Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01989793

A Study of Muscle Strength Maintenance in Older Adults

This research study is being done to see whether losartan can prevent the decrease in strength associated with aging.

Muscle loss is associated with aging and has multiple symptoms such as weakness, slowness, and fatigue (tiredness). Older adults with muscle weakness have a higher risk of falls and disability. In addition, the loss of independence for older adults can lead to a poorer quality of life.

Recently, it was discovered that losartan, a medication commonly used to treat high blood pressure, had slowed the strength decline seen in older mice. In addition, it allowed injured mice skeletal muscle to heal faster. Therefore, we would like to see if losartan can do the same for older adults.

Losartan is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of high blood pressure, heart failure, and to protect the kidneys in diabetic patients. Losartan is not FDA-approved to prevent the decrease in strength associated with aging.

In this study, participants age 70 and older will be asked to take losartan or a placebo to see if losartan can help prevent loss of muscle strength. A placebo is a substance that looks like the study drug but that contains no active ingredients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

70 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Johns Hopkins Bayview Clinical Research Unit

Baltimore, Maryland, 21224, United States

About this study

The loss of independence in older adults is among the most costly and disturbing events in the life span. This loss is often influenced by multiple etiologies, including medical and neurological conditions, cognitive decline, non-supportive social/environmental settings and frailty. Frailty is a syndrome of multi-systemic, age-related decline characterized by weakness, weight loss, fatigue, low levels of activity, and slowness. Frail older adults have a higher risk for adverse outcomes including hospitalization, disability, and mortality.

Recently, Johns Hopkins University Older Americans Independence Center (JHU OAIC) investigators Burks and Cohn found that blocking angiotensin type 1 receptors with losartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) in older mice markedly accelerated injured skeletal muscle healing and decreased vulnerability to disuse atrophy and strength decline. These findings provide potent rationale for testing the hypothesis that losartan attenuates strength decline and other-frailty related measures in older adults.

To prepare to test this hypothesis, a phase 2 randomized, placebo controlled pilot clinical trial of losartan in pre-frail adults over age 70 is proposed that aims to assess safety and tolerability, estimate dosing range, and estimate treatment effects using inter- and intra-subject variability of potential outcome measures. Losartan is a medication that is commonly utilized in older adults for the treatment of hypertension and is generally well tolerated in that condition and in other cardiovascular conditions.

The study will take place over 24 weeks in the Clinical Research Unit (CRU) on the Hopkins Bayview Medical Campus, where 24 pre-frail subjects will be recruited from the OAIC frailty registry. Successful completion of this study will provide the safety, dosing, and outcome measure data necessary to design the pivotal study needed to determine if longer term treatment with losartan can significantly improve frailty and related skeletal muscle phenotypes.

Interventions, such as losartan, that can prevent the decline seen in frailty have the potential to improve function and help older adults maintain their independence. This is of the utmost importance in maintaining good quality-of-life for older adults.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 70 and over
  • Pre-frail as determined by frailty criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Under age 70
  • Robust or frail by frailty criteria
  • Have other indications for use of any angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) such as myocardial infarction in past year, history of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension
  • Current use of ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
  • Prior allergic reaction to or hyperkalemia with losartan or any ARB
  • Chronic renal failure with a glomerular filtration rate of < 30
  • Current daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
  • Current use of steroids
  • Lower extremity disability that would prevent muscle strength testing
  • Echocardiogram-diagnosed cardiac failure as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%
  • Cognitive impairment with a Mini-Mental State Examination < 24

Treatment and study plan

Losartan

Drug

Losartan will be given in increasing doses to those in the losartan arm.

Placebo

Drug

Placebo will be given to those in placebo arm

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 8

    Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).

    The change in strength between baseline and week 8 (i.e., baseline minus week 8) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates that there was a decrease in isokinetic strength from week 0 to week 8.

  2. Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

    Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).

    The change in strength between baseline and week 16 (i.e., baseline minus week 16) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates decrease in strength from week 0 to week 16.

  3. Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

    Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).

    The change in strength between baseline and week 24 (i.e., baseline minus week 24) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates a decrease in strength from week 0 to week 24.

  4. Fatiguability

    Time frame: Week 8

    Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

    Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to the total work in the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.

  5. Fatiguability

    Time frame: Week 16

    Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

    Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.

  6. Fatiguability

    Time frame: Week 24

    Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.

    Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty

    Time frame: from baseline to 8 weeks

    Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 8 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)

  2. Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty

    Time frame: from baseline to 16 weeks

    Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 16 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)

  3. Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty

    Time frame: from baseline to 24 weeks

    Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 24 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Nov 21, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 12, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.