of the long-term follow-up; median time on follow-up from cycle 1, day 1 was 52 months.

    Time to disease progression was calculated from cycle 1 day 1 to a date at which disease progression was first recorded. Participants who died due to causes other than disease progression were censored at the date of death. Participants who were alive and whose disease had not progressed at the most recent contact, or who were lost to follow-up, or with missing data, were censored at the date of last contact. Median time to disease progression was estimated from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.

  19. Duration of Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents (ESAs)

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

  20. Reason for Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The reason treatment with an ESA was initiated as recorded by the investigator; participants may have more than one reason for initiating treatment.

  21. Hemoglobin Level at Initiation of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent Treatment

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

  22. Number of Clinical Visits in Cycles 1-8 by ESA Use

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    The average number of clinical visits per month (28 day period) during cycles 1 to 8 and during the period of ESA treatment in cycles 1 to 8.

  23. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Required a Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion After 5 Weeks of ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants with RBC transfusions from five weeks post initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  24. Change in Hemoglobin During ESA Treatment Phase

    Time frame: Initiation of ESA treatment (last assessment on or prior to ESA day 1) and at end of ESA treatment; median duration of ESA treatment was 4 weeks, maximum was 23 weeks.

  25. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hematopoietic Response

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants in cycles 1 to 8 receiving ESA treatment who achieved a hematopoietic response during the ESA treatment phase, defined as a hemoglobin concentration ≥ 12 g/dL or a ≥ 2 g/dL rise in hemoglobin after starting ESA treatment.

  26. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 9 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  27. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 10 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  28. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 11 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  29. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 12 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  30. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin From 10 to 12 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level from 10 to 12 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  31. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin From 12 to 13 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment

    Time frame: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level from 12 to 13 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.

  32. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin From 10 to 12 g/dL 9 Weeks After Initiation of ESA Treatment

    Time frame: 9 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment

    The percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level from 10 to 12 g/dL after 9 weeks of ESA treatment.

  33. Number of Participants With Systemic Transfusions in Cycles 1 to 8

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

    Number of participants who received transfusions, including platelets, packed red blood cells, whole blood, or other, during cycles 1 to 8.

  34. Number of Transfusions Per Participant in Cycles 1 to 8

    Time frame: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Amgen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective Observational Study of Neutropenia and Anemia Management in Subjects With Solid Tumors Receiving Myelotoxic Chemotherapy

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2014
First posted
Apr 17, 2009
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.