LY2484595
DrugAdministered orally
NCT Number: NCT01375075
The purpose of this study is to determine if 12 weeks of treatment with LY2484595 administered as a monotherapy will significantly increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in Japanese participants.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
For additional information regarding investigative sites for this trial, contact 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559, 1-317-615-4559) Mon - Fri from 9 AM to 5 PM Eastern Time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST), or speak with your personal physician., Hyōgo, Japan
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Have Low HDL-C or High LDL-C criteria as follows:
Low HDL lipid criteria:
or
High LDL-C lipid criteria:
Note: Subjects with diabetes regarded as 3+ risk factors
Exclusion criteria
Administered orally
Administered orally
Administered orally
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Percent change from baseline = 100*(post-baseline assessment - baseline assessment)/baseline assessment. Higher values in the percent change from baseline represented an improvement for HDL-C and lower values in the percent change from baseline represented an improvement for LDL-C. Least Squares (LS) mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Percent change from baseline = 100*(post-baseline assessment - baseline assessment)/baseline assessment. An increase in the percent change from baseline represented an improvement for HDL-C and a decrease in the percent change from baseline represents an improvement for LDL-C. LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 (predose and postdose), and Week 16
Time frame: Baseline through Week 12
All rash cases were adjudicated by a central dermatologist blinded to treatment assignment according to a study-specific Clinical Events Committee (CEC) charter. Rash events were assessed according to clinical relevance (severity). Categories included high risk, low risk, not a relevant dermatosis, or insufficient documentation for determination. High risk rashes included anaphylaxis, toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens Johnson Syndrome, Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and System Symptoms (DRESS), urticaria/angioedema, vasculitis, erythroderma, and lupus-like reaction. All other rashes were considered low risk or not a relevant dermatosis per the Investigator's clinical opinion. A participant could be reported in multiple categories.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Blood pressure reported as systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP).
LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline through Week 12
Myopathy events were considered muscle-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and liver injury events were considered hepatic disorder-related TEAEs reported per Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. TEAEs were newly occurring AEs or AEs worsening after first dose.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Plasma CETP activity assay employed a fluorometric method to determine the CETP transfer activity. Percent change from baseline = 100*(post-baseline assessment - baseline assessment)/baseline assessment. An increase in the percent change from baseline represented an improvement. LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, and 12
Plasma CETP mass assay was a solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) designated to measure human CETP mass which employed the quantitative enzyme immunoassay principle. An increase in plasma CETP mass represented an improvement. LS mean was adjusted for baseline value of the variable analyzed.
Eli Lilly and Company
Industry
A Phase 2 Dose Response Study of LY2484595 in Japanese Subjects
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06380322
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Fort Carson, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05988866
Dyslipidemias, Hypercholesterolemia
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05075902
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07682285
Cancer-related Fatigue, Carcinoma
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details